Nanoscale Electronic Devices
on Carbon Nanotubes
by
Philip
G. Collins1*,
Hiroshi Bando2,
and A.
Zettl1
1. Department
of Physics, University of California at Berkeley,
andMaterials
Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory,
Berkeley, CA 94720 U.S.A.
2. Physical Science Division, Electrotechnical
Laboratory,
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
* Corresponding Author: philgc@physics.berkeley.edu
|
This is a draft paper
for a talk at the
Fifth
Foresight Conference on Molecular Nanotechnology.
The final version has been submitted
for publication in the special Conference issue of Nanotechnology.
This page uses the HTML <sup> and
<sub> conventions for superscripts and subscripts. If
"103" looks the same as "103"
then your browser does not support superscripts. If "xi"
looks the same as "xi" then your browser does not
support subscripts. Failure to support superscripts or
subscripts can lead to confusion in the following text,
particularly in interpreting exponents.
Abstract
Conductivity measurements were performed on bundles of
single-walled carbon nanotubes with the aid of a scanning
tunneling microscope (STM). Semimetallic current-voltage (I-V)
characteristics generally indicated the bundles to be
electronically similar to graphite. However, by moving the STM
tip along the length of the nanotubes, sharp deviations in the
I-V characteristics could also be observed. Well-defined
positions were found at which the nanotube transport current
changed abruptly from a graphitic response to one that is highly
nonlinear and asymmetric, including near-perfect rectification.
This abrupt change in the nanotube transport suggests that the
STM tip had passed a region of the nanotube which acts less like
a wire than it does a Schottky barrier or other heterojunction.
These observations are consistent with the existence of
localized, on-tube nanodevices as theoretically predicted for
point defects in individual carbon nanotubes.
Introduction
Carbon nanotubes (Iijima 1991) are a fascinating new class of
materials from both theoretical and applied standpoints.
Electronically, theoretical models have predicted that nanotubes
could behave as ideal one-dimensional "quantum wires"
with either semiconducting or metallic behaviors (Hamada et al.
1992; Mintmire et al. 1992; Dresselhaus et al. 1996). Careful
study of transmission electron micrograph (TEM) images, however,
has indicated that the nanotubes also incorporate kinks and
defects into their walls. Recent theoretical attention to
defect-containing nanotubes suggests a rich variety of
heterojunction behaviors (Charlier et al. 1996; Chico et al.
1996a; Chico et al. 1996b; Saito et al. 1996) may be possible in
these one-dimensional wires. Such junctions could provide
electronic elements with sizes inaccessible by lithographic
manufacturing.
Experimental work with multiwalled carbon nanotubes has not
identified these quantum wire or heterojunction behaviors. Room
temperature measurements generally reported metallic
characteristics (Langer 1994; Song et al. 1994; Langer et al.
1996; Fischer et al. 1997) for nanotubes, and in a sliding
contact measurement (Dai et al. 1996) a nanotube was found to
have uniform resistivity throughout its length. These findings
are partly understood as a result of the nanotube morphology,
since the large diameter, multiwalled nanotubes are structurally
and electronically quite similar to graphite and so exhibit a
two-dimensional metallic or semimetallic characteristic rather
than the quantization of a true one-dimensional material.
Progress in nanotube synthesis has now yielded single-walled
nanotubes (SWNTs) with well-defined diameters (Thess et al. 1996;
Journet et al. 1997), bringing the experimental situation much
closer to that of the theoretical models. Recent measurements
indicate that these materials do behave like one-dimensional
wires (Bockrath et al. 1997; Rao et al. 1997; Tans et al. 1997).
The SWNTs should also be more sensitive to defects, to the extent
that defects may dominate the transport characteristics. In this
work, an STM tip was used as a sliding electrical contact to
probe the length-dependence of SWNT conductance. Although atomic
defects were not directly imaged, sharp conductance transitions
and heterojunction behaviors in the nanotube conductances are
suggestive of the signatures of nanotube defects.
