<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanoelectronics researcher fired</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1298</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deoxyribozyme</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1298#comment-2827</link>
		<dc:creator>deoxyribozyme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1298#comment-2827</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;His reviewers/editors share the blame.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do a quick search on your favorite journal search engine and look up Schon JH. *Nobody* can write this many research reports in that short a length of time. Look at all the Science and Nature papers the guy had. Was anyone doing a reality check on the volume of articles this guy was putting forward?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would believe that he really could have generated all the data and written all the reports if and only if he had the entire Bell Lab staff working for him. His publication record exceeds the average academic PI&#039;s output by 5-10 times easily.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His reviewers and editors were rubber stamping his papers. There should be massive amounts of egg on the faces of all those who OK&#039;ed his work. I believe that the top journals (Science, Nature) base their review process on Name first, content second.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully all of Schon&#039;s raises over the last few years were in his company&#039;s stock.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>His reviewers/editors share the blame.</strong></p>
<p>Do a quick search on your favorite journal search engine and look up Schon JH. *Nobody* can write this many research reports in that short a length of time. Look at all the Science and Nature papers the guy had. Was anyone doing a reality check on the volume of articles this guy was putting forward?</p>
<p>I would believe that he really could have generated all the data and written all the reports if and only if he had the entire Bell Lab staff working for him. His publication record exceeds the average academic PI&#39;s output by 5-10 times easily.</p>
<p>His reviewers and editors were rubber stamping his papers. There should be massive amounts of egg on the faces of all those who OK&#39;ed his work. I believe that the top journals (Science, Nature) base their review process on Name first, content second.</p>
<p>Hopefully all of Schon&#39;s raises over the last few years were in his company&#39;s stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Farlops</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1298#comment-2826</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Farlops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2002 07:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1298#comment-2826</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A portent of things to come?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I look back at my comments, intended to be humorous, when this story first broke last year and shudder. I was just joking about how freshly scrubbed Schon and the others looked, who knew?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the hype surrounding nanotech, the pressure to produce results, especially in commercial and private research labs, is going to drive a lot of fraud. Schon may be the first but he won&#039;t be the last. Hopefully it won&#039;t get so bad that researchers begin to turn away from the field in fear of their reputations.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A portent of things to come?</strong></p>
<p>I look back at my comments, intended to be humorous, when this story first broke last year and shudder. I was just joking about how freshly scrubbed Schon and the others looked, who knew?</p>
<p>Given the hype surrounding nanotech, the pressure to produce results, especially in commercial and private research labs, is going to drive a lot of fraud. Schon may be the first but he won&#39;t be the last. Hopefully it won&#39;t get so bad that researchers begin to turn away from the field in fear of their reputations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>