Archive for the 'Government programs' Category
Posted by Stephanie C on March 29th, 2013
In anticipation of Eric Drexler’s new book, Forbes contributor Bruce Dorminey interviews him about the meaning of nanotechnology and its revolutionary prospects. Selected excerpt: … In what fields would APM cause the most pronounced economic disruption and the collapse of global supply chains to more local chains? The digital revolution had far-reaching effects on information [...]
Posted in Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM), Bionanotechnology, Computational nanotechnology, Economics, Energy, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Productive Nanosystems | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on March 1st, 2013
A proposed large project to produce a dynamic map of the functional connectome of the human brain will require a convergence of neuroscience, biotechnology, nanotechnology, and computation, and may therefore spur the development of advanced nanotechnology leading to molecular manufacturing.
Posted in Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM), Bionanotechnology, Found On Web, Government programs, Machine Intelligence, Media Mentions, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Productive Nanosystems | No Comments »
Posted by Stephanie C on February 28th, 2013
The advent of new technologies is typically followed by new government regulation, and in the absence of data, fear-based reactionism can have far too much influence on policy. Quality research studies on real risks and impacts of nanoscale technologies can help lead to legitimate scientific consensus and appropriate regulation. Engineered nanoparticles draw particular attention, because [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotechnology Politics, Research | 2 Comments »
Posted by Stephanie C on October 29th, 2012
Too much reliance on opportunity-based research could significantly hinder scientific advancement. We have the ability now to explore the specifics of potential future technologies, and the knowledge gained could, in turn, add useful and possibly surprising priorities for research today.
Posted in Government programs, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanotech, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 3 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on July 23rd, 2012
A European Commission-funded video and education portal introduces nanotechnology to students and others.
Posted in Found On Web, Government programs, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanotech, Nanotechnology | 1 Comment »
Posted by Jim Lewis on May 26th, 2012
Darpa has launched a “Living Foundries” program to bring an engineering perspective to synthetic biology to greatly accelerate progress through standardization and modularization.
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM), Bionanotechnology, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Electronics, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanobusiness, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Productive Nanosystems | 3 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on January 28th, 2012
A National Academy of Sciences panel has recommended a four-part research effort focused on preventing and managing any potential health and environmental risks of nanomaterials.
Posted in Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Health & longevity, Media Mentions, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Jim Lewis on November 30th, 2011
To counter the threat of evolved or engineered resistance of pathogenic bacteria to antibiotics, Darpa proposes to use nanotechnology to develop “Rapidly Adaptable Nanotherapeutics”.
Posted in Bionanotechnology, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanobusiness, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology | 6 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on October 7th, 2011
In light of our continuing interest in the ways in which nanotechnology will interact with robotics and other emerging technologies, here is an update from IEEE Spectrum on the Boston Dynamics robot project. The earlier version called BigDog was cited here a few years ago, and was impressive enough. The update is a substantially improved [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, Robotics, Transportation | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on August 23rd, 2011
A green nanotechnology roadmap released by the American Chemical Society describes the opportunities and barriers to developing commercial applications of nanomaterials that present little threat of harm to health and the environment, and concludes with an action agenda to more forward.
Posted in Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Productive Nanosystems, Reports & publications, Roadmaps | 1 Comment »
Posted by Jim Lewis on December 28th, 2010
Nanoparticles that deliver two anticancer agents simultaneously kill cancer cells more effectively than nanoparticles delivering the agents separately.
Posted in Bionanotechnology, Future Medicine, Government programs, Health & longevity, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Research | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on December 24th, 2010
Senior Associate Alvin Steinberg suggests that we portray the nanotech race as in part a security race involving quantum computing.
Posted in About Foresight, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Questions for Nanodot Users, Security | 10 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on December 10th, 2010
DARPA is basing an approach to AI on devices called memristors that use a nanoscale property to mimic neurons.
Posted in Government programs, Machine Intelligence, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology | 2 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on December 6th, 2010
Research and Science Education Subcommittee Chairman Dan Lipinski (IL-03) expressed his strong support for the National Nanotechnology Initiative’s draft Strategic Plan, in particular its focus on ensuring that America’s substantial investment in nanotech research and development is turned into new companies, products, and jobs.
Posted in Economics, Energy, Government programs, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanojobs, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Press Releases | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on November 5th, 2010
US National Nanotechnology Initiative wants your comments on its strategic plan.
Posted in Economics, Energy, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanobusiness, Nanojobs, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation, Reports & publications | 5 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on October 21st, 2010
New X-ray laser to make stop-motion movies of atomic processes
Posted in Government programs, International organizations, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 16th, 2010
Longtime Foresight supporter John Gilmore writes: “I noticed a story that reminded me of something Foresight wanted to encourage in society. Wired reports that the CIA uses decision analysis software ‘Analysis of Competing Hypotheses’, and has funded a rewritten version for shared networked analysis by many people. But the gov’t contractors got into a hassle [...]
Posted in Government programs, Intellectual Property, Memetics, New Institutions, Open Source, Opinion, Public participation, Science court | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 6th, 2010
Nanotechnology Now brings news of a recent Atom Technology workshop in Singapore featuring dual Foresight Institute Feynman Prize winner Christian Joachim, Feynman Prize founder Jim Von Ehr of Zyvex Labs and Zyvex Asia, and Foresight Roadmap participant Damian Allis of Syracuse University: Atom Technology is IMRE’s flagship program led by well known scientist Prof. Christian [...]
Posted in Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM), Government programs, Meetings & Conferences, Molecular Electronics, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Research | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 1st, 2010
The U.S. President’s Council on Advisors on Science and Technology requested public input on a number of manufacturing topics including “molecular-level, atomically precise production.” Foresight joined with our sister organization IMM to produce a statement on Atomically Precise Manufacturing, now posted on the OpenPCAST site, with public voting and commenting still continuing, so join in the [...]
Posted in About Foresight, Energy, Foresight News, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Health & longevity, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Public participation, Questions for Nanodot Users, Reports & publications | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 11th, 2010
Wondering how U.S. federal nanotech tax dollars are spent? Obama’s first President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) review will be webcast live tomorrow, March 12. This review only occurs every two years so this is your big chance to see what the current administration thinks of the NNI. Thirty minutes are set [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation | No Comments »
|
|