Archive for the 'Future Warfare' Category
Posted by Christine Peterson on April 19th, 2007
BusinessWeek.com reports that nanotechnology is the next big thing in Russia: Russia will pour over $1 billion into equipment for nanotechnology research over the next three years as it uses massive oil and gas export earnings to diversify an economy now heavily dependent on raw materials, First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said Wednesday. “(Nanotechnology) [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 7 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on April 5th, 2007
In the long term, we’ll need effective security techniques for advanced nanotechnology-based systems. This will take a while to figure out, so come help us do it at an upcoming open source conference, Penguicon: Open Source-style Security for the Whole Physical World Christine Peterson, Bruce Schneier One of the biggest problems society faces this century [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Environment, Health, and Safety, Foresight News, Future Warfare, Meetings & Conferences, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Public participation, Security | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 19th, 2007
USA Today covers the challenging but environmentally important issue of making batteries: inefficient, nasty things today that need to get a lot better and cheaper. And they will, with nanotech developed by these two MIT professors: [Prof. Angela] Belcher’s virus-assembled batteries are thin, transparent sheets that look like plastic wrap. They could be used to [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotechnology | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 6th, 2007
Nanowerk covers a February 2007 report from the U.S. Defense Science Board titled 21st Century Strategic Technology Vectors (pdf). Excerpts: DOD must also keep abreast of the most rapidly changing and emerging technologies as a necessary complement to the mission-driven perspective that is the focus of this report. Today these include bio-, info-, and nano-technologies. [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Reports & publications | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on February 26th, 2007
Though we do not always agree with Gregor Wolbring, his column on nanotech and the military reminds us of a very difficult potential problem: The start of a nano arms race, and the lack of willingness to regulate potential synthetic biology through the modification of existing treaties or the application of existing treaties or the [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, International organizations, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on February 1st, 2007
Long-time nanotechnology trackers have assumed that nanotech will be useful for chemical and biological defense, and sure enough, at least one national government is exploring this issue. See the website for the Nanotechnology Initiative at the Special Projects Office at the Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense, which falls under the [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 26th, 2007
Speigel Online reports that nanotechnology work at the University of Texas is leading toward a nanotech “exoskeleton” for military use: Now the superpower’s military is hoping to profit from the findings of nanotechnologist Ray Baughman from the University of Texas. He has managed to develop chemically grown nanotubes, which are like tiny muscles. The microscopically [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, Research | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 9th, 2007
Somehow we missed the original launch of the 12-minute video describing MIT’s Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, funded by the U.S. Army. It includes animated sequences depicting combat scenarios and how nanotechnologies could be used in response. Some of these are pretty science-fictiony, which means they have at least some chance of being accurate projections. The [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 29th, 2006
The Institute for the Future, in a UK-funded study published on the Stanford website, presents eleven outlooks for nanotechnology over the next 50 years: • Better drug delivery through nanotechnology • Carbon nanotubes and lighter vehicles • The coming nanoshell revolution in oncology • The dream of biochemical nanocomputing • Manufacturing with programmable materials “Advent [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Bionanotechnology, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nanobiotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Reports & publications, Reviews, Security | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 4th, 2006
A new book by German physicist Jürgen Altmann of Dortmund University looks at Military Nanotechnology: Potential Applications and Preventive Arms Control (Routledge, 2006). Both near-term and long-term applications are examined. From the abstract: NT applications will likely pervade all areas of the military…By using NT to miniaturise sensors, actuators and propulsion, autonomous systems (robots) could [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Artificial Molecular Machines, Ethics, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation, Reports & publications, Security, Space | 12 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on November 17th, 2006
It had to happen somewhere: the first country to publicly state they are planning to use nanotechnology in weapons is…Israel. Before now, to my knowledge, only defensive uses have been discussed in public. From the Sydney Morning Herald: Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has given the green light for Israel to set up a special office [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | 10 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on November 10th, 2006
We are only in the very early stages of nanotechnology bringing new abilities to DNA reading, but the latest such nanotech advance comes from New Mexico Tech profs Peng Zhang and Snezna Rogelj, described in an article by George Zamora: NM Tech Researchers Develop Nanomaterial Bio-sensor New Mexico Tech researchers have developed a highly sensitive [...]
Posted in Ethics, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotechnology | 3 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 8th, 2006
The U.S. Navy’s Thomas Vandermolen looks at defense aspects of advanced nanotech in a footnoted paper over at Nanotechnology Now. He argues against a do-nothing strategy: Given MNT’s tremendous potential for both peaceful and violent applications, controlling it with a “do nothing” strategy is analogous to providing nuclear reactors to every country under the assumption [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, Opinion | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 31st, 2006
From The Chosun Ilbo we learn of a new collaborative effort on nanotechnology between South Korea and…North Korea: South and North Korean scholars are holding a conference on nanotechnology in the North’s Mt. Kumgang resort. For three days from Monday, participants will exchange results of their research and discuss ways to cooperate in improving education [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 7 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 15th, 2006
Nanotech Takes on Homeland Terror is the title of a piece by Josh Wolfe and Dan van den Bergh over at Forbes.com. It describes current and near-term applications for nanotech in detecting biowarfare agents and in protecting soldiers: The DOD believed in nano long before the term was mainstream…Current detection tools using nanotechnology allow high-speed [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Nanotechnology, Security | 3 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 17th, 2006
The leading semiconductor equipment industry association has taken a strong stand (one-page pdf) against new U.S. nanotech export controls: “SEMI is concerned about possible new export controls on nanotechnology products and cautions against further controls until this technology is better defined. “Nanotechnology should not be controlled simply because it is nanotechnology. This label is often [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Economics, Future Warfare, Government programs, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 21st, 2006
Earth & Sky brings us comments on nanosurveillance: “Nanotechnology experts have suggested that nano sensors — tiny devices too small to see with the unaided eye and able to monitor sounds and physical conditions — could be put into paint and sprayed on a wall. “David Guston [Director of the Center for Nanotechnology in Society [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Openness/Privacy, Questions for Nanodot Users | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 14th, 2006
Foresight director Glenn Reynolds writes at TCS Daily about a major piece now running at Technology Review on biowarfare and bioterror. Basically it sounds as though we have gotten ourselves into a situation where biotech can now be used pretty easily by terrorists, exotic bioweapons (perhaps targeted on ethnic groups) are within the reach of [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 16th, 2005
Iddo Ganuth of IsraCast reports: “An Israeli company has recently tested one of the most shock-resistant materials known to man. Five times stronger than steel and at least twice as strong as any impact-resistant material currently in use as protective gear, the new nano-based material is on its way to becoming the armor of the [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on October 21st, 2005
In an article in Salon titled “The (really scary) soldier of the future — Thanks to nanotechnology, he’ll be a lethal superman who can heal himself“, Alan Goldstein writes: “Based simply on the projects posted for public consumption, the ISN [Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies] is busy creating a soldier of the future who will be [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Opinion | 1 Comment »
|
|