Experiment
The SWNTs synthesized using both a laser-assisted process as
previously reported (Thess et al. 1996), and an arc-plasma method
similar to that reported by (Journet et al. 1997). The samples
were subsequently then burned in oxygen at 750° C to remove the
bulk of the amorphous and graphitic material. The resulting
material was observed under TEM to be made up of no less than 90%
nanotubes. A large proportion of the nanotubes have 1.3 nm
diameters and zero chirality (so-called "armchair"
tubes) as indicated by Xray and TEM studies, and have uniform
diameters over micrometer lengths.
The individual SWNTs typically align and close pack into
crystalline "ropes" which can have diameters as large
as 30 nm (Thess et al. 1996; Fischer et al. 1997). Presumably,
the small volume-to-surface area ratio of the nanotubes allows
for strong van der Waals bonding among each other and to flat
surfaces. The same forces which bind the SWNTs together into
ropes allow the ropes to loosely adhere to a clean metal probe, a
fact exploited in the following experiments.
We produced a thick film of randomly aligned nanotubes by
pressing the purified nanotube material onto a gold-coated glass
substrate. Using a specially constructed STM, a sharpened
platinum wire was then brought within tunneling distance of the
disordered surface. With certainty the sample was not suitable
for normal STM imaging, but in this case the STM was merely used
as a precise local-probe micromanipulator. After a controlled
movement of the STM tip directly into the nanotube film, nanotube
material could be lifted up from the surface by the tip without
losing electrical contact to the substrate.

Figure 1 depicts possible nanotube orientations during
different stages of this procedure. From a position of stable
tunneling (Fig. 1A), the STM tip was driven forward into the
nanotube film approximately 100 nm, or until a metallic contact
was formed (Fig. 1B). After retraction of the tip well beyond the
normal tunneling range, continuous electrical contact indicated
that nanotube material now spanned the gap between tip and sample
(Fig 1C). Evenseveral hundred nm above the original tunneling
position, material stuck to the tip for nearly 5% of the trials.
This success rate could not be achieved with nanotubes which do
not have the tendency to form ropes, namely multiwalled nanotubes
or contaminated nanotubes. This fact indicates that adhesion
between a SWNT rope and the tip, as opposed to nanotube
entanglement, is the source of the physical connection.
Conductivity measurements were begun only on SWNT ropes which
remained electrically connected after retracting the STM tip by
its full range of 300 nm. With the feedback disabled, a fine
stepper motor withdrew the tip further from the surface in steps
averaging 2 nm. Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics were
obtained between each motor step until electrical contact was
irreparably broken, at which time currents could only be obtained
by returning the STM tip to approximately the original surface
height. The continuous increase of the tip-to-sample distance
allowed measurement of different lengths of nanotube material.
For some samples, retraction of more than 2 µm occurred before
electrical contact was lost, in agreement with the observed free
length of SWNTs. Although repeating the experiment on the exact
same nanotube was impossible after losing contact, further
measurements by the same technique showed qualitatively similar
behaviors.
The precise nature of the electrical contacts between tip,
SWNT rope, and surface are experimentally difficult to determine.
Only measurements with 500 nm or more of retraction are reported
here, since in these cases electrical transport is unambiguously
from the STM tip to the surface through a SWNT rope. Based on the
morphology of the starting material, the nanotube rope is most
likely entangled at the surface, resulting in a number of good
physical as well as electrical contacts at that end. The
connection at the STM tip, on the other hand, is a presumably a
weakly bound one. Based on the continuous electrical connection
even 2 µm from the sample surface, it is clear that the adhesion
between the nanotube rope and the STM tip is strong. Even so, the
lateral forces, or friction, between the two may be quite weak.
