Archive for the 'Nanotechnology Politics' Category
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 10th, 2010
The Mark, “Canada’s daily online forum for news, commentary, and debate,” has published a commentary that primarily takes a negative view of the use of nanotech (or any tech) for life extension: Extreme life extension raises other interesting, yet troubling questions. Significant life extension could have serious implications for individual identity; what if we change [...]
Posted in Bionanotechnology, Ethics, Future Medicine, Healing/preserving environment, Health & longevity, Life extension, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 19 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 4th, 2010
Here we present a special report from Dave Conz of ASU on Josh Hall’s talk and subsequent panel discussion at the SME nanotech conference. An excerpt: Technoscientific development is difficult to direct and nearly impossible to predict. Because of this – not in spite of it – panel discussions like “How Do We Get There [...]
Posted in Feynman Path, Meetings & Conferences, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Roadmaps | 3 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on April 26th, 2010
Brian Wang brings to our attention a Daily Mail article: A routine traffic-stop in Switzerland has allegedly thwarted eco-terrorists from blowing up the site of the £55million nano-technology HQ of IBM in Europe… The group describes itself as anarchist and is opposed to all forms of micro-technology as well as nuclear power and weapons… The [...]
Posted in Ethics, Future Warfare, International organizations, Nanotechnology Politics, Open source sensing, Opinion, Security | 7 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 11th, 2010
Wondering how U.S. federal nanotech tax dollars are spent? Obama’s first President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) review will be webcast live tomorrow, March 12. This review only occurs every two years so this is your big chance to see what the current administration thinks of the NNI. Thirty minutes are set [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation | No Comments »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on January 12th, 2010
A round-up of commentary about the state of nanotech research, given the 50th anniversary of Feynman’s talk: Adam Keiper in the WSJ If this dispute over nano-nomenclature only involved some sniping scientists and a few historians watching over a tiny corner of Feynman’s legacy, it would be of little consequence. But hundreds of companies and [...]
Posted in Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 4th, 2010
Foresight ally Jeff Ubois has a new book out, published by Fondazione Giannino Bassetti, Conversations on Innovation, Power, and Responsibility. Yours truly is quoted. An excerpt: Peterson suggests that a closer look at the software developers might provide some clues about responsible cultures of innovation. “If you really want to know how to create a sense of responsibility, [...]
Posted in Ethics, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Questions for Nanodot Users, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on December 15th, 2009
One of the reasons I inveigh so heavily against the use of the word “nanotechnology” to mean merely stuff that’s measured in nanometers, is that while it focuses on the size — “nano” — it tends to ignore the function — the “technology.” Nanotech to me is about high-energy-density, high-frequency, eutactic machinery. To those focused [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | 1 Comment »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on December 5th, 2009
At Bryan Caplan’s blog this morning there was an odd comment that stirred up a 40-year old memory: A single sentence in the Durants’ The Age of Napoleon makes me wonder whether I can trust a word they write on economic policy: The memory is that it was reading another part of the Durant’s Story [...]
Posted in Complexity, Memetics, Nanotechnology Politics | 92 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on November 19th, 2009
In Popular Mechanics, longtime Foresight friend Prof. Glenn Reynolds looks at the future of nanotech and artificial intelligence, among other things looking at safety issues, including one call that potentially dangerous technologies be relinquished. He takes a counterintuitive stance, which we’ve discussed here at Foresight over the years: But I wonder if that’s such a [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Artificial Molecular Machines, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Machine Intelligence, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Robotics, Science Fiction | 3 Comments »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on June 22nd, 2009
An article this past weekend on Nanowerk reports on a study about attitudes toward regulation of nanotechnology among nanoscientists and the general public: As reported in the online version of the Journal of Nanoparticle Research today (June 19), Scheufele and Corley found that the public tends to focus on the benefits — rather than potential [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 26th, 2009
From The Gulf Times via Nanowerk: The proposal for establishing an Arab Council on Nanotechnology (ACON) was presented by Al-Quds University’s Mukhles Sowwan while discussing about ‘Nanotechnology and molecular manufacturing: Towards balanced plans for responsible worldwide use.’ “The mission of ACON should be to raise awareness of the benefits and dangers of molecular nanotechnology, and [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | 5 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on March 9th, 2009
“It is time we do what’s necessary to make NANO the next national priority.”–U.S. Rep. Michael Honda, D-San Jose
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Opinion | 2 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on January 21st, 2009
The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, via AAAS EurekAlert, brings us an update on federal efforts to address the potential environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks posed by engineered nanomaterials. “New House bill addresses need for more risk research, oversight“: The House Science and Technology Committee [on January 15] introduced legislation that highlights the growing attention [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Reports & publications | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 16th, 2009
From the February 2009 issue of the “science is culture” publication Seed magazine, not yet online: Hypothesis: Civil Nanotechnology Starting in 2009, nanotech-based sensing will enable a level of environmental monitoring that could help reduce pollution tremendously. Such devices could be of immense benefit to the environment, but unfortunately, without careful attention they will trigger [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Media Mentions, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Open source sensing, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 9th, 2008
Josh Hall, author of Nanofuture: What’s Next for Nanotechnology, sends this message to Nanodot readers: Dear Foresight members & friends, It’s the time of year when many of you are renewing your Foresight memberships, and helping us meet our $30,000 goal for our Challenge Grant by December 31: http://www.foresight.org/challenge I believe that the next decade [...]
Posted in About Foresight, Foresight News, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 2 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on December 3rd, 2008
A nanostructure called a “gyroid” provides the basis for a more efficient, inexpensive nanotech solar cell.
Posted in Energy, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology Politics | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on October 7th, 2008
A recently released poll shows that the American public is largely uniformed about both nanotechnology and synthetic biology, and furthermore that the level of public awareness about nanotechnology has not changed since 2004.
Posted in Memetics, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation, Reports & publications | 9 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on August 28th, 2008
Government-sponsored discussions of the implications for society of advanced nanotechnology and other emerging technologies have taken place and are ongoing in both the US and Europe. A recent Nanowerk Spotlight written by Michael Berger gives an update of deliberations in Europe and compares and contrasts the US and European approaches. From “Europe and the U.S. [...]
Posted in Government programs, International organizations, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Jim Lewis on August 19th, 2008
The Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University is one of two centers funded by the National Science Foundation to study nanotechnology in society. One of their tools for studying the impact of nanotech upon society is the National Citizens’ Technology Forum (NCTF). They have recently published the results of their National Citizens’ [...]
Posted in Ethics, Future Medicine, Government programs, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation, Reports & publications | 3 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 8th, 2008
From The Economist, a look at Russia’s technology, including nanotech: After years of high oil prices, money is again no object: in 2007 Russia put 130 billion roubles ($5.5 billion) into a state corporation for nanotechnologies that is being likened to the Manhattan Project… But the big problem for high technology in Russia is neither [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, New Institutions | 5 Comments »
|
|