Archive for the 'Future Warfare' Category
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on May 14th, 2009
From Azonano: Physicists to Brief Media and Public on Real Science of Antimatter On May 15, 2009, Sony Pictures will release “Angels and Demons,” and bring the world’s largest particle physics laboratory to the silver screen. Based on Dan Brown’s best-selling novel, this major motion picture, starring Tom Hanks and directed by Ron Howard, focuses [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, International organizations, News | 1 Comment »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on April 30th, 2009
Over at Accelerating Future, Michael Anissimov has a post about self-replication in which he seems to find it remarkable that Foresight, among others, can view a world containing mechanical replicators with aplomb: What is remarkable are those that seem to argue, like Ray Kurzweil, the Foresight Institute, and the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology, that humanity [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Future Warfare, Machine Intelligence, Nanotechnology, Open source sensing | 11 Comments »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on March 19th, 2009
In this post I began considering the prognostications in George Friedman’s The Next 100 Years, in light of some of the kinds of changes in technology that might come online during the century. This is obviously hard to do, but imagine trying to predict the geopolitical course of the 20th century without understanding the possibility [...]
Posted in Economics, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Space | 6 Comments »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on March 18th, 2009
What forces are going to shape the world throughout the 21st century? A recent NYT bestseller, The Next 100 Years, by George Friedman, proposes a number of very interesting theories. Friedman is considered to be something of an intellectual maverick, contradicting the conventional wisdom at many points, and very insightful, since in many cases his [...]
Posted in Economics, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Health & longevity, Machine Intelligence | 1 Comment »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on December 23rd, 2008
The following is an edited and revised version of the talk I gave at the Global Catastrophic Risks conference that was held in conjunction with Convergence 08 (and which I reprised for Convergence). I’m posting it here because it seems to me that this is exactly the kind of thing Foresight was founded for: to [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Biosphere, Economics, Energy, Environment, Health, and Safety, Future Warfare, Healing/preserving environment, International organizations, Molecular manufacturing, Nanotechnology | 10 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on November 17th, 2008
Recently announced results of a US national survey on nanotech applications for “human enhancement” show widespread public support for enhancements seen as promising an improvement in human health, but little support for other uses.
Posted in Ethics, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Public participation | 8 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 18th, 2008
Normally this blog focuses on nanotechnology, but it’s also important to stay on top of major advances in related fields such as robotics; the fields will interact in interesting ways. This video of a DARPA-funded project from Boston Dynamics is a must-see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww Watch the whole thing, and use the YouTube version; the one on [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, Machine Intelligence, Robotics | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 25th, 2008
Sonia Arrison over at TechNewsWorld takes on the issues of genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and steering innovation toward responsible uses: “When we look at cells as machines, it makes them very straightforward in the future to design them for very unique utilities,” Venter told participants at DLD. Of course, Venter has often referred to the possibility [...]
Posted in About Foresight, Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation, Security | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 18th, 2008
For many years, Foresight has been pointing out that nanotechnology will be used for surveillance. Now Kevin Mitnick makes a long-term prediction on nanosurveillance. An excerpt: Warrantless Surveillance: The Worst is Yet to Come …Far from censuring the president, most of Congress seems completely unconcerned by the issue of warrantless surveillance. And telecom companies are [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation, Robotics, Security | 5 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 14th, 2007
As we head into the weekend, a lighter note: Did you miss the 4th European Futurists Conference in Lucerne in October? So did I. But now we can spend the holidays enjoying Quicktime videos and hear some forecasts that may surprise those who think Europeans are less future-oriented than those in Asia and the U.S. [...]
