Archive for the 'Opinion' Category
Posted by Christine Peterson on October 17th, 2007
There’s an arms race between government patent offices and patent filers assisted by private law firms. The folks who work for the former get paid a lot less than the those who work for the latter. This leads to a continual drain away from government review of patent applications toward private generation of patent applications. [...]
Posted in Economics, Government programs, Intellectual Property, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 3 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 19th, 2007
Alan Shalleck of NanoClarity writes over at Nanotechnology Now on how the U.S. should go about planning its future federal funding of nanotech. Excerpts: It is time to explore what the next three to five year national nanotechnology funding allocation will look like. We have already benefited from two multiple-year, multibillion-dollar Presidentially-endorsed Federal programs and [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation, Roadmaps | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 7th, 2007
Babak Parviz of University of Washington, named by Technology Review as one of this year’s outstanding innovators under the age of 35, writes in the Sept/Oct issue (free reg req’d) about self-assembly: In nature, components “self-assemble” to yield complex functional systems. Inspired in part by this observation, a number of research groups are working to [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 31st, 2007
Science Daily brings news of the future of transportation as nanotechnology changes how we make our products, described in the book Transport Communications. An excerpt from Science Daily: By introducing nanotechnology, the authors suggest, goods could be produced and distributed locally, limiting the amount of worldwide transport that takes place annually. Whether discussing virtual reality-based [...]
Posted in Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 28th, 2007
“Fun” is not the first word that comes to mind when the topic of ethics comes up, but the new book Nanoethics: the Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology manages to include a surprising amount of it. Topics include the end of biological aging, body enhancement, privacy, military use, exponential manufacturing, space development, AI, and [...]
Posted in Ethics, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion, Reports & publications | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 24th, 2007
There seem to already be an awful lot of nanotechnology and nanoscience journals out there, but ACS feels there’s room for another: ACS Nano. Editor Paul Weiss — who does “molecular motor-driven assembly“, which sounds fascinating — explains: One of the great traditions of the chemical sciences is that one’s work can be reproduced anywhere [...]
Posted in Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion, Reports & publications | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 23rd, 2007
We hear so much about possible environmental concerns with respect to nanoparticles that it is a joy to have David Berube bring to our attention the upcoming EPA conference on Pollution Prevention through Nanotechnology, Sept. 25-26, which may possibly still be accepting poster presentations: Representatives from industry, academia, non-governmental organizations, and government are invited to [...]
Posted in Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Meetings & Conferences, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 13th, 2007
Nanotech experiments using real molecules are expensive and slow. Progress in nanotechnology would be greatly increased by highly advanced software truly able to model how molecules interact to make materials, devices, and systems. What are the odds of highly advanced software — machine intelligence — being developed any time soon? Explore this question at the [...]
Posted in Complexity, Machine Intelligence, Meetings & Conferences, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion, Public participation | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 10th, 2007
Here’s a cheerful note on which to end our week: Most of us would like to reduce the need for experimentation on animals, but the question has been how to do it without increasing risks to humans. Now nanotech is being considered as a possible route, in a new conference sponsored by IoN (there does [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Foresight Kudos, Future Medicine, Meetings & Conferences, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 7th, 2007
Foresight president Pearl Chin brings our attention to an interview of Sanjay Gupta in Life Extension magazine. It sounds as though his new book Chasing Life includes coverage of nanotechnology. Excerpts from the interview: Turn on any television in the world—Beijing, Chicago, Tel Aviv, Rome, Los Angeles, or Tokyo—and you will find Dr. Sanjay Gupta [...]
Posted in Future Medicine, Life extension, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 7 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 2nd, 2007
The new book Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology is now out. From the press release: Examining the impact of nanotechnology on society, “Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology”…offers incisive essays on the potential risks and rewards of applications of nanotechnology written by both proponents and critics of this burgeoning technology. [...]
Posted in Ethics, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 12th, 2007
The University of South Carolina has released a survey of nanotechnology researchers’ views on various nanotech issues. For example, most agreed that: Nanotechnology will draw more students into science, engineering and math than would otherwise have chosen to study in these fields. I think this is already true — after all, students have been reading [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Future Medicine, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation, Reports & publications | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 11th, 2007
The U.S. National Academy of Engineering wants input on what should be the Grand Challenges in engineering over the next century. Let’s let them know: nanotechnology! Specifically, nanotech leading toward, and achieving, productive nanosystems. Heck, they can just follow the Technology Roadmap for Productive Nanosystems. The IEEE has a summary. You have until August 17, [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Government programs, Memetics, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Public participation, Roadmaps | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 26th, 2007
Marvin Hofberg of the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine sends info on nanotechnology for medicine and longevity: Among the scientific and medical phenomena unveiled at the Eighth Congress that are projected to revolutionize the delivery of healthcare and, as a result, improve the quality and extend the quantity of the human lifespan: • Nanobots, fleets [...]
Posted in Bionanotechnology, Future Medicine, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 22nd, 2007
Today’s San Jose Mercury News — the newspaper of Silicon Valley — features a guest editorial by Wirt Cook, IBM vice president and senior state executive, on the proposed Patent Reform Act, titled “Patent Reform Act best way to protect, foster innovation”: Berman’s bill will enable private-citizen-experts to help patent examiners research the novelty of [...]
Posted in Economics, Intellectual Property, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 18th, 2007
Those of us who spend our days looking at innovation would do well to look at the other side now and then. The New Yorker gives us a chance with a book review by Steven Shapin of the book “The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900” (Oxford) by David Edgerton. He [...]
Posted in Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Reviews | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 15th, 2007
Nanotech Briefs has announced its Nano 50 award winners for 2007, in the categories of Innovators, Products, and Technologies. (Full disclosure: I was a judge again this year.) Great to see Zyvex on the list. Don’t see your favorites? Maybe they weren’t nominated. Don’t let that happen for the Foresight Institute Feynman Prizes; nominate your [...]
Posted in Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion, Public participation | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 11th, 2007
Some sunscreens contain simple nanomaterials: nanoparticles of zinc oxide or titanium dioxide. Sunscreens have had these for decades, but the particles used to be bigger, which is why lifeguards at the beach used to have white noses. Now the particles are smaller, so the sunscreens are transparent. Applying the “nanotechnology” label to these products is [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 3 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 7th, 2007
In the Edigest email from Nanotechnology.com, we found the interview below with a young researcher whose work has been mentioned here before. Normally we don’t reprint items in their entirety, but I could not find this on the Nanotechnology.com website, or elsewhere on the web, so here it is. Its appearance in the Edigest was [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanotechnology, Opinion | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 1st, 2007
The May/June Technology Review (free reg. req’d) features an essay by philosopher Roger Scruton attempting to examine the ethical issues of highly advanced technologies. While the focus is on biotech, nanotech is hinted at: …why cannot machines be produced as humans are now produced, by self-reproduction? Why not indeed. They could, in principle. Scruton makes [...]
Posted in Ethics, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Science Fiction | 3 Comments »
|
|