Foresight Institute Logo
Image of nano

Archive for the 'News' Category

EuroNanoForum to include medical nanorobotics

Posted by Christine Peterson on April 8th, 2005

EuroNanoForum 2005 will cover a number of advanced topics including "nanorobots in surgery." The timeframe of focus is 2020. Evening activities include a public debate. Read more for their most recent message.

Josh Wolfe: premature to regulate nanotech

Posted by Christine Peterson on April 7th, 2005

Foresight's Judy Conner points us at an essay by Josh Wolfe at "Nanotech is still in its infancy, and scientists are just beginning to understand how it can be used to improve products and processes in fields ranging from semiconductors to medicine and energy. The last thing it needs is a 'societal debate' and intense government scrutiny. How can you intelligently discuss and regulate something that is still in the discovery and development stage, before it really exists in a practical manufacturing sense?"

German nanoTruck causes envy

Posted by Christine Peterson on April 7th, 2005

Germany has a traveling nanotech roadshow called the nanoTruck, apparently the brainchild of nanopromoter and Federal Minister for Education and Research, Ms. Edelgard Bulmahn. There's a form to use to request a visit by the nanoTruck — do they ship to the U.S.? (As for who is envious, that would be me.)

Top seven NNI nanosystems projects

Posted by Christine Peterson on April 6th, 2005

Foresight Senior Associate Tihamer Toth-Fejel, a research engineer at General Dynamics, reports that he was able to locate 43 "nanosystems" studies in the list of NNI funded projects, some of which he reports look "somewhat promising" for molecular manufacturing. Read more to see his choice of the top seven projects funded.

Thirty years before Feynman

Posted by Christine Peterson on April 5th, 2005

In his talk at the recent Nanoethics conference, Michael Bennett of RPI brought our attention to a 1929 essay by J.D. Bernal which predicts a technology where physics, chemistry, and mechanics fuse and result in an ability to build to molecular specifications. Read More for excerpts.

Help verifying NNI-funded nanomachine/nanosystems?

Posted by Christine Peterson on April 3rd, 2005

Mihail Roco, Senior NSF Advisor on nanotech, gave a plenary talk at the Nanoethics conference recently. One of his slides was on synthesis and control of nanomachines, and noted that about 300 projects had been funded in 2004. Later he referred me to two websites: the NSE site where he said were listed 50-60 NNI-funded centers focused on 3rd-4th generation nanomachines/nanosystems, and the NNI site where a search on awards would show 300-400 grants with nanomachine or nanosystem in the title or abstract. Read More for the results and request for help.

NNI plans for 3D nanosystems, molecular nanosystems

Posted by Christine Peterson on April 3rd, 2005

In a talk at the recent Nanoethics conference, NNI's Mihail Roco described plans for third and fourth generation nanotechnology, and very briefly sketched a fifth generation — robotics and guided assembly. This was supplemented by paper copies of an article he wrote for AIChE Journal. Long-time readers of Nanodot will find the terminology new but the concepts familiar. Read More for a summary.

1st ‘Nano-Biotechnology’ collaborative multimedia

Posted by RobertBradbury on March 31st, 2005

Nanopolis writes "The "Exploring Nano-Biotechnology" multimedia encyclopedia, the 4th tome of the Nanopolis e-collaborative series will be worldwide available in March 2006. Containing extremely intuitive multimedia explanations of the concepts, improved analytic techniques, deeper understanding of diseases, deciphering of cellular mechanisms, novel drug development techniques, summary charts show the major players associated with each concept along with the references necessary for further insight. These topics along with other 4000 computer generated films and e-courses from the previous volumes on Synchrotron, Neutrons and Nanotechnology will be accesible through the Nanopolis e-learning platform giving European, American and Asian academic environments access to the largest multimedia educational source on nanoscale science and engineering. Hundreds of world-wide actors contribute to its finalizing through the e-collaborative Nanopolis platform at"

Nano-Hive Nanospace Simulator 1.1.0 Released

Posted by RobertBradbury on March 31st, 2005

bhelfrich writes "Nano-Hive version 1.1.0 for win32-x86 is now available for download. *nix distros will be made available in the coming weeks.

