Archive for the 'Nanosurveillance' Category
Posted by Jim Lewis on January 23rd, 2012
Human life after advanced nanotechnology has been developed will be fundamentally different from life up until that point.
Posted in About Foresight, Abuse of Advanced Technology, Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Foresight News, Future Medicine, Healing/preserving environment, Health & longevity, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, Nanomedicine, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Open source sensing, Openness/Privacy, Opinion | No Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on August 10th, 2011
Proposed projects to use smartphone networks to gather data and inform authorities are opening discussion of how such data should be used.
Posted in About Foresight, Abuse of Advanced Technology, Media Mentions, Memetics, Nanosurveillance, Open Source, Open source sensing, Openness/Privacy, Security | 3 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on April 5th, 2011
Zyvex Technologies announced that its 54-foot boat named Piranha completed a rough-weather sea test near Puget Sound in the Pacific Ocean, demonstrating record fuel efficiency.
Posted in Energy, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanobusiness, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Transportation | 8 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on December 24th, 2010
Senior Associate Alvin Steinberg suggests that we portray the nanotech race as in part a security race involving quantum computing.
Posted in About Foresight, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Questions for Nanodot Users, Security | 10 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on October 15th, 2010
An energy cell containing a lead zirconate titanate cantilever coated with a carbon nanotube film uses nanotechnology to produce electricity from scavenged light and thermal energy.
Posted in Energy, MEMS, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Open source sensing, Openness/Privacy, Research, Security | No Comments »
Posted by J. Storrs Hall on June 8th, 2009
Preserving Security and Civil Liberties in the Sensor Age Palo Alto, CA — June 8, 2009 — A new open source-style project to promote Open Source Sensing has been started, with the goal of bringing the benefits of a bottom-up, decentralized approach to sensing for security and environmental purposes. “The intent of the project is [...]
Posted in Foresight News, Nanosurveillance | 2 Comments »
Posted by Jim Lewis on January 23rd, 2009
In light of the call for open-source sensing arising from nanotech-based environmental monitoring, it is interesting to note this recent progress in building a nanotech-powered biosensor powered by molecular motors.
Posted in Bionanotechnology, Nano, Nanobiotechnology, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Open source sensing | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 16th, 2009
From the February 2009 issue of the “science is culture” publication Seed magazine, not yet online: Hypothesis: Civil Nanotechnology Starting in 2009, nanotech-based sensing will enable a level of environmental monitoring that could help reduce pollution tremendously. Such devices could be of immense benefit to the environment, but unfortunately, without careful attention they will trigger [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Biosphere, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Government programs, Healing/preserving environment, Media Mentions, Nano, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Open source sensing, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 8th, 2008
We’ve received an invitation to participate in the Center for Nanotechnology in Society’s project to build and critique nanotechnology scenarios. Current topics to edit in the wiki, or you can add your own: * Barless Prisons * Bionic Eyes * Living with a Brain Chip * Disease Detector * Automated Sewer Surveillance * Engineered Tissues
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Future Medicine, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Public participation | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 18th, 2008
For many years, Foresight has been pointing out that nanotechnology will be used for surveillance. Now Kevin Mitnick makes a long-term prediction on nanosurveillance. An excerpt: Warrantless Surveillance: The Worst is Yet to Come …Far from censuring the president, most of Congress seems completely unconcerned by the issue of warrantless surveillance. And telecom companies are [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation, Robotics, Security | 5 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 13th, 2007
Nanowerk brings our attention to a story at Forbes.com looking at anticipated developments in sensing and monitoring: At their annual meeting this fall in Montreal, there was little of the traditional talk among the international privacy people about the nuts and bolts of data protection. Instead, there were urgent and distressed discussions about “uberveillance,” “ambient [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on October 19th, 2007
Registration for Foresight’s Nov. 3-4 Vision Weekend focused on nanotechnology and other advanced technologies — traditionally restricted to Foresight Senior Associates — is being opened to the general public this year as an experiment. Space is limited and participants are advised to register very soon. To warm up for our Sat/Sun afternoon unconference, in the [...]
Posted in About Foresight, Artificial Molecular Machines, Bionanotechnology, Biosphere, Computational nanotechnology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Foresight News, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Intellectual Property, Investment/Entrepreneuring, Life extension, Machine Intelligence, Meetings & Conferences, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nano, NanoEducation, Nanobiotechnology, Nanobusiness, Nanojobs, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Productive Nanosystems, Public participation, Roadmaps, Security, Senior Associates | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 25th, 2007
Like me, perhaps you normally prefer more traditional art: oil paintings, perhaps. But new art can have an important societal purpose beyond its aesthetic value, and artist Nina Waisman has taken on a key nanotech issue to raise in her work: the relation between nanotechnology, sensing, and privacy. From SignOnSanDiego: If airport security were run [...]
Posted in Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation, Reviews | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 21st, 2007
The Heritage Foundation portrays itself as a conservative think tank, and by gosh, they are! Specifically, they are conservative on the longer term prospects for nanotechnology: In the more distant future, combining nanocomputers, sensors, and nanomechanical architectures into one system would make possible autonomously targeted and guided projectiles, such as bullets and rockets. Nanotechnology could [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 10th, 2007
Here at Foresight we like to present a balanced picture of nanotechnology, pushing for the benefits and heading off downsides. To do this, it’s necessary to discuss those nanotech downsides especially when someone asks about them. Earth & Sky asked me, and put the audio on the web: Upcoming, said Peterson, are issues of privacy [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Foresight News, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Openness/Privacy, Opinion | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 21st, 2007
Just received from Steffen Foss Hansen is a paper by his colleague Evan Michelson at the Wilson Center on the tough issue of “Nanotechnology Policy: An Analysis of Transnational Governance Issues Facing the United States and China.” An excerpt: Due to the rapid pace of R&D, discoveries in nanotechnology could come in great, discontinuous leaps [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, International organizations, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Reports & publications | 5 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 24th, 2007
Keith Powers brings to our attention a claim that the German government has started collecting the chemical profiles of individuals, to be used for political purposes. From The Register in the UK: German police are compiling a Stasi-style “scent bank” database of potentially violent crusty protesters against global capitalism, according to reports. An article in [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Ethics, Government programs, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Openness/Privacy, Security | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on May 18th, 2007
I tell audiences that the day is coming when nanotechnology will be able to tell what they ate or smoked. That day is coming closer, according to Nanowerk News: To this day, fingerprints are just the thing when a perpetrator needs to be arrested or a person needs to be identified. British scientists working with [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Future Medicine, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on April 5th, 2007
In the long term, we’ll need effective security techniques for advanced nanotechnology-based systems. This will take a while to figure out, so come help us do it at an upcoming open source conference, Penguicon: Open Source-style Security for the Whole Physical World Christine Peterson, Bruce Schneier One of the biggest problems society faces this century [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Environment, Health, and Safety, Foresight News, Future Warfare, Meetings & Conferences, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Public participation, Security | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 6th, 2007
Nanowerk covers a February 2007 report from the U.S. Defense Science Board titled 21st Century Strategic Technology Vectors (pdf). Excerpts: DOD must also keep abreast of the most rapidly changing and emerging technologies as a necessary complement to the mission-driven perspective that is the focus of this report. Today these include bio-, info-, and nano-technologies. [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Reports & publications | 2 Comments »
|
|