<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the Foresight Institute &#187; Robotics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=21" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:15:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two types of artificial muscle from nanotechnology</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5467</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5467#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Molecular Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanoscale Bulk Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One research group working with rotaxanes and another group working with carbon nanotubes have provided two very different solutions to the problem of producing motion via artificial muscles at different scales from the nano to the macro.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_5468" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 360px"><a href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/image1_copie_350_px.jpg"><img src="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/image1_copie_350_px.jpg" alt="" title="image1_copie_350_px" width="350" height="122" class="size-full wp-image-5468" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The principle of contraction and extension of a telescopic polymer chain based on the supramolecular association of thousands of nano-machines. (Credit: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &#038; Co.KGaA. and CNRS)</p></div>
<p>Biology uses various types of molecular machines to produce movement, all of which are candidates to be mimicked for use in nanotechnology. Muscles produce movement through the contraction of systems of polymers, powered by the release of chemical energy. Now scientists from France&#8217;s CNRS have developed an artificial muscle that produces micrometer-scale movement through the coordinated action of thousands of individual molecular machines each producing nanometer-scale movement. A hat tip to Gene Ostrovsky at MedGadget for a <a href="http://www.medgadget.com/2012/10/molecular-nano-machines-team-up-to-mimic-real-muscles.html" target="_blank">story</a> on this CNRS press release &#8220;<a href="http://www2.cnrs.fr/en/2117.htm" target="_blank">Assembly of nano-machines mimics human muscle</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>For the first time, an assembly of thousands of nano-machines capable of producing a coordinated contraction movement extending up to around ten micrometers, like the movements of muscular fibers, has been synthesized by a CNRS team from the Institut Charles Sadron. This innovative work, headed by Nicolas Giuseppone, professor at the Université de Strasbourg, and involving researchers from the Laboratoire de Mati&egrave;re et Syst&egrave;mes Complexes (CNRS/Universit&eacute; Paris Diderot), provides an experimental validation of a biomimetic approach that has been conceptualized for some years in the field of nanosciences. This discovery opens up perspectives for a multitude of applications in robotics, in nanotechnology for the storage of information, in the medical field for the synthesis of artificial muscles or in the design of other materials incorporating nano-machines (endowed with novel mechanical properties). This work has been published in the on-line version of the journal <i>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</i> [<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.201206571/abstract" target="_blank">abstract</a>].</p>
<p><span id="more-5467"></span></p>
<p>&hellip; Even though synthetic chemists have made dazzling progress over the last few years in the manufacture of artificial nano-machines (the mechanical properties of which are of increasing interest for research and industry), the coordination of several of these machines in space and in time hitherto remained an unresolved problem.</p>
<p>Not anymore: for the first time, Giuseppone&#8217;s team has succeeded in synthesizing long polymer chains incorporating, via supramolecular bonds (1), thousands of nano-machines each capable of producing linear telescopic motion of around one nanometer. Under the influence of pH, their simultaneous movements allow the whole polymer chain to contract or extend over about 10 micrometers, thereby amplifying the movement by a factor of 10,000, along the same principles as those used by muscular tissues.</p>
<p>&hellip; These results, obtained using a biomimetic approach, could lead to numerous applications for the design of artificial muscles, micro-robots or the development of new materials incorporating nano-machines endowed with novel multi-scale mechanical properties.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><div id="attachment_5469" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 360px"><a href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/nanothread-350-2012-11jpg.jpg"><img src="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/nanothread-350-2012-11jpg.jpg" alt="" title="nanothread-350-2012-11jpg" width="350" height="137" class="size-full wp-image-5469" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">UT Dallas researchers have made artificial muscles from carbon nanotube yarns that have been infiltrated with paraffin wax and twisted until coils form along their length. (Credit: UT Dallas)</p></div>