This intuitive picture of the physical contact is in accord with
a sliding electrical contact. We argue that as the tip pulls a
nanotube rope away from the surface, the STM tip-to-nanotube
connection forms a sliding contact, providing for a
length-dependent measurement of electrical transport through the
nanotube rope.
Results
Figure 2 depicts several I-V curves obtained at varying
positions along a nanotube rope. Each curve was found to be
highly reproducible for a given tip position. As the tip moved,
however, the overall magnitude of each I-V curve varied
non-monotonically over as much as an order of magnitude, even for
tip displacements of merely a few nm. This variation in
magnitude, but not shape, of the I-V characteristics is a primary
indicator of the sliding contact between the tip and a SWNT rope:
after each successive tip movement, the slightly altered
electronic coupling at the interface merely rescales the dominant
I-V characteristic. In fact, the curves displayed in Fig. 2 are
exactly identical if each is normalized to its current magnitude
at V = 1 Volt.

Thousands of I-V characteristics were obtained from different
samples, many of which showed the same general, non-linear,
symmetric shape. This dominant characteristic can be understood
as related to graphitic properties (Collins et al. 1997), as
expected for a large rope of nanotubes at room temperature.
Slight asymmetries were also generally observed and are apparent
in Fig. 2, but could be due either to the tubes themselves or to
the STM tip-to-nanotube contact and will not be analyzed further.
In Figure 3 we display pairs of curves from three different
samples indicating departures from the dominant transport
characteristics. For each sample, the first I-V characteristic
was stable andreproducible over hundreds of nm of tip motion
(Figs. 3A, 3B, and 3C). After a particular tip movement, however,
a significantly changed I-V characteristic was recorded (Figs.
3A*, 3B*, 3C*). The transition from one type to the other
occurred over mere nm of tip motion near tip heights of 500 nm,
1950 nm, and 400 nm for samples A, B, and C, respectively. After
these transitions, the new characteristics were equally stable
and reproducible, again over hundreds of nm or until a rope broke
free from the STM tip. Small scaling changes attributed to the
sliding contact were evident both before and after the transition
point. Based on these observations, it is credible that the
measured changes in conductivity arise from the nanotube rope
itself and not the nature of the contact.

Although sample A showed an interesting transition from an
asymmetric to a more symmetric I-V characteristic, samples B and
C show a much more dramatic change. In these two samples, the I-V
characteristic has the familiar shape for positive tip biases but
is then rectified for negative tip biases. Similar rectification
was never observed in the opposite direction for positive biases,
but this missing effect may be an artifact of the experimental
procedure. After each original movement of the tip into the gross
nanotube film we checked for a connecting rope only under
positive tip bias conditions, when in fact a rope may have been
physically connected but conductive only for negative biases.
Analysis and Discussion
Due to the observed nonlinear I-V characteristic, there exists
no true linear resistivity for the nanotube rope. Most transport
measurements in the literature, however, quote resistance values
for various measurement configurations. Calculation of a nominal
resistance is therefore instructive, since a comparison with
other measurements can indicate how many ropes span the
micron-scale gap between the STM tip and the surface in the
present experiment. In Fig. 2, the dominant I-V characteristics
for our samples give a low-bias resistance of 100 kohm. For a
single rope with a typical diameter of 10 to 30 nm, this implies
a nanotube resistivity of 10-2 ohm-cm. This value is
consistent with others reported in the literature (Langer et al.
1996; Thess et al. 1996; Fischer et al. 1997), supporting the
suggestion that only a single rope electrically connects the STM
tip to the surface. But the electrical contact area is, by the
nature of the experiment, poorly defined. This precludes a
quantitative comparison of the data with specific theories, since
the tip-to-tube junction may form a tunneling barrier, a point
contact, or a large area contact.
We argue that the distinct changes in conductivity are due to
the incorporation of a nanotube defect at the transition contact
point. The random spacing and infrequent occurrences of the
observed transitions are in accord with a low density of defects
on the nanotube ropes. Such defects could be expected to cause
extreme changes in the transport behavior as the tip passes
through a nm-sized region. After passing the region, the
transport should not relax but should remain in its altered
state, exactly as we have observed.
