<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanospintronics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1176</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: waynerad</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1176#comment-2638</link>
		<dc:creator>waynerad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2002 21:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1176#comment-2638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:hmm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi. I think there is a bit of misunderstanding here. You would not use quantum computing hardware to run MS Windows. Quantum computing is only useful for solving what are known in mathematics as &quot;NP Hard&quot; problems. NP Hard problems are &quot;intractable&quot; for a classical computer -- &quot;intractable&quot; means that you can&#039;t solve it without waiting millions of years. For example, you might use a quantum computer for computing Peter Shor&#039;s algorithm for factoring numbers. If you tried to do this calculation on your Windows XP desktop, it would take &quot;forever&quot;. The ability to solve these types of problems could, concievably, greatly accelerate scientific and technological progress, even the machines are used only in high-tech manufacturing or science research labs and never touch your desktop. See Matthew Hayward&#039;s website on this topic, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imsa.edu/~matth/cs299/&quot;&gt;Quantum Computing and Shor&#039;s Algorithm&lt;/a&gt;&quot; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:hmm</strong></p>
<p>Hi. I think there is a bit of misunderstanding here. You would not use quantum computing hardware to run MS Windows. Quantum computing is only useful for solving what are known in mathematics as &quot;NP Hard&quot; problems. NP Hard problems are &quot;intractable&quot; for a classical computer &#8212; &quot;intractable&quot; means that you can&#39;t solve it without waiting millions of years. For example, you might use a quantum computer for computing Peter Shor&#39;s algorithm for factoring numbers. If you tried to do this calculation on your Windows XP desktop, it would take &quot;forever&quot;. The ability to solve these types of problems could, concievably, greatly accelerate scientific and technological progress, even the machines are used only in high-tech manufacturing or science research labs and never touch your desktop. See Matthew Hayward&#39;s website on this topic, &quot;<a href="http://www.imsa.edu/~matth/cs299/">Quantum Computing and Shor&#39;s Algorithm</a>&quot; for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Farlops</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1176#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Farlops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1176#comment-2637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:hmm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And it&#039;s possible that nothing will come of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember all the hype about josephson junctions back in the early Eighties? Remember how gallium arsenide chips were going to revolutionize the industry? Photonics has also been &quot;just around the corner&quot; for twenty years now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then again quantum computers are supposed to be qualitatively different from classical computers so, who knows? I guess we&#039;ll all just have to wait and see if anyone actually makes commercial devices out of all this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:hmm</strong></p>
<p>And it&#39;s possible that nothing will come of it.</p>
<p>Remember all the hype about josephson junctions back in the early Eighties? Remember how gallium arsenide chips were going to revolutionize the industry? Photonics has also been &quot;just around the corner&quot; for twenty years now.</p>
<p>Then again quantum computers are supposed to be qualitatively different from classical computers so, who knows? I guess we&#39;ll all just have to wait and see if anyone actually makes commercial devices out of all this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Living Fractal</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1176#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>The Living Fractal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2002 00:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1176#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;hmm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ok I finally got this post through the lameness (or should I same lame) filter. It claims I am yelling... and I use maybe 3 acronyms... whatever..it&#039;s stupid... on to my thoughts on the article. This is all great news, and I&#039;m extremely happy to see progress, but I still wonder... I mean, ok, you build the pieces for a quantum bit and then you put them together very carefully and you get what? This spintronics stuff sounds wonderful, but how do you put it all together? I know qubits are supposedly superpositionable (lol is that a word?), but how in the heck do you program a qubit-version of MS Windows xp Pro? I mean, what!? Would a quantum computer operate under even remotely the same architecture as a pc today? Could you simply upgrade the cpu in today&#039;s pc&#039;s with a &quot;qpu&quot; or whatever? I&#039;m just trying to see how this will get to my desk. And not in ten years, I want it yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>hmm</strong></p>
<p>ok I finally got this post through the lameness (or should I same lame) filter. It claims I am yelling&#8230; and I use maybe 3 acronyms&#8230; whatever..it&#39;s stupid&#8230; on to my thoughts on the article. This is all great news, and I&#39;m extremely happy to see progress, but I still wonder&#8230; I mean, ok, you build the pieces for a quantum bit and then you put them together very carefully and you get what? This spintronics stuff sounds wonderful, but how do you put it all together? I know qubits are supposedly superpositionable (lol is that a word?), but how in the heck do you program a qubit-version of MS Windows xp Pro? I mean, what!? Would a quantum computer operate under even remotely the same architecture as a pc today? Could you simply upgrade the cpu in today&#39;s pc&#39;s with a &quot;qpu&quot; or whatever? I&#39;m just trying to see how this will get to my desk. And not in ten years, I want it yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>