This release adds support for running multiple, multi-threaded simulations simultaneously, each able to access multiple Physical Interaction plugins.

We've also added new plugins.

  • MPQC_SClib – This plugin encapsulates the functionality of the Scientific Computing Toolkit (SC) used by the Massively Parallel Quantum Chemistry Program (MPQC).
  • OpenBabelImportExport – This Data Import/Export plugin adds the ability to read and write many new file types by encapsulating the OpenBabel library.
  • SocketsControl – Control Nano-Hive via a TCP socket with this Simulation Control plugin.
  • BondCalculator – This Physical Interaction plugin discovers molecules in the simulation space and specifies bonds to describe them.
  • BasicCellTraverser – This Entity Traversal plugin divides the simulation space up into sub-cells for multi-threaded calculation.

Also included in this release is an alpha version of the HiveKeeper Graphical User Interface for Nano-Hive ( The capabilities of the alpha version includes visualization of the molecular structures even while the simulation is running.

Visit to learn more. Nano-Hive's open source development and distributions are hosted at"

Editors comment — but when will the software be available for non-windows systems? "*nix" distros in coming weeks sounds rather vague.

UVa MRSEC receives Visual Communications Award

Posted by RobertBradbury on March 10th, 2005

UVa MRSEC Center for Nanoscopic Materials Design writes "Press Release from UVa?s Center for Nanoscopic Materials Design; For Immediate Release:

UVa MRSEC & Paladin Pictures Recognized for Nanotechnology Education Video.

Charlottesville, Virginia – March 1, 2005 – The University of Virginia's Center for Nanoscopic Materials Design and Paladin Pictures, Inc. have received The Communicator Awards' Award of Distinction for their creation of a video program entitled The NANO Revolution. UVa's Center for Nanscopic Materials Design is a National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored Materials Research Science & Engineering Center (MRSEC). The NANO Revolution is a seven-minute educational video, filmed primarily in the research labs of the UVa MRSEC and designed to introduce the concept of nanotechnology and its applications to a target audience of middle- and high-school students and the general public. The Communicator Awards is an annual, international competition honoring excellence in visual communications. The Award of Distinction formally recognizes the UVa MRSEC/Paladin Pictures production for exceeding industry standards.

More… �

New Nanotech Comic Strip Stars

Posted by RobertBradbury on March 10th, 2005

Arya writes "Grey Goos' Nanotech Comic Strip Looks at the Light Side of the Human/Technology Relationship

The First Comic for Nanoheads Now on NanoApex

March 10, 2005 – As our story begins, a group of highly advanced nanobots, built for hazardous duty and dubbed "Grey Goos," have escaped from the National Transistor Assembly Labs. These little critters, each with a different technical specialty and a distinct personality, look rather like drops of soft ice cream in hiking boots. They end up in New York City, living in a loft with Dorothea (Dot) Kalm and Globo Bill, a couple of "constructs" who also have escaped from the same lab. Meanwhile, scientists at the lab have created a nanocop they've named Blue Goo, whose job is to round up the wayward Grey Goos and return them to the lab.

Read entire release here
Read comic strip here"

Ed. note in extended copy.

Nanoethics conference: Day 1

Posted by Christine Peterson on March 3rd, 2005

Very quick summary from the first full day of the University of South Carolina nanoethics conference: many calls for greater and earlier ("upstream") participation by social scientists and ethicists in nanotechnology R&D decisions, repeated evidence of continued confusion between molecular manufacturing and gray goo, much concern about the possibility of human enhancement, a few admissions that ethicists may have a conflict of interest in taking funds from agencies tasked with developing the technology they are questioning. Repeated assertions that the public does not trust scientists — in Europe. Audience mostly academic/gov't social scientists/ethicists with very strong European presence, almost no Asian presence, very few nanoscientists/nanotechnologists. Fun discussions in the hallways; as is so often the case (including at meetings I put together), many of the best parts of the conference take place informally. Some of the most interesting talks will be on Days 2 and 3.–CP

Nanologue: European dialogue on nanotech benefits, risks

Posted by Christine Peterson on March 3rd, 2005

Judy Conner at Foresight brings to our attention: "A new European Commissioned-funded project, Nanologue, is launched this week, bringing together leading researchers from across Europe to facilitate an international dialogue on the social, ethical and legal benefits and potential impacts of nanoscience and nanotechnologies…Nanotechnology could have a radical impact across many fields, from drug delivery to textile manufacture, environmental monitoring to microprocessing. With potential social and economic benefits will come responsibilities for ensuring social, ethical and legal concerns are met while enabling competitive advantage for European business."

European Master in Nanoscience & Nanotechnolog

Posted by RobertBradbury on March 3rd, 2005

Rick writes "The European Commission has recognised the European Nanoscience & Nanotechnology Master of Science course as an Erasmus Mundus Master. Participating in this course are Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands), Leiden University (The Netherlands), Leuven University (Belgium), Dresden University of Technology (Germany) and Chalmers University of Technology (Sweden). In the near future, France will also join the consortium. Background information follows…

Microsoft invests in AFM-based memory chip

Posted by Christine Peterson on March 1st, 2005

Janet Rae-Dupree of the San Jose Business Journal reports that Microsoft is an investor in Nanochip, which uses AFM arrays to read and write chips with up to a terabit per square inch. They're not at the atomic level yet, but wait: "While the term 'atomic force' may make it sound like the data is being stored by manipulating individual atoms, the truth is that each individual bit is made up of hundreds of molecules, [CEO Gordon Knight] says. 'That's the beauty of this technology,' he says. 'It does have legs. We can see it getting finer and finer in the future with better tips and better media.' " Credit

Germany leads EU in nanotech

Posted by Christine Peterson on February 28th, 2005

Elaine Tschorn and Judy Conner at Foresight bring to our attention this report from Campus Germany: "Currently, more than half of Europeís nanotechnology companies are from Germany and of all the patent applications from across the world, German researchers are only beaten by the Americans in terms of quantity…In total, the Government spends around 300 million euros a year on nanotechnology, a figure which, relatively, is higher than that in the USA."

UK Science minister acts on Royal Society nanotech study

Posted by Christine Peterson on February 25th, 2005

From "UK Science Minister Lord Sainsbury was responding to a year-long nanotech study conducted by the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, which recommended precaution and regulation of the controversial industry…Lord Sainsbury pledged a review of current safety regulations to ensure the safeguarding of people's health and the environment, and announced a new cross-government group to co-ordinate all aspects of research into nanoscience to underpin safety assessments." This does not sound much like what one activist group had hoped for (see Read More below). UPDATE: Here's the BBC view.

Free “Soft Nanomachine Science” report & other Asian Nano News

Posted by Christine Peterson on February 25th, 2005

Those of you trying to track what is going on in nanotech in Asia should visit our friends over at Asian Technology Information Program and monitor their Nano News page, which has some of their nano reports posted free, including Soft Nanomachine Science: "Although there are many unknown factors, it is possible to design a simple soft nanomachine. However, applications for soft nanomachines have not been developed and the technology is still at a very basic research stage." If you can justify it economically, get a subscription and read them all.

Your Co. within Nanotech encyclopedia

Posted by RobertBradbury on February 25th, 2005

Nanopolis writes "Would you like to have your company presentation included in the first and only multimedia encyclopedia on nanotech? (see an example: ) with your technology explained in a few seconds? (see an example: )

Then, you shouldnít miss the ìExploring Nanotechnologyî Encyclopedia & Virtual Show Case expected for world-wide release in May.

For more details about our initiative and your benefits, please refer to

Looking forward to hearing from you,
Christian Norman
Chief Editor
Nanopolis encyclopedia series"

Nanosystems engineering degree program announced

Posted by Christine Peterson on February 24th, 2005

The first U.S. Nanosystems Engineering degree program has been announced, and not perhaps where one would expect it: "The Louisiana Board of Regents granted final approval Thursday for Louisiana Tech to offer the nanosystems engineering degree program, the first such program in the nation." It sounds as though the mechanical engineers had a hand in this, which is encouraging.
But as an MIT alum, where nanosystems work first started back in the late '70s, I am disappointed that the Institute of Technology doing this starts with an L instead of an M. Must the future of nanotech be in Ruston instead of Cambridge?