Comments on: Squid’s Flashlight May Lead to New Nanolights http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1422 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Anonymous Coward http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1422#comment-4202 Anonymous Coward Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:37:37 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1422#comment-4202 <p><strong>Re:Nanobulk. Zzzzzzz.</strong></p> <p>well, i think you theologian persective is no so elequtly put, you thesis. .not there, adn you point is not there the nanoltecnology is a vital part in like.. so suck on that one bioch</p> Re:Nanobulk. Zzzzzzz.

well, i think you theologian persective is no so elequtly put, you thesis. .not there, adn you point is not there the nanoltecnology is a vital part in like.. so suck on that one bioch

]]> By: Mr_Farlops http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1422#comment-4201 Mr_Farlops Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:02:24 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1422#comment-4201 <p><strong>Nanobulk. Zzzzzzz.</strong></p> <p>Aside from the obvious applications to flat panel displays and fiber-optic endoscopes, aside from the likelyhood that a company that harnesses this biotech will have VC yapping at their door, is this really newsworthy for Nanodot?<br /> <br /> Considering that many entries here over the last 12 months or so have been arguing about the disruputability of mechnosynthesis in the eyes of all the mainstream nano advocates, why are we still focusing on this nanobulk stuff?</p> Nanobulk. Zzzzzzz.

Aside from the obvious applications to flat panel displays and fiber-optic endoscopes, aside from the likelyhood that a company that harnesses this biotech will have VC yapping at their door, is this really newsworthy for Nanodot?

Considering that many entries here over the last 12 months or so have been arguing about the disruputability of mechnosynthesis in the eyes of all the mainstream nano advocates, why are we still focusing on this nanobulk stuff?

]]>