Comments on: Nanomechanical Memory Outstrips Chip Technology http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683 examining transformative technology Fri, 03 May 2013 19:22:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Ann Scott http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-1049367 Ann Scott Mon, 25 Jul 2011 01:50:35 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-1049367 Is this kind of technology being used today? It's very possible besides most people would prefer a much faster and reliable storage device compared to the low ones. Is this kind of technology being used today? It’s very possible besides most people would prefer a much faster and reliable storage device compared to the low ones.

]]> By: Anonymous Coward http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-4710 Anonymous Coward Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:32:32 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-4710 <p><strong>Re:see also</strong></p> <p>wasnt this already on Nanodot?</p> Re:see also

wasnt this already on Nanodot?

]]> By: Anonymous Coward http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-4709 Anonymous Coward Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:06:59 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-4709 <p><strong>see also</strong></p> <p><a href="http://www.memagazine.org/backissues/sept03/features/adding/adding.html">http://www.memagazine.org/backissues/sept03/featur es/adding/adding.html</a> and <a href="http://www.trnmag.com/Stories/2004/111704/Nanomechanical_memory_demoed_111704.html">http://www.trnmag.com/Stories/2004/111704/Nanomech anical_memory_demoed_111704.html</a></p> see also

http://www.memagazine.org/backissues/sept03/featur es/adding/adding.html and http://www.trnmag.com/Stories/2004/111704/Nanomech anical_memory_demoed_111704.html

]]> By: Chemisor http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-4708 Chemisor Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:49:36 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-4708 <p><strong>Quit the advertisements already...</strong></p> <p>> I cannot believe a slow mechanical switch of low<br /> > density and poor data bandwidth can compete with<br /> > more reliable data storage below.<br /> <br /> Hot air competes admirably against hot air blowing the other way. Neither of these technologies are implemented in any practical way, so it is quite premature to say which one is the better, don't you think?<br /> <br /> Furthermore, you are wrong. "Atomic Holographic Storage" is a 2D technology, limited to a thin layer near the surface. Nanomechanical memory can easily form 3D structures with far greater capacity.<br /></p> Quit the advertisements already…

> I cannot believe a slow mechanical switch of low
> density and poor data bandwidth can compete with
> more reliable data storage below.

Hot air competes admirably against hot air blowing the other way. Neither of these technologies are implemented in any practical way, so it is quite premature to say which one is the better, don't you think?

Furthermore, you are wrong. "Atomic Holographic Storage" is a 2D technology, limited to a thin layer near the surface. Nanomechanical memory can easily form 3D structures with far greater capacity.

]]> By: Anonymous Coward http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-4707 Anonymous Coward Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:21:54 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1683#comment-4707 <p><strong>Atomic Holographic Optical Nanostorage</strong></p> <p>I cannot believe a slow mechanical switch of low density and poor data bandwidth can compete with more reliable data storage below.<br /> <br /> Atomic Holographic Optical Storage Nanotechnology will dramatically improve applications like 6,840 raw uncompressed high quality Video/TV hours, or 2,100,000 chest x-rays, or nearly 10,000,000 high-resolution images, or 30,000 four-drawer filing cabinets of documents, or 20,000 DVD'S Worm's , or 4,000 BLU-Ray Worm disk's on ONE 10 Terabyte 3.5 in. removable disc.<br /> <br /> Why Rewritable Atomic Holographic Optical Storage Nanotechnology ?<br /> <br /> - It will have highest NLO analog / digital / optical capacity available<br /> - will have lowest cost per gigabyte<br /> - will have lowest power requirement per gigabyte<br /> - will have longest archive shelf life of any data storage media, 100 years<br /> - will have widest environmental conditions and tolerances<br /> - will be only technology that scales from nano to macro