Archive for the 'Nanotechnology Politics' Category
Posted by Stephanie C on March 29th, 2013
In anticipation of Eric Drexler’s new book, Forbes contributor Bruce Dorminey interviews him about the meaning of nanotechnology and its revolutionary prospects. Selected excerpt: … In what fields would APM cause the most pronounced economic disruption and the collapse of global supply chains to more local chains? The digital revolution had far-reaching effects on information [...]
Posted in Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM), Bionanotechnology, Computational nanotechnology, Economics, Energy, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Productive Nanosystems | No Comments »
Posted by Stephanie C on February 28th, 2013
The advent of new technologies is typically followed by new government regulation, and in the absence of data, fear-based reactionism can have far too much influence on policy. Quality research studies on real risks and impacts of nanoscale technologies can help lead to legitimate scientific consensus and appropriate regulation. Engineered nanoparticles draw particular attention, because [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotechnology Politics, Research | 2 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on February 12th, 2013
An interview with Foresight Co-Founder and Past President Christine Peterson covering both the current state and the future prospects of nanotechnology is available on Youtube.
Posted in About Foresight, Abuse of Advanced Technology, Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM), Bionanotechnology, Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Foresight News, Foresight News, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Healing/preserving environment, Health & longevity, Life extension, Machine Intelligence, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | No Comments »
Posted by Stephanie C on October 29th, 2012
Too much reliance on opportunity-based research could significantly hinder scientific advancement. We have the ability now to explore the specifics of potential future technologies, and the knowledge gained could, in turn, add useful and possibly surprising priorities for research today.
Posted in Government programs, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanotech, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 3 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on January 28th, 2012
A National Academy of Sciences panel has recommended a four-part research effort focused on preventing and managing any potential health and environmental risks of nanomaterials.
Posted in Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Health & longevity, Media Mentions, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on October 25th, 2011
The Singularity University Executive Program recently took on the challenges of advanced nanotech: Nanotechnology: How should we evaluate the environmental impact of human-made machines that are too small to see? What limits should be placed on self-replicating nanodevices? What defenses should we institute against malevolent uses of such technology? These questions were asked by Marc [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Artificial Molecular Machines, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Future Warfare, Meetings & Conferences, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanobusiness, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation, Questions for Nanodot Users, Robotics | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on August 23rd, 2011
A green nanotechnology roadmap released by the American Chemical Society describes the opportunities and barriers to developing commercial applications of nanomaterials that present little threat of harm to health and the environment, and concludes with an action agenda to more forward.
Posted in Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Productive Nanosystems, Reports & publications, Roadmaps | 1 Comment »
Posted by Jim Lewis on April 10th, 2011
Research showing a toxic effect of silver nanoparticles on nitrogen-fixing bacteria in Arctic soil demonstrates the need for more research on nanoparticle environment, health, and safety.
Posted in Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Healing/preserving environment, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Research | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on March 23rd, 2011
UK scientists use mechanical force to manipulate silicon dimers on a silicon surface as a first step toward automated atomically precise manufacture of three-dimensional nanostructures.
Posted in Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM), Found On Web, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Research | 4 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on March 17th, 2011
Will proposals to establish criteria for green nanotechnology foster growth of nanotechnology innovation?
Posted in Economics, Energy, Environment, Health, and Safety, Found On Web, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Meetings & Conferences, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanojobs, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Opinion, Questions for Nanodot Users | 13 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on December 24th, 2010
Senior Associate Alvin Steinberg suggests that we portray the nanotech race as in part a security race involving quantum computing.
Posted in About Foresight, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Questions for Nanodot Users, Security | 10 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on December 6th, 2010
Research and Science Education Subcommittee Chairman Dan Lipinski (IL-03) expressed his strong support for the National Nanotechnology Initiative’s draft Strategic Plan, in particular its focus on ensuring that America’s substantial investment in nanotech research and development is turned into new companies, products, and jobs.
Posted in Economics, Energy, Government programs, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanojobs, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Press Releases | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on November 5th, 2010
US National Nanotechnology Initiative wants your comments on its strategic plan.
Posted in Economics, Energy, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanobusiness, Nanojobs, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation, Reports & publications | 5 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 24th, 2010
Nanodot normally focuses on longer-term nanotechnologies such as molecular manufacturing, but we do like to keep an eye on how different countries compare to each other in nanotech and technology in general. Below is an excerpt from a recent Lux Research announcement; you can read the full PDF here: U.S. Risks Losing Global Leadership in [...]
Posted in Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nanobusiness, Nanojobs, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 6 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 11th, 2010
Many of you will recall Bill Joy’s famous article in Wired called Why the future doesn’t need us, where he expressed concern about various technologies including advanced nanotech. Apparently he gave an update of his views on this in his talk for TED, viewable here. An excerpt: So if we can address, use technology, help [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Security | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 21st, 2010
Not able to attend the Open Science Summit on July 29-31 in Berkeley, California? We’ll miss you, but you can watch the conference live at: http://fora.tv/live/open_science/open_science_summit_2010 Put it on your calendar now! Or we’ll hope to see you in person, especially for the session where I’m speaking: “Safety and Security Concerns, Open Source Biodefense” at [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Foresight News, Meetings & Conferences, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Open source sensing, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation, Security | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 4th, 2010
Foresight Feynman Prize winner Nadrian Seeman will share the $1 million Kavli Prize in nanoscience with IBM’s Don Eigler. From the SciAm blog by Katie Moisse: Donald Eigler from IBM’s Almaden Research Center in San Jose, Calif., and Nadrian Seeman from New York University will jointly accept the nanoscience prize for illuminating the basic units of [...]
Posted in About Foresight, Artificial Molecular Machines, Bionanotechnology, Foresight Kudos, Foresight News, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Research | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 1st, 2010
The U.S. President’s Council on Advisors on Science and Technology requested public input on a number of manufacturing topics including “molecular-level, atomically precise production.” Foresight joined with our sister organization IMM to produce a statement on Atomically Precise Manufacturing, now posted on the OpenPCAST site, with public voting and commenting still continuing, so join in the [...]
Posted in About Foresight, Energy, Foresight News, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Health & longevity, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Public participation, Questions for Nanodot Users, Reports & publications | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 26th, 2010
Bill McDonald brings to our attention the U.S. Congressional campaign of Mike Stopa, a Harvard nanotechnologist and physicist. This is probably the first time that a nanotechnologist has run for Congress. However, his profession may not get much attention, as his campaign is focusing on other issues. It will be interesting to see whether, as [...]
Posted in Nanotechnology Politics | 12 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 10th, 2010
The Mark, “Canada’s daily online forum for news, commentary, and debate,” has published a commentary that primarily takes a negative view of the use of nanotech (or any tech) for life extension: Extreme life extension raises other interesting, yet troubling questions. Significant life extension could have serious implications for individual identity; what if we change [...]
Posted in Bionanotechnology, Ethics, Future Medicine, Healing/preserving environment, Health & longevity, Life extension, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 19 Comments »
|
|