<p>A different flavor of nanotechnology involving nanostructures that are not defined to atomic precision has produced a different type of artificial muscle that looks very robust in that it does not require changing solutions of electrolytes, responds very quickly, and is far stronger than human muscles of the same size. These muscles are composed of a yarn of carbon nanotubes filled with wax. The research was published in <i>Science</i> [<a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/338/6109/928" target="_blank">abstract</a>]. A hat tip to KurzweilAI for <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/nanotech-yarn-behaves-like-super-strong-muscle" target="_blank">reprinting</a> this news release from UT Dallas &#8220;<a href="http://www.utdallas.edu/news/2012/11/15-20871_Wax-Filled-Nanotech-Yarn-Behaves-Like-Super-Strong_article-wide.html" target="_blank">Wax-Filled Nanotech Yarn Behaves Like Super-Strong Muscle</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>New artificial muscles made from nanotech yarns and infused with paraffin wax can lift more than 100,000 times their own weight and generate 85 times more mechanical power than the same size natural muscle, according to scientists at The University of Texas at Dallas and their international team from Australia, China, South Korea, Canada and Brazil.</p>
<p>The artificial muscles are yarns constructed from carbon nanotubes, which are seamless, hollow cylinders made from the same type of graphite layers found in the core of ordinary pencils. Individual nanotubes can be 10,000 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair, yet pound-for-pound, can be 100 times stronger than steel.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The artificial muscles that we&rsquo;ve developed can provide large, ultrafast contractions to lift weights that are 200 times heavier than possible for a natural muscle of the same size,&rdquo; said Dr. Ray Baughman, team leader, Robert A. Welch Professor of Chemistry and director of the Alan G. MacDiarmid NanoTech Institute at UT Dallas. &ldquo;While we are excited about near-term applications possibilities, these artificial muscles are presently unsuitable for directly replacing muscles in the human body.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Described in a study published in the Nov. 16 issue of the journal <i>Science</i>, the new artificial muscles are made by infiltrating a volume-changing &ldquo;guest,&rdquo; such as the paraffin wax used for candles, into twisted yarn made of carbon nanotubes. Heating the wax-filled yarn, either electrically or using a flash of light, causes the wax to expand, the yarn volume to increase, and the yarn length to contract.</p>
<p>The combination of yarn volume increase with yarn length decrease results from the helical structure produced by twisting the yarn.  A child&rsquo;s finger cuff toy, which is designed to trap a person&rsquo;s fingers in both ends of a helically woven cylinder, has an analogous action. To escape, one must push the fingers together, which contracts the tube&rsquo;s length and expands its volume and diameter.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Because of their simplicity and high performance, these yarn muscles could be used for such diverse applications as robots, catheters for minimally invasive surgery, micromotors, mixers for microfluidic circuits, tunable optical systems, microvalves, positioners and even toys,&rdquo; Baughman said.</p>
<p>Muscle contraction – also called actuation – can be ultrafast, occurring in 25-thousandths of a second. Including times for both actuation and reversal of actuation, the researchers demonstrated a contractile power density of 4.2 kW/kg, which is four times the power-to-weight ratio of common internal combustion engines. &hellip;</p>
<p>&ldquo;The remarkable performance of our yarn muscle and our present ability to fabricate kilometer-length yarns suggest the feasibility of early commercialization as small actuators comprising centimeter-scale yarn length,&rdquo; Baughman said. &ldquo;The more difficult challenge is in upscaling our single-yarn actuators to large actuators in which hundreds or thousands of individual yarn muscles operate in parallel.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Additional coverage, including a video of these micro-muscles in action, is included in Science News coverage by Sarah C. P. Williams &#8220;<a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/11/wax-filled-nanotubes-flex-their-.html" target="_blank">Wax-Filled Nanotubes Flex Their Muscles</a>&#8220;. These two very different approaches to providing nanoscale motion that can scale to microscale or even macroscale robotic motion have different features that will probably suit them to different applications. It will be interesting to see if any applications are developed that will be relevant to nanoscale atomically precise manufacturing.<br />
&mdash;James Lewis, PhD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5467</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humanoid robot for military showcases advances in robotics</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4847</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4847#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A prototype humanoid robot being developed for the US military mimics a wide range of human movements while retaining its balance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the emerging technologies expected to transform society over the coming decades, robotics at all scales is interesting because it provides graphic evidence that technology is getting better at mimicking increasingly complex movement and behavior. Last month <a href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4805" target="_blank">we noted</a> the impressive progress achieved by Boston Dynamics&#8217; AlphaDog project to develop a robot &#8220;pack animal&#8221; for the US military. Apparently there has been equally impressive progress in developing a humanoid robot capable of faithfully mimicking human movements to test protective suits for use by the military, and ultimately, to replace humans in a variety of arduous and dangerous tasks. This month <i>IEEE Spectrum</i> gave us this update: &#8220;<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/stunning-video-of-boston-dynamics-petman-humanoid" target="_blank">Stunning Video of PETMAN Humanoid Robot From Boston Dynamics</a>&#8220;, by Erico Guizzo:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&hellip; The humanoid, which will certainly be compared to the Terminator Series 800 model, can perform various movements and maintain its balance much like a real person.</p>
