<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Animate Future Reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1641</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrettBellmore</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1641#comment-4630</link>
		<dc:creator>BrettBellmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 01:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1641#comment-4630</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:Better link&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the recent conference, I had a chance to briefly discuss this with Drexler. They&#039;e aware of the problems with the current version of the animation, and intend to address many of them in the new version. As well, I had a chance to talk to a certain heckler, (Attendees will know who I speak of.) and your concerns are valid with respect to him. But I think most people will be able to understand the difference between a concept, and a completed design.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:Better link</strong></p>
<p>At the recent conference, I had a chance to briefly discuss this with Drexler. They&#39;e aware of the problems with the current version of the animation, and intend to address many of them in the new version. As well, I had a chance to talk to a certain heckler, (Attendees will know who I speak of.) and your concerns are valid with respect to him. But I think most people will be able to understand the difference between a concept, and a completed design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1641#comment-4629</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1641#comment-4629</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Better link&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A better link is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foresight.org/animation_challenge/&quot;&gt;http://www.foresight.org/animation_challenge/&lt;/a&gt; which has some discussion of the challenge plus links to the slide show and animation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the film will probably succeed in giving people a better idea of how a nanofactory could work, it may also be open to nitpicking from critics as various details are challenged. It&#039;s possible that the film may hurt the nanotech cause by in effect forcing defenders to commit prematurely to a possibly flawed design.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Better link</strong></p>
<p>A better link is <a href="http://www.foresight.org/animation_challenge/">http://www.foresight.org/animation_challenge/</a> which has some discussion of the challenge plus links to the slide show and animation.</p>
<p>While the film will probably succeed in giving people a better idea of how a nanofactory could work, it may also be open to nitpicking from critics as various details are challenged. It&#39;s possible that the film may hurt the nanotech cause by in effect forcing defenders to commit prematurely to a possibly flawed design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>