<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanotechnology for homeland security?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1309</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 19:22:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corwin</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1309#comment-2873</link>
		<dc:creator>Corwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1309#comment-2873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:Other governments are moving in this direction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well the &#039;counterterrorist&#039; and &#039;homeland security&#039; bit may be paranoia... but given how some environmental regs work.... toxin sensors like this might be very useful. ;)&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:Other governments are moving in this direction</strong></p>
<p>Well the &#39;counterterrorist&#39; and &#39;homeland security&#39; bit may be paranoia&#8230; but given how some environmental regs work&#8230;. toxin sensors like this might be very useful. <img src='http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Farlops</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1309#comment-2872</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Farlops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1309#comment-2872</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Other governments are moving in this direction too&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just found an article from the Russian news agency Rosbalt, mentioning &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rosbalt.com/2002/10/09/50466.html&quot;&gt;research by Moscow State University&lt;/a&gt;. Apparently chemists and biotechnologist there have developed similar toxicology sensors. Not too surprisingly paranoia is driving nanotech research both here and abroad.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Other governments are moving in this direction too</strong></p>
<p>I just found an article from the Russian news agency Rosbalt, mentioning <a href="http://www.rosbalt.com/2002/10/09/50466.html">research by Moscow State University</a>. Apparently chemists and biotechnologist there have developed similar toxicology sensors. Not too surprisingly paranoia is driving nanotech research both here and abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertBradbury</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1309#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertBradbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 18:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1309#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Not anytime soon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a big difference between macroscale detectors that can detect dozens or hundreds of molecules and nanoscale machinery that hasn&#039;t even been designed yet. There are more atoms in a nanoassembler than there are parts in a Boeing 767. The design problem is big and the assembly problem is even bigger.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Not anytime soon</strong></p>
<p>There is a big difference between macroscale detectors that can detect dozens or hundreds of molecules and nanoscale machinery that hasn&#39;t even been designed yet. There are more atoms in a nanoassembler than there are parts in a Boeing 767. The design problem is big and the assembly problem is even bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
