<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spending more but commercializing less?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1217</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Farlops</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1217#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Farlops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1217#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maybe it&#039;s still too early?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On one hand, we hear all the hype that nanobulk is going to result in millions, maybe billions, in the next 2 or 3 years. But on another hand we hear that there is still a lot of thankless research and development that needs to be done and it might be 5 or 10 years before anyone sees a dime of profit. Will the result be a bunch of overenthused investors getting burned?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Europe and Canada are right to adopt a &quot;Japanese strategy&quot; of slow, steady improvements, progress and investments and waiting for the long term big payoff. The US has shot itself in the foot many times with it&#039;s impatience and willful ignorance of the facts, the current scandals on Wall Street are indirect proof of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What might happen is that dazzled US capitalists invest in the current schemes which, however well meaning, fail to materialize. The US market then turns totally sour for at least a decade. Wiser heads, with realistic expectations, elsewhere in the world pull out ahead in the intervening time. Remember the VCR? Remember transistor radios?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Maybe it&#39;s still too early?</strong></p>
<p>On one hand, we hear all the hype that nanobulk is going to result in millions, maybe billions, in the next 2 or 3 years. But on another hand we hear that there is still a lot of thankless research and development that needs to be done and it might be 5 or 10 years before anyone sees a dime of profit. Will the result be a bunch of overenthused investors getting burned?</p>
<p>Perhaps Europe and Canada are right to adopt a &quot;Japanese strategy&quot; of slow, steady improvements, progress and investments and waiting for the long term big payoff. The US has shot itself in the foot many times with it&#39;s impatience and willful ignorance of the facts, the current scandals on Wall Street are indirect proof of that.</p>
<p>What might happen is that dazzled US capitalists invest in the current schemes which, however well meaning, fail to materialize. The US market then turns totally sour for at least a decade. Wiser heads, with realistic expectations, elsewhere in the world pull out ahead in the intervening time. Remember the VCR? Remember transistor radios?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>