<p>Boston Dynamics is building PETMAN, short for Protection Ensemble Test Mannequin, for the U.S. Army, which plans to use the robot to test chemical suits and other protective gear used by troops. It has to be capable of moving just like a soldier &#8212; walking, running, bending, reaching, army crawling &#8212; to test the suit&#8217;s durability in a full range of motion. &hellip;</p>
<p>I also asked Raibert if they could eventually use PETMAN or PETMAN-related technologies in other projects. In other words, are we going to see PETMAN used in applications other than the chemical suit tests?</p>
<p>&#8220;You bet,&#8221; he says. &#8220;There are all sorts of things robots like PETMAN could be used for. Any place that has been designed for human access, mobility, or manipulation skills. Places like the Fukushima reactors could be accessed by PETMAN-like robots (or AlphaDogs), without requiring any human exposure to hazardous materials. Perhaps firefighting inside of buildings or facilities designed for human access, like on board ships designed for human crews.&#8221; &hellip;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After watching the video, Guizzo&#8217;s comparison to the Terminator Series 800 model doesn&#8217;t strike me as all that far-fetched. When they announce something that reminds us of the T-1000, I&#8217;ll know that advanced nanotechnology is imminent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4847</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Singularity University takes on advanced nanotech questions</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4818</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4818#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Advanced Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Molecular Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment, Health, and Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meetings & Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NanoEducation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanobusiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions for Nanodot Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Singularity University Executive Program recently took on the challenges of advanced nanotech: Nanotechnology: How should we evaluate the environmental impact of human-made machines that are too small to see? What limits should be placed on self-replicating nanodevices? What defenses should we institute against malevolent uses of such technology? These questions were asked by Marc [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Singularity University Executive Program recently took on the challenges of advanced nanotech:</p>
<blockquote><p>Nanotechnology: How should we evaluate the environmental impact of human-made machines that are too small to see? What limits should be placed on self-replicating nanodevices? What defenses should we institute against malevolent uses of such technology?</p></blockquote>
<p>These questions were asked by Marc Goodman, a senior advisor to Interpol and founder of Future Crimes Institute, a think tank that explores the security implications of new technology.  In a r<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/tedgreenwald/2011/10/25/building-a-cutting-edge-business-dont-ignore-policy-law-and-ethics/">eport by Ted Greenwald at Forbes.com</a>, Goodman urged &#8220;aspiring captains of emerging industries like synthetic biology, robotics, and nanotech to take a proactive attitude toward their impact on the global community.&#8221;</p>
<p>Great to see this message of foresight reaching such a key audience, in addition to Ralph Merkle&#8217;s frequent briefings on nanotech at SU.  —Christine Peterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4818</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video of very impressive DARPA-funded quadruped robot</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4805</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4805#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of our continuing interest in the ways in which nanotechnology will interact with robotics and other emerging technologies, here is an update from IEEE Spectrum on the Boston Dynamics robot project. The earlier version called BigDog was cited here a few years ago, and was impressive enough. The update is a substantially improved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In light of our continuing interest in the ways in which nanotechnology will interact with robotics and other emerging technologies, here is an update from <i>IEEE Spectrum</i> on the Boston Dynamics robot project. The earlier version called BigDog was <a href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2690" target="_blank">cited here</a> a few years ago, and was impressive enough. The update is a substantially improved version called AlphaDog. &#8220;<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/military-robots/boston-dynamics-alphadog-prototype-on-video" target="_blank">Boston Dynamics&#8217; AlphaDog Quadruped Robot Prototype on Video</a>&#8220;. The article describes the improvements and states that DARPA and the US Marines will begin to test AlphaDog sometime in 2012. I found it particularly amazing to watched the failed efforts of two burly men to topple AlphaDog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4805</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deadline THIS FRIDAY for early rate on Open Science Summit</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4774</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4774#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foresight Kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment/Entrepreneuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meetings & Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open source sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Openness/Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent lineup of speakers again this year for the Open Science Summit, Oct. 22-23, and you can get in for only $100 if you register by this Friday:  http://opensciencesummit.com Hope to see you there!  —Christine Peterson, President, Foresight Institute]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent lineup of speakers again this year for the Open Science Summit, Oct. 22-23, and you can get in for only $100 if you register by this Friday:  <a href="http://opensciencesummit.com">http://opensciencesummit.com</a></p>
<p>Hope to see you there!  —Christine Peterson, President, Foresight Institute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4774</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$50 off Foresight@Google Conference for Nanodot readers</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4572</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4572#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 22:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About Foresight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foresight News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meetings & Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foresight is having our 25th anniversary conference and celebration at Google, and we want you there! Use code NANODOT for $50 off on: FORESIGHT@GOOGLE 25th Anniversary Conference Celebration &#38; Reunion Weekend Google HQ in Mountain View, CA June 25-26, 2011 http://www.foresight.org/reunion Topics are emerging tech with special emphasis on transformative nanotech. A rockstar lineup of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foresight is having our 25th anniversary conference and celebration at Google, and we want you there!</p>
<p>Use code NANODOT for $50 off on:</p>
<p>FORESIGHT@GOOGLE</p>
<p>25th Anniversary Conference Celebration &amp; Reunion Weekend</p>
<p>Google HQ in Mountain View, CA</p>
<p>June 25-26, 2011</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foresight.org/reunion">http://www.foresight.org/reunion</a></p>
<p>Topics are emerging tech with special emphasis on transformative nanotech.</p>
<p>A rockstar lineup of speakers include:</p>
<p>• BARNEY PELL, PhD &#8211; Cofounder/CTO of Moon Express making robotic lunar landers</p>
<p>• WILLIAM ANDREGG &#8211; Founder/CEO of Halcyon Molecular</p>
<p>• PAUL SAFFO, PhD - Renowned tech forecaster and strategist</p>
<p>• LUKE NOSEK - CoFounder of Paypal, Partner at the Founders Fund</p>
<p>• SIR FRASER STODDART, PhD - Knighted creator of molecular &#8220;switches&#8221;</p>
<p>• THOMAS THEIS, PhD - IBM&#8217;s Director of Physical Sciences</p>
<p>• Keynote JIM VON EHR - Founder/President of Zyvex, the world&#8217;s first successful molecular nanotech company</p>
<p>Comments on previous meetings in this series: <a href="http://www.foresight.org/SrAssoc/Comments/">http://www.foresight.org/SrAssoc/Comments/</a></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t miss this opportunity to make new alliances, re-connect with longtime friends, and possibly get pulled into a nanotech startup!  Hope to see *you* there.  —Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4572</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Willow Garage TurtleBot advances open source do-it-yourself robotics</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4503</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4503#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Machine Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Mentions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Willow Garage TurtleBot, an open source programmable robot with a 3D vision system, is available to preorder, starting at $500.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those interested in an open source/DIY approach to emerging transformative technologies may want to look at an article (with video) on Physorg.com about a new affordable programmable robot from Willow Garage &#8220;<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-willow-garage-programmable-robot-.html" target="_blank">Willow Garage introduces affordable, programmable robot &#8211; TurtleBot</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Willow Garage, the Menlo Park, California-based consortium of robotics experts, founded by Scott Hassan in 2006 to create or develop hardware and open source software for the advancement of robotics, has announced the release of TurtleBot; a small home use robot for either amusement/entertainment purposes, or for those inclined, to build open source applications to add to the functionality of the new robot.</p>
<p>The idea behind TurtleBot, is to give novice robotics enthusiasts a base upon which to build. Traditionally, those that like to tinker with robots have had to start from scratch every time they wanted to build something; the TurtleBot does away with that concept by supplying users with a base upon which they can build, as the TurtleBot comes fully functional. Out of the box it can map your house with its 3-D vision, bring you food, take 360 degree panorama pictures and follow you around etc. But it also comes with the Robot Operating System (ROS) and associated toolkit, so that if users wish to add or change functionality, they are free to do so, and because its open source, anything they create can be shared with friends or those involved in online robotics communities.</p>
