Archive for the 'Government programs' Category
Posted by Christine Peterson on August 8th, 2007
US Rep. Mike Honda (D-San Jose), who has played a key role in previous US nanotechnology legislation and won the 2005 Foresight Institute Government Prize, has introduced a wide-ranging new nanotech bill, described by Nanowerk. In addition to addressing risks: The NANO ACT includes a number of provisions to create partnerships, raise awareness, and implement [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 27th, 2007
Here in the U.S. we set up nanotechnology corporations all the time. There’s some paperwork involved, and some legal fees. The founders, angel investors, and VCs might sit on the board. In Russia, they still do things differently: Putin Inked Bill on Nanotechnology Corp Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has inked the Bill on Russia’s Nanotechnology [...]
Posted in Government programs, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, New Institutions | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 19th, 2007
In the process of preparing a nanotechnology Code of Conduct, the European Commission is requesting public input on a consultation paper. It sounds as though everyone is welcome to contribute. Being from Europe, the paper cites the precautionary principle, but goes further by listing some areas which may be too risky or unethical or rights-violating [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, International organizations, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 11th, 2007
The U.S. National Academy of Engineering wants input on what should be the Grand Challenges in engineering over the next century. Let’s let them know: nanotechnology! Specifically, nanotech leading toward, and achieving, productive nanosystems. Heck, they can just follow the Technology Roadmap for Productive Nanosystems. The IEEE has a summary. You have until August 17, [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Government programs, Memetics, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Public participation, Roadmaps | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 5th, 2007
We’ve mentioned Russian activity in nanotechnology here before, but I hadn’t quite realized the scale of Russian nanotech plans until this article in RIA Novosti: First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov, who is in charge of high-technology development, said in June the government would allocate 200 billion rubles ($7.7 billion) to develop nanotechnology until 2015. [...]
Posted in Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 27th, 2007
At one of the Accelerating Change conferences I saw Prof. Beth Noveck introduce for the first time her ideas on improving patents via peer review. Now, the nanotechnology field will be envious to hear that another field has been chosen to carry out the first pilot project — software, as reported in IEEE Spectrum: The [...]
Posted in Ethics, Government programs, Intellectual Property, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 21st, 2007
Just received from Steffen Foss Hansen is a paper by his colleague Evan Michelson at the Wilson Center on the tough issue of “Nanotechnology Policy: An Analysis of Transnational Governance Issues Facing the United States and China.” An excerpt: Due to the rapid pace of R&D, discoveries in nanotechnology could come in great, discontinuous leaps [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, International organizations, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Reports & publications | 5 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 24th, 2007
Keith Powers brings to our attention a claim that the German government has started collecting the chemical profiles of individuals, to be used for political purposes. From The Register in the UK: German police are compiling a Stasi-style “scent bank” database of potentially violent crusty protesters against global capitalism, according to reports. An article in [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Government programs, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Openness/Privacy, Security | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 23rd, 2007
Since it was the potential environmental benefits of nanotechnology that first drew me (and many others) to an interest in the field, it’s good to see some official notice of that aspect. From Cordis via Nanowerk News: Much has been said about the potential of nanotechnologies to revolutionise the way we live, with the biggest [...]
Posted in Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, Nano, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on April 19th, 2007
BusinessWeek.com reports that nanotechnology is the next big thing in Russia: Russia will pour over $1 billion into equipment for nanotechnology research over the next three years as it uses massive oil and gas export earnings to diversify an economy now heavily dependent on raw materials, First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said Wednesday. “(Nanotechnology) [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 7 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 12th, 2007
Now, kids around the world can benefit from the nanoeducational prowess of Singapore. (Or at least rich kids can.) The ever-vigilant website Nanowerk brings word of three Nano-Bio educational kits available for ordering from Singapore. They’re perhaps a bit more bio- than nano-oriented, but whatever gets kids doing science and technology is helpful: One of [...]
Posted in Bionanotechnology, Government programs, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanobiotechnology, Nanotechnology, Public participation | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 9th, 2007
A while back I offered to write more about Health and Nanotechnology: Economic, Societal, and Institutional Impact, a report from a conference convened with the cooperation of the U.S. Dept. of State and the European Commission, part of a series called Perspectives on the Future of Science and Technology, which has a ten-year time horizon. [...]
Posted in Government programs, International organizations, Meetings & Conferences, Nano, Nanotechnology, Opinion, Reports & publications | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on February 7th, 2007
In case you missed the China webcast by the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, here’s a short summary from IT Week by Clement James: China bets big on nanotech Country takes aim at $3 trillion global market in nanotech products Nanotechnology is key to the future economic success [...]
Posted in Economics, Government programs, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on February 1st, 2007
Long-time nanotechnology trackers have assumed that nanotech will be useful for chemical and biological defense, and sure enough, at least one national government is exploring this issue. See the website for the Nanotechnology Initiative at the Special Projects Office at the Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense, which falls under the [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 26th, 2007
Speigel Online reports that nanotechnology work at the University of Texas is leading toward a nanotech “exoskeleton” for military use: Now the superpower’s military is hoping to profit from the findings of nanotechnologist Ray Baughman from the University of Texas. He has managed to develop chemically grown nanotubes, which are like tiny muscles. The microscopically [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, Research | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 23rd, 2007
Nanotechnology in China: Ambitions and Realities (pdf) will be the topic of a live webcast on Tuesday, February 6, 2007 at 3 PM EST, sponsored by the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies at the Woodrow Wilson Center: A senior Department of Commerce official recently claimed that China is rapidly catching up to the United States in [...]
Posted in Government programs, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 17th, 2007
In addition to the experimental project described here yesterday, there are now two more posted on the U.K. Software Control of Matter Ideas Factory blog which are very likely to be funded — the first experimental, the second theoretical: Directed Reconfigurable Nanomachines We propose a scheme to revolutionise the synthesis of nanodevices, nanomachines, and, ultimately, [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Computational nanotechnology, Foresight Kudos, Government programs, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Research | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 16th, 2007
Earlier we expressed enthusiasm for the UK Software Control of Matter project, and sure enough, they have already made progress toward setting themselves an ambitious, visionary goal which is expected to be funded: We propose to create a molecular machine that will build new materials under software control. The output of the machine will be [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Bionanotechnology, Government programs, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanobiotechnology, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Questions for Nanodot Users | 11 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 15th, 2007
On the plane back from last week’s U.S. National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office-sponsored workshop on ethics and nanotechnology, I dug into the report “Health and Nanotechnology: Economic, Societal, and Institutional Impact” (not on web, as far as I can tell). This was the result of a meeting sponsored by the U.S. Department of State and the [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, NanoEducation, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation, Reports & publications | 10 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 11th, 2007
The U.S. National Academy of Engineering is requesting your input on Grand Challenges for Engineering over the next 100 years. This being Nanodot, we hope you’ll nominate nanotechnology. It’s a serious effort funded by $500,000 from NSF. From the MSNBC coverage: The comments will be winnowed down, then reviewed by an 18-member blue-ribbon committee headed [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Government programs, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Public participation, Questions for Nanodot Users, Reports & publications, Roadmaps | 1 Comment »
|
|