Comments on: OLED nanotechnology displays http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1632 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Anonymous Coward http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1632#comment-4617 Anonymous Coward Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:33:53 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1632#comment-4617 <p><strong>Re:Redunant!</strong></p> <p>I thoughts show true understanding of storage technology. Thank you</p> Re:Redunant!

I thoughts show true understanding of storage technology. Thank you

]]> By: Chemisor http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1632#comment-4616 Chemisor Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:11:37 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1632#comment-4616 <p><strong>Redunant!</strong></p> <p>If you have 10 terabytes of space, it is easy to implement 3-way redunancy and have software periodically check all three copies for consistency, rewriting damaged portions to clean areas. If each copy is stored in a different area of the disk, the data thus encoded becomes nearly indestructible.</p> Redunant!

If you have 10 terabytes of space, it is easy to implement 3-way redunancy and have software periodically check all three copies for consistency, rewriting damaged portions to clean areas. If each copy is stored in a different area of the disk, the data thus encoded becomes nearly indestructible.

]]> By: Metzen http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1632#comment-4615 Metzen Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:41:04 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1632#comment-4615 <p><strong>Fragile?</strong></p> <p>The linked story talks about a 1.8 inch disk that could hold 10 terabyts of information and is read optically. Could a small scratch result in 50 GB of data loss? At such high data density, even a speck of dust could pose problems that even parity error correction couldn't correct.<br /> <br /> It's fun to dream about nonetheless.</p> Fragile?

The linked story talks about a 1.8 inch disk that could hold 10 terabyts of information and is read optically. Could a small scratch result in 50 GB of data loss? At such high data density, even a speck of dust could pose problems that even parity error correction couldn't correct.

It's fun to dream about nonetheless.

]]>