Qualitatively our observations of rectification by the
nanotube rope are in excellent agreement with recent theoretical
treatments of defects in carbon nanotubes (Charlier et al. 1996;
Chico et al. 1996a; Chico et al. 1996b; Saito et al. 1996). A
nanotube defect alters the local electronic density of states
N(E), both on the nanotube and possibly for a local area of the
rope. For example, the existence of pentagon-heptagon pairs in
the otherwise perfectly hexagonal carbon lattice introduces sharp
discontinuities in N(E) which have been theoretically shown to
completely block transport currents (Chico et al. 1996b).
Nanotube defects essentially behave as seamless junctions between
otherwise disparate materials, joining for example a metallic
nanotube to a semiconducting one to produce a Schottky barrier.
Depending on the exact geometry of the nanotubes on each side of
the defect, a variety of pure-carbon nanoscale junctions have
been proposed, including the Schottky barrier example given.
Fig. 4 depicts a schematic network for the observed behavior
based on this interpretation. A defect on a nanotube rope,
modeled as a non-linear element, might produce unusual transport
properties as we have measured. Before the STM tip reaches the
defect, the nanotube rope exhibits a graphitic response, as
modeled by a purely resistive network. As the contact slides
further along the nanotube rope, the non-linear element is
incorporated into the current path, rectifying all further
responses. In this way, the local graphitic response of the rope
is dominated by a defect which, at least physically, can be
hundreds of nm from the contact point. A second defect, as shown
in the figure, will simulate the loss of physical contact to the
nanotube rope. With our present apparatus, we are unable to
distinguish between an insulating rope and the loss of physical
contact.

It is important to consider other tip-related artifacts which
could be causing the abrupt transitions between a symmetric I-V
characteristic and a rectifying one. TEM studies of the SWNT
ropes indicate that the ropes tend to twist, suggesting that the
contact area may actually jump from nanotube to adjacent nanotube
within the same rope. However, this type of slippage of the tip
contact point should produce conductivity changes as frequent as
the overall twisting. Experimentally, we observe no such periodic
jumps, but rather a smooth and continuous variation in the I-V
characteristic leading up to a transition. Similar effects could
be caused by contamination or disconnected material interfering
with the tip-to-nanotube contact. However under TEM observation
the outer walls of the SWNT ropes are completely free of such
materials after the purification treatment.
Conclusions
The nonlinear nanotube I-V characteristics presented here hint
at a viable source of nanosized electronic components for future
applications. Because of their size, nanotube devices can be
expected to operate with unusually high speed, high element
density, and excellent thermal dissipation characteristics. If
indeed the nonlinear characteristics are the effects of single
point defects, then the question at hand is how to incorporate
defects and their electronic effects into useful electronic
devices. Two possible paths towards this goal are currently under
investigation (Louie et al).
In one scenario, defects are created in pristine, defect-free
nanotubes in predetermined positions. After positioning a
nanotube on metallic contacts or in a network of other nanotubes,
one employs the local action of an STM tip to damage or
chemically functionalize a section of the tube. With the
development of proper techniques, it may become possible to
choose from the variety of nanotube-based devices which are
theoretically possible.
In a second, less determinate model, the equilibrium
thermodynamic density of defects is employed. The as-grown sample
of entangled tubes will inevitably contain a high density of
randomly arranged device elements, perhaps orders of magnitude
higher than in state-of-the-art Si technology. In this approach,
multiple connections are made to a sample and characterized,
ultimately determining algorithms which can exploit the functions
already existing within the sample. Such a sample might form the
basis of a useful machine, perhaps a computer (Louie et al), with
high speed characteristics.
