<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terabit/inch storage densities by ballistic magnetoresistance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1198</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:02:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1198#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1198#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:As data storage needs continue to expand we wil&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reading this :: &quot;ferroelectric perovskite storage technologies planned are uneffected.&quot; ... and they (in theory) yield less than 5% of the theoretical density. The technology is still sound, even IF it can be killed by EMP and other types od radioactivity. Ferroelectrics are still 20 years off. Yeah ...plan for the future.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:As data storage needs continue to expand we wil</strong></p>
<p>Reading this :: &quot;ferroelectric perovskite storage technologies planned are uneffected.&quot; &#8230; and they (in theory) yield less than 5% of the theoretical density. The technology is still sound, even IF it can be killed by EMP and other types od radioactivity. Ferroelectrics are still 20 years off. Yeah &#8230;plan for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedrive</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1198#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>fedrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 02:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1198#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;As data storage needs continue to expand we will&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;need to make the best investments in technology&lt;br /&gt;
not only for the earths requirements but&lt;br /&gt;
for future space travel also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
magnetic technology is easily destroyed by&lt;br /&gt;
cosmic and magnetic radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ferroelectric perovskite storage technologies&lt;br /&gt;
planned are uneffected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
using non-contact methods for data transfer also&lt;br /&gt;
offer much higher reliability than the proposed&lt;br /&gt;
contact ballast magnoresistive storage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>As data storage needs continue to expand we will</strong></p>
<p>need to make the best investments in technology<br />
not only for the earths requirements but<br />
for future space travel also.</p>
<p>magnetic technology is easily destroyed by<br />
cosmic and magnetic radiation.</p>
<p>ferroelectric perovskite storage technologies<br />
planned are uneffected.</p>
<p>using non-contact methods for data transfer also<br />
offer much higher reliability than the proposed<br />
contact ballast magnoresistive storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