<p>Another objective of the TurtleBot team was to show that such a device could be put on the market for a reasonable price; in this case $500, for a very basic unit, and $1200 for the fully loaded version. Far below what robot enthusiasts have come to expect to pay. &hellip;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For more information, see this <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/diy/willow-garages-turtlebot-proves-that-fancy-robots-can-also-be-cheap" target="_blank">IEEE Spectrum blog</a> and this <a href="http://www.willowgarage.com/turtlebot" target="_blank">Willow Garage overview</a>, where you can alsso preorder for shipment &#8220;in early summer&#8221;. Willow Garage and open source robotics has been a topic of a <a href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/index.php?s=willow" target="_blank">number of Nanodot posts</a> since 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4503</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will building humanlike robots promote friendly AI&#063;</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4495</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4495#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Machine Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions for Nanodot Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Hanson of Hanson Robotics argues that building humanlike robots will push the boundaries of several scientific and technical disciplines and prevent intelligent machines from becoming dangerous as they achieve true general intelligence.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Hanson, the founder and CTO of Hanson Robotics, a maker of humanlike robots and AI software, has a stimulating article in <cite>IEEE Spectrum</cite> that makes points that are also relevant to the larger issue of how we develop machine intelligence, in partiular how we ensure that hyper-intelligent AI remains &#8220;friendly&#8221;. From &#8220;<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/why-we-should-build-humanlike-robots" target="_blank">Why We Should Build Humanlike Robots</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&hellip;On the tree of robotic life, humanlike robots play a particularly valuable role. It makes sense. Humans are brilliant, beautiful, compassionate, loveable, and capable of love, so why shouldn&#8217;t we aspire to make robots humanlike in these ways? Don’t we want robots to have such marvelous capabilities as love, compassion, and genius?</p>
<p>Certainly robots don&#8217;t have these capacities yet, but only by striving towards such goals do we stand a chance of achieving them. In designing human-inspired robotics, we hold our machines to the highest standards we know&ndash;humanlike robots being the apex of bio-inspired engineering.</p>
<p>In the process, humanoid robots result in good science. They push the boundaries of biology, cognitive science, and engineering, generating a mountain of scientific publications in many fields related to humanoid robotics, including: computational neuroscience, A.I., speech recognition, compliant grasping and manipulation, cognitive robotics, robotic navigation, perception, and the integration of these amazing technologies within total humanoids. This integrative approach mirrors recent progress in systems biology, and in this way humanoid robotics can be considered a kind of meta-biology. They cross-pollinate among the sciences, and represent a subject of scientific inquiry themselves.&hellip;</p>
<p>Looking forward, we can find an additional moral prerogative in building robots in our image. Simply put: if we do not humanize our intelligent machines, then they may eventually be dangerous. To be safe when they “awaken” (by which I mean gain creative, free, adaptive general intelligence), then machines must attain deep understanding and compassion towards people. They must appreciate our values, be our friends, and express their feelings in ways that we can understand. Only if they have humanlike character, can there be cooperation and peace with such machines. It is not too early to prepare for this eventuality. That day when machines become truly smart, it will be too late to ask the machines to suddenly adopt our values. Now is the time to start raising robots to be kind, loving, and giving members of our human family.&hellip;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The problem of how to ensure friendly AI is important enough that it seems wise to investigate multiple paths toward that goal. Perhaps improving humanlike robots is one such path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4495</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update and summary of potential applications of medical nanorobotics</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4356</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4356#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Molecular Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bionanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanobiotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanomedicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productive Nanosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert A. Freitas Jr. has made available his chapter on nanorobotics from the book <cite>The Future of Aging</cite>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert A. Freitas Jr. (<a href="http://www.foresight.org/about/2009Feynman.html" target="_blank">2009 Foresight Institute Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology for Theory</a>) has made available on his website &#8220;<a href="http://www.nanomedicine.com/Papers/Aging.pdf" target="_blank">Comprehensive Nanorobotic Control of Human Morbidity and Aging</a>&#8221; [1.8 MB PDF], Chapter 23 in Gregory M. Fahy, Michael D. West, L. Stephen Coles, and Steven B. Harris, eds, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Future-Aging-Pathways-Human-Extension/dp/9048139988" target="_blank"><cite>The Future of Aging: Pathways to Human Life Extension</cite></a>, Springer, New York, 2010, pp. 685-805. Freitas writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&hellip;a current update and the most comprehensive summary so far of the many potential applications of advanced diamondoid medical nanorobotics to conventional and anti-aging medicine.  Here&#8217;s the abstract:</p>
