<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Request for help from Nanodot readers: Google experts needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trackersmurf</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4249</link>
		<dc:creator>trackersmurf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4249</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:here are some links on the history of NNI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through thick and thin PAIR&#039;S WORK HAS MADE HP A LEADER IN NANOTECHNOLOGY By Therese Poletti Mercury News... ``We called it the Quantum Research Initiative,&#039;&#039; he said. ``We didn&#039;t like the word nanotechnology. At that point in time, nanotechnology was really viewed as the realm of kooks.&#039;&#039; With a slight smile, Williams added that in fact nanotech is still viewed by some as a realm of kooks. http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/new s/7563605.htm&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:here are some links on the history of NNI</strong></p>
<p>Through thick and thin PAIR&#39;S WORK HAS MADE HP A LEADER IN NANOTECHNOLOGY By Therese Poletti Mercury News&#8230; &#8220;We called it the Quantum Research Initiative,&#39;&#39; he said. &#8220;We didn&#39;t like the word nanotechnology. At that point in time, nanotechnology was really viewed as the realm of kooks.&#39;&#39; With a slight smile, Williams added that in fact nanotech is still viewed by some as a realm of kooks. <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/new" rel="nofollow">http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/new</a> s/7563605.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianelegant</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4248</link>
		<dc:creator>brianelegant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4248</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;here are some links on the history of NNI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;history of NNI timeline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/nni11600/start.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/nni11600/sta rt.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/nni11600/sld003.htm&quot;&gt;history of NNI Timeline&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Nov 1996 nanotechnology group (bottom up)&lt;br /&gt;
Sep 1998 NSTC establishes IWGN&lt;br /&gt;
MAr 1999 OSTP/CT presentation on NNI&lt;br /&gt;
Draft of IWGN plan, approvals&lt;br /&gt;
Feb 2000 WH release of NNI initiative&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:4swN-K68p3EJ:commerce.senate.gov/hearings/091702williams.pdf+national+nanotechnology+initiative+controversy+williams&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&quot;&gt;williams testimony link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>here are some links on the history of NNI</strong></p>
<p>history of NNI timeline.<br />
<a href="http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/nni11600/start.htm"></a><a href="http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/nni11600/sta" rel="nofollow">http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/nni11600/sta</a> rt.htm</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/nni11600/sld003.htm">history of NNI Timeline</a><br />
Nov 1996 nanotechnology group (bottom up)<br />
Sep 1998 NSTC establishes IWGN<br />
MAr 1999 OSTP/CT presentation on NNI<br />
Draft of IWGN plan, approvals<br />
Feb 2000 WH release of NNI initiative</p>
<p><a href="http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:4swN-K68p3EJ:commerce.senate.gov/hearings/091702williams.pdf+national+nanotechnology+initiative+controversy+williams&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8">williams testimony link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liftwatch</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4247</link>
		<dc:creator>liftwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2004 02:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4247</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Found it! (I think...)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We called it the Quantum Research Initiative,&quot; he said. &quot;We didn&#039;t like the word nanotechnology. At that point in time, nanotechnology was really viewed as the realm of kooks.&quot; With a slight smile, Williams added that in fact nanotech is still viewed by some as a realm of kooks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/7563605.htm&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s the link.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Found it! (I think&#8230;)</strong></p>
<p>&quot;We called it the Quantum Research Initiative,&quot; he said. &quot;We didn&#39;t like the word nanotechnology. At that point in time, nanotechnology was really viewed as the realm of kooks.&quot; With a slight smile, Williams added that in fact nanotech is still viewed by some as a realm of kooks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/7563605.htm">Here&#39;s the link.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elypse</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4246</link>
		<dc:creator>elypse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4246</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;One more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This gets you closer: http://www.redseraphim.com/index.asp?c=article&amp;ID= 26 &quot;Dr. R. Stanley Williams of HP, one of the contributors to the government&#237;s National Nanotechnology Initiative is in so much angst about the dangers of hype to nanotechnology research that he was quoted about his mission to pop the nanotechnology bubble before it gets too big.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>One more</strong></p>
<p>This gets you closer: <a href="http://www.redseraphim.com/index.asp?c=article&#038;ID=" rel="nofollow">http://www.redseraphim.com/index.asp?c=article&#038;ID=</a> 26 &quot;Dr. R. Stanley Williams of HP, one of the contributors to the government&iacute;s National Nanotechnology Initiative is in so much angst about the dangers of hype to nanotechnology research that he was quoted about his mission to pop the nanotechnology bubble before it gets too big.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisPeterson</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4245</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisPeterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:2002 Senate Testimony&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, this was more informal, and it was specifically on their decision about whether to name the initiative with a word known to have controversial connotations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But thanks for trying!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:2002 Senate Testimony</strong></p>
<p>No, this was more informal, and it was specifically on their decision about whether to name the initiative with a word known to have controversial connotations.</p>
<p>But thanks for trying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elypse</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>elypse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1449#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2002 Senate Testimony&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not sure if this is what you wanted: http://www.mrs.org/pa/events/RSWSenTest91702.pdf&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2002 Senate Testimony</strong></p>
<p>Not sure if this is what you wanted: <a href="http://www.mrs.org/pa/events/RSWSenTest91702.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.mrs.org/pa/events/RSWSenTest91702.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>