In conclusion, reproducible electronic conductivities have
been measured on a number of different single-walled nanotube
bundles. We have measured distinct changes in the conductivity as
the active length of the nanotube was increased, suggesting that
different segments of the nanotube exhibit different electronic
properties. The changes occur over very short lengths, suggestive
of point defects in the tube wall itself. As such, the nanotubes
constitute molecular-scale nonlinear electronic devices. The
controlled production or manipulation of nanotubes with these
characteristics could allow for the utilization of these features
in ultraminiature electronic devices and circuits.
Acknowledgments
We thank R. E. Smalley for providing some of the SWNT samples
used in these studies. We also thank M.L Cohen, S.G. Louie, and
V.H. Crespi for beneficial discussions, and N.G. Chopra and D.
Bernaerts for performing TEM studies on our samples. This work
was supported in part by a UC Berkeley Chancellor's Initiative
Grant, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of
Energy, the Office of Naval Research, and the Japan Agency of
Industrial Science and Technology. PGC acknowledges support from
a Helmholz Fellowship, and AZ received support from the Miller
Institute for Basic Research in Science.
References
- Bockrath, M., D. H. Cobden, et al. 1997 "Single
electron transport in ropes of carbon nanotubes." Science
275 1922.
- Charlier, J., T. W. Ebbesen, et al. 1996 "Structural
and electronic properties of pentagon-heptagon pair
defects in carbon nanotubes." Phys. Rev. B 53
11108.
- Chico, L., L. X. Benedict, et al. 1996a "Quantum
conductance of carbon nanotubes with defects." Phys.
Rev. B 54 2600.
- Chico, L., V. H. Crespi, et al. 1996b "Pure carbon
nanoscale devices: nanotube heterojunctions." Phys.
Rev. Lett. 76 971.
- Collins, P. G., A. Zettl, et al. 1997 "Nanotube
nanodevice." Science 278 100.
- Dai, H., E. W. Wong, et al. 1996 "Probing electrical
transport in nanomaterials: conductivity of individual
carbon nanotubes." Science 272 523.
- Dresselhaus, M. S., G. Dresselhaus, et al. (1996). Science
of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes. New York,
Academic Press.
- Fischer, J. E., H. Dai, et al. 1997 "Metallic
resistivity in crystalline ropes of single-wall carbon
nanotubes." Phys Rev. B 55 R4921.
- Hamada, N., S. Sawada, et al. 1992 "New
one-dimensional conductors: graphitic microtubules."
Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 1579.
- Iijima, S. 1991 "Helical microtubules of graphitic
carbon." Nature 354 56.
- Journet, C., W. K. Maser, et al. 1997 "Large-scale
production of single-walled carbon nanotubes by the
electric-arc technique." Nature 388
756.
- Langer, L., L. Stockman, et al. 1994 "Electrical
resistance of a carbon nanotube bundle." J.
Mater. Res. 9 927.
- Langer, L., V. Bayot, et al. 1996 "Quantum transport
in a multiwalled carbon nanotube." Phys. Rev.
Lett. 76 479.
- Louie, S., M. Cohen, and A. Zettl, to be published.
- Mintmire, J. W., B. I. Dunlap, et al. 1992 "Are
fullerene tubules metallic?" Phys. Rev. Lett.
68 631.
- Rao, A. M., E. Richter, et al. 1997
"Diameter-selective raman scattering from
vibrational modes in carbon nanotubes." Science
275 187.
- Saito, R., G. Dresselhaus, et al. 1996 "Tunneling
conductance of connected carbon nanotubes." Phys.
Rev. B 53 2044.
- Song, S. N., X. K. Wang, et al. 1994 "Electronic
properties of graphite nanotubules from galvanomagnetic
effects." Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 697.
- Tans, S. J., M. H. Devoret, et al. 1997 "Individual
single-wall carbon nanotubes as quantum wires." Nature
386 474.
- Thess, A., R. Lee, et al. 1996 "Crystalline ropes of
metallic carbon nanotubes." Science 273
483.
|