<p>Nanotechnology involves the engineering of molecularly precise structures and molecular machines, and nanomedicine is the application of nanotechnology to medicine, including the development of medical nanorobotics. Theoretical designs for diamondoid nanomachinery such as bearings, gears, motors, pumps, sensors, manipulators and even molecular computers already exist. Technologies required for the molecularly precise fabrication of diamondoid mechanical components and medical nanorobots, along with feasible strategies for the mass production of these devices, are the focus of active current research. This chapter describes a comprehensive solution to human morbidity and aging which will be attained when mankind has established control over all critical molecular events in the human body through the use of medical nanorobotics. Medical nanorobots can provide targeted treatments to individual organs, tissues, cells and even intracellular components, and can intervene in biological processes at the molecular level under direct supervision of the physician. Programmable micron-scale robotic devices will make possible comprehensive cures for human disease, the reversal of physical trauma, and individual cell repair. This leads to the complete control of human aging via nanomedically engineered negligible senescence (NENS) coupled with nanorobot-mediated rejuvenation that should extend the human healthspan at least tenfold beyond its current maximum length.  The nanomedical solution is the final step in the roadmap to the control of human aging.</p>
<p>Best wishes,</p>
<p>Robert A. Freitas Jr.  <a href="http://www.rfreitas.com" target="_blank">http://www.rfreitas.com</a><br />
Author, <cite>Nanomedicine</cite>  <a href="http://www.nanomedicine.com" target="_blank">http://www.nanomedicine.com</a> and <a href="http://www.MolecularAssembler.com" target="_blank">http://www.MolecularAssembler.com</a><br />
Senior Research Fellow, <a href="http://www.imm.org" target="_blank">Institute for Molecular Manufacturing</a></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4356</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theoretical analysis of powering nanorobots with blood glucose and oxygen</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4245</link>
		<comments>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4245#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Molecular Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanomedicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hogg and Freitas provide a theoretical analysis of the power constraints when nanorobots rely entirely on ambient bloodstream oxygen and glucose and identify aspects of nanorobot design that significantly affect available power.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert A. Freitas Jr., winner of the <a href="http://www.foresight.org/about/2009Feynman.html" target="_blank">2009 Foresight Institute Feynman Prize for Theory</a> and the <a href="http://www.foresight.org/about/communicationprize2007.html" target="_blank">2007 Foresight Institute Prize in Communication</a> sends this announcement that a major theoretical study of how to power medical nanorobots is available:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Tad Hogg and I published a major paper on powering medical nanorobots earlier this year, which is now available online at:</p>
<p>Tad Hogg, Robert A. Freitas Jr.,&#8221;Chemical Power for Microscopic Robots in Capillaries,&#8221; <i>Nanomedicine: Nanotech. Biol. Med.</i> 6(April 2010):298-317. [<a href="http://www.nanomedicine.com/Papers/NanoPowerModel2010.pdf" target="_blank">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>This paper represents the first detailed theoretical study of the actual power limitations of oxygen/glucose-powered <i>in vivo</i> medical nanorobots in human tissue capillaries.  We look at nanorobots that are positioned in single or multiple circumferential rings along the interior surface of capillary blood vessels.</p>
<p>My personal web page is at  <a href="http://www.rfreitas.com" target="_blank">http://www.rfreitas.com</a>. Tad&#8217;s web page is at  <a href="http://www.imm.org/about/hogg/" target="_blank">http://www.imm.org/about/hogg/</a>.</p>
<p>ABSTRACT.  The power available to microscopic robots (nanorobots) that oxidize bloodstream glucose while aggregated in circumferential rings on capillary walls is evaluated with a numerical model using axial symmetry and time-averaged release of oxygen from passing red blood cells. Robots about 1 &micro;m in size can produce up to several tens of picowatts, in steady state, if they fully use oxygen reaching their surface from the blood plasma. Robots with pumps and tanks for onboard oxygen storage could collect oxygen to support burst power demands two to three orders of magnitude larger. We evaluate effects of oxygen depletion and local heating on surrounding tissue. These results give the power constraints when robots rely entirely on ambient available oxygen and identify aspects of the robot design significantly affecting available power. More generally, our numerical model provides an approach to evaluating robot design choices for nanomedicine treatments in and near capillaries.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4245</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>