Posted in Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Meetings & Conferences, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 13th, 2007
Nanowerk brings our attention to a story at Forbes.com looking at anticipated developments in sensing and monitoring: At their annual meeting this fall in Montreal, there was little of the traditional talk among the international privacy people about the nuts and bolts of data protection. Instead, there were urgent and distressed discussions about “uberveillance,” “ambient [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 4th, 2007
Jamais Cascio offers four nanotechnology policy scenarios over at CRN, looking at options resulting from two axes: centralized vs. decentralized, and precautionary vs. proactionary. His two decentralized scenarios describe some territory similar to that which Foresight is investigating as part of our Decentralized Physical Security project: The third scenario, combining Distributed rule-making and Proactionary technology [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Future Warfare, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, New Institutions, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation, Security | 3 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on November 16th, 2007
In their current issue, the folks who usually focus on nuclear war take a look ahead to nanotech war, via a book review by CRN’s Mike Treder of the book Military Nanotechnology: Potential Applications and Preventive Arms Control by Jürgen Altmann. Deeply researched and carefully worded, Military Nanotechnology is an overview of an emerging technology [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Reports & publications, Security | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on November 14th, 2007
Although it is distressing to read the headline from ITAR-TASS “Russia to design nanotechnology weapons — commander“, when one reads the text, at first these “weapons” sound more like defensive protection than offensive weapons: Principally new weapons based on nanotechnology will be designed in Russia within 15 years for combating radiation, chemical and biological terrorism, [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Future Warfare, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 10 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on October 19th, 2007
Registration for Foresight’s Nov. 3-4 Vision Weekend focused on nanotechnology and other advanced technologies — traditionally restricted to Foresight Senior Associates — is being opened to the general public this year as an experiment. Space is limited and participants are advised to register very soon. To warm up for our Sat/Sun afternoon unconference, in the [...]
Posted in About Foresight, Artificial Molecular Machines, Bionanotechnology, Biosphere, Computational nanotechnology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Foresight News, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Intellectual Property, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Life extension, Machine Intelligence, Meetings & Conferences, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanobiotechnology, Nanobusiness, Nanojobs, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Public participation, Roadmaps, Security, Senior Associates | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 21st, 2007
The Heritage Foundation portrays itself as a conservative think tank, and by gosh, they are! Specifically, they are conservative on the longer term prospects for nanotechnology: In the more distant future, combining nanocomputers, sensors, and nanomechanical architectures into one system would make possible autonomously targeted and guided projectiles, such as bullets and rockets. Nanotechnology could [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 16th, 2007
We are very pleased to announce the dates and location of the 2007 Foresight Vision Weekend, to be held November 3-4 in at Yahoo! headquarters here in Silicon Valley. We’ve learned that you demand a highly interactive meeting, so this year we’ll be experimenting with a new format including big chunks of time for the [...]
Posted in Foresight News, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Life extension, Machine Intelligence, Meetings & Conferences, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanojobs, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Public participation, Security, Senior Associates | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 13th, 2007
In the postal mail today was the paper copy of a 6-7 July 2006 conference report: “The Risk Governance of Nanotechnology: Recommendations for Managing a Global Issue” (link to PDF) held at the Swiss Re Centre for Global Dialogue last summer. This well-run and highly international meeting is the highest profile meeting to include consideration [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Future Warfare, International organizations, Meetings & Conferences, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Reports & publications | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 30th, 2007
Small Times brings word of advances in making longer carbon nanotubes. The company involved, Nanocomp Technologies, reminds us why these materials are so intriguing: Individual nanotubes have extraordinary properties as they are: Strong – 100 times stronger than steel. Lightweight – 30 percent lighter than aluminum. Conductive – conduct electricity as efficiently as copper, and [...]
Posted in Biosphere, Future Warfare, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanotech, Nanotechnology | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 2nd, 2007
These days Foresight is focused on our Technology Roadmap and policy initiatives such as Open Source Physical Security. But we still have our visionary side, shown in a Fortune profile of Foresight advisor Ray Kurzweil, which also features Foresight director and X PRIZE founder Peter Diamandis: If you went around saying that in a couple [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Memetics, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 1 Comment »
|
|