Archive for the 'Military nanotechnology' Category
Posted by Christine Peterson on September 21st, 2007
The Heritage Foundation portrays itself as a conservative think tank, and by gosh, they are! Specifically, they are conservative on the longer term prospects for nanotechnology: In the more distant future, combining nanocomputers, sensors, and nanomechanical architectures into one system would make possible autonomously targeted and guided projectiles, such as bullets and rockets. Nanotechnology could [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on July 10th, 2007
Here at Foresight we like to present a balanced picture of nanotechnology, pushing for the benefits and heading off downsides. To do this, it’s necessary to discuss those nanotech downsides especially when someone asks about them. Earth & Sky asked me, and put the audio on the web: Upcoming, said Peterson, are issues of privacy [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Ethics, Foresight News, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Openness/Privacy, Opinion | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on June 21st, 2007
Just received from Steffen Foss Hansen is a paper by his colleague Evan Michelson at the Wilson Center on the tough issue of “Nanotechnology Policy: An Analysis of Transnational Governance Issues Facing the United States and China.” An excerpt: Due to the rapid pace of R&D, discoveries in nanotechnology could come in great, discontinuous leaps [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Environment, Health, and Safety, Government programs, International organizations, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotech, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Reports & publications | 5 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on April 19th, 2007
BusinessWeek.com reports that nanotechnology is the next big thing in Russia: Russia will pour over $1 billion into equipment for nanotechnology research over the next three years as it uses massive oil and gas export earnings to diversify an economy now heavily dependent on raw materials, First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said Wednesday. “(Nanotechnology) [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 7 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on April 5th, 2007
In the long term, we’ll need effective security techniques for advanced nanotechnology-based systems. This will take a while to figure out, so come help us do it at an upcoming open source conference, Penguicon: Open Source-style Security for the Whole Physical World Christine Peterson, Bruce Schneier One of the biggest problems society faces this century [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Environment, Health, and Safety, Foresight News, Future Warfare, Meetings & Conferences, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Open Source, Openness/Privacy, Public participation, Security | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 19th, 2007
USA Today covers the challenging but environmentally important issue of making batteries: inefficient, nasty things today that need to get a lot better and cheaper. And they will, with nanotech developed by these two MIT professors: [Prof. Angela] Belcher’s virus-assembled batteries are thin, transparent sheets that look like plastic wrap. They could be used to [...]
Posted in Environment, Health, and Safety, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotechnology | 4 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on March 6th, 2007
Nanowerk covers a February 2007 report from the U.S. Defense Science Board titled 21st Century Strategic Technology Vectors (pdf). Excerpts: DOD must also keep abreast of the most rapidly changing and emerging technologies as a necessary complement to the mission-driven perspective that is the focus of this report. Today these include bio-, info-, and nano-technologies. [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Reports & publications | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on February 26th, 2007
Though we do not always agree with Gregor Wolbring, his column on nanotech and the military reminds us of a very difficult potential problem: The start of a nano arms race, and the lack of willingness to regulate potential synthetic biology through the modification of existing treaties or the application of existing treaties or the [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, International organizations, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Reports & publications | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on February 1st, 2007
Long-time nanotechnology trackers have assumed that nanotech will be useful for chemical and biological defense, and sure enough, at least one national government is exploring this issue. See the website for the Nanotechnology Initiative at the Special Projects Office at the Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense, which falls under the [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology | No Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 26th, 2007
Speigel Online reports that nanotechnology work at the University of Texas is leading toward a nanotech “exoskeleton” for military use: Now the superpower’s military is hoping to profit from the findings of nanotechnologist Ray Baughman from the University of Texas. He has managed to develop chemically grown nanotubes, which are like tiny muscles. The microscopically [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, Research | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on January 9th, 2007
Somehow we missed the original launch of the 12-minute video describing MIT’s Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, funded by the U.S. Army. It includes animated sequences depicting combat scenarios and how nanotechnologies could be used in response. Some of these are pretty science-fictiony, which means they have at least some chance of being accurate projections. The [...]
Posted in Future Warfare, Government programs, Military nanotechnology, Nano, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics, Opinion | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 29th, 2006
The Institute for the Future, in a UK-funded study published on the Stanford website, presents eleven outlooks for nanotechnology over the next 50 years: • Better drug delivery through nanotechnology • Carbon nanotubes and lighter vehicles • The coming nanoshell revolution in oncology • The dream of biochemical nanocomputing • Manufacturing with programmable materials “Advent [...]
Posted in Artificial Molecular Machines, Bionanotechnology, Future Medicine, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Molecular manufacturing, Nanobiotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Reports & publications, Reviews, Security | 1 Comment »
Posted by Christine Peterson on December 4th, 2006
A new book by German physicist Jürgen Altmann of Dortmund University looks at Military Nanotechnology: Potential Applications and Preventive Arms Control (Routledge, 2006). Both near-term and long-term applications are examined. From the abstract: NT applications will likely pervade all areas of the military…By using NT to miniaturise sensors, actuators and propulsion, autonomous systems (robots) could [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Artificial Molecular Machines, Ethics, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Molecular Nanotechnology, Nanosurveillance, Nanotechnology, Openness/Privacy, Opinion, Public participation, Reports & publications, Security, Space | 12 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on November 17th, 2006
It had to happen somewhere: the first country to publicly state they are planning to use nanotechnology in weapons is…Israel. Before now, to my knowledge, only defensive uses have been discussed in public. From the Sydney Morning Herald: Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has given the green light for Israel to set up a special office [...]
Posted in Abuse of Advanced Technology, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Politics | 10 Comments »
Posted by Christine Peterson on November 10th, 2006
We are only in the very early stages of nanotechnology bringing new abilities to DNA reading, but the latest such nanotech advance comes from New Mexico Tech profs Peng Zhang and Snezna Rogelj, described in an article by George Zamora: NM Tech Researchers Develop Nanomaterial Bio-sensor New Mexico Tech researchers have developed a highly sensitive [...]
Posted in Ethics, Future Warfare, Military nanotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nanoscale Bulk Technologies, Nanotechnology | 3 Comments »
|
|