Archive for the 'Government programs' Category
Posted by Jim Lewis on August 19th, 2008
The Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University is one of two centers funded by the National Science Foundation to study nanotechnology in society. One of their tools for studying the impact of nanotech upon society is the National Citizens’ Technology Forum (NCTF). They have recently published the results of their National Citizens’ [...]
Posted in Ethics, Future Medicine, Government programs, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation, Reports & publications | 3 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on August 12th, 2008
H.R. 6661 establishes a prize competition for five key areas of nanotech.
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 8th, 2008
From The Economist, a look at Russia’s technology, including nanotech: After years of high oil prices, money is again no object: in 2007 Russia put 130 billion roubles ($5.5 billion) into a state corporation for nanotechnologies that is being likened to the Manhattan Project… But the big problem for high technology in Russia is neither [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, New Institutions | 5 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 9th, 2008
A while back Senior Associate Stuart Scott let us know that he had been selected to participate in a National Citizen’s Technology Forum process on nanotechnology, sponsored by Arizona State and University of North Carolina, among other schools. Presumably this is funded by the social science budget of the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative, via NSF. [...]
Posted in Ethics, Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 18th, 2008
Normally this blog focuses on nanotechnology, but it’s also important to stay on top of major advances in related fields such as robotics; the fields will interact in interesting ways. This video of a DARPA-funded project from Boston Dynamics is a must-see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww Watch the whole thing, and use the YouTube version; the one on [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, Machine Intelligence, Robotics | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 13th, 2008
Here at Foresight we try to present a balanced view of nanotechnology, discussing prospective benefits while also acknowledging potential problems. It would be good if the “first major television series to look at the implications of advances in nanotechnology” did the same. But see the description of the upcoming public television series: Nanotechnology: The Power [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation | 7 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 7th, 2008
We’ve been critical in the past of Saudi Arabia’s policy of having women researchers in nanotechnology (and of course other fields as well) work separately from male researchers. Now King Abdullah has moved personally to fund, at the US$10 billion level, a new graduate-level university with a new policy toward women, to be advised by [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanotech, Nanotechnology Politics, New Institutions, Opinion | 1 Comment »
Posted by Jim Lewis on February 18th, 2008
After several months of public consultation, the European Commission has announced a Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research.
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, International organizations, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Public participation | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 23rd, 2008
Korea.net informs us of challenging nanotechnology goals for that country: An ambitious government plan seeks to make Korea one of the top three countries for nanotechnology by 2020… “By securing more than 50 of the finest international nanotechnologies by 2020, Korea will create a new industry to emerge as a top three nanotechnology power and [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Roadmaps | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 18th, 2008
For many years, Foresight has been pointing out that nanotechnology will be used for surveillance. Now Kevin Mitnick makes a long-term prediction on nanosurveillance. An excerpt: Warrantless Surveillance: The Worst is Yet to Come …Far from censuring the president, most of Congress seems completely unconcerned by the issue of warrantless surveillance. And telecom companies are [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation, Robotics, Security | 5 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 16th, 2008
Regular Nanodot readers know that we at Foresight focus more on longer-term nanotechnology, especially atomically-precise manufacturing. Yet, we joined with other nonprofits and industry to call for a better plan to address near-term nanomaterial environmental, health, and safety issues. From today’s joint press release by Environmental Defense and Dupont: (Washington, DC – January 16, 2008) [...]
Posted in Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation, Roadmaps | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 7th, 2008
On January 2 a press release was issued announcing an updated Strategic Plan (PDF) for the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative. For those of us interested in molecular nanosystems and atomically-precise manufacturing, it’s disappointing. I haven’t read the whole thing, but this is the closest wording I could find on a quick skim: A key challenge [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Reports & publications | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 19th, 2007
Nanotechnology is booming in Israel, as we learn from Azonano: Israeli Nanotechnology developed greatly since 2005. In addition to receiving an immense sum of funding (the donation matching model has effectively raised $230 million), and being the number one leader of innovations, Israel was recognized by ISI (the Institute for Science Information) as one of [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanotech, Nanotechnology | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 3rd, 2007
Everyone is pursuing private donors for their nanotechnology research, and Israel is very serious about it, matching private nanotech fund donations made from outside the country, as reported in EE Times: The country’s nanotechnology program, called the Israel National Nanotechnology Initiative (INNI) provides 3-to-1 matching funds for all private donations to nanotech centers, effectively producing [...]
Posted in Economics, Government programs, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Public participation | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on November 13th, 2007
Alexander Zaitchik writes at Wired.com a piece titled Russia Pours Billions in Oil Profits Into Nanotech Race. I’m quoted: “There’s a lot of technical talent in Russia, but not all of the funds allocated to nanotech will be deployed effectively,” said Christine Peterson, a vice president at the Foresight Nanotech Institute, in an e-mail interview. [...]
Posted in Government programs, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, New Institutions, Opinion | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on October 24th, 2007
Perhaps our headline is a bit overstated…or perhaps not. Jim Lewis brings to our attention an article in Chemistry World on the Royal Society of Chemistry website announcing that, as anticipated, the UK has officially funded a set of projects aimed at developing a nanofactory able to build with atomic precision: UK scientists have been [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Bionanotechnology, Computational nanotechnology, Foresight Kudos, Government programs, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Productive Nanosystems | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on October 17th, 2007
There’s an arms race between government patent offices and patent filers assisted by private law firms. The folks who work for the former get paid a lot less than the those who work for the latter. This leads to a continual drain away from government review of patent applications toward private generation of patent applications. [...]
Posted in Economics, Government programs, Intellectual Property, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 3 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 20th, 2007
The company Nanoscience Instruments in its Scanline newsletter (PDF, Vol. 2, Issue. 2) lets us know that one of their nanotechnology products, the Nanosurf atomic force microscope, is on its way to Mars. Excerpts: Onboard the Phoenix lander is a suite of sophisticated scientific instrumentation including a weather station, an optical microscope, and a high-resolution [...]
Posted in Biosphere, Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Space | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 19th, 2007
Alan Shalleck of NanoClarity writes over at Nanotechnology Now on how the U.S. should go about planning its future federal funding of nanotech. Excerpts: It is time to explore what the next three to five year national nanotechnology funding allocation will look like. We have already benefited from two multiple-year, multibillion-dollar Presidentially-endorsed Federal programs and [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation, Roadmaps | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 21st, 2007
Nanoforum.org, a nanotechnology gateway site in Europe, has published results from a workshop “Nanotechnologies for Environmental Remediation” (free reg req’d): The issues of environmental remediation are quite substantial and poorly addressed by conventional technologies. They include access to clean drinking water, removal of airborne pollutants, and the clean-up of industrially contaminated sites (in particular ex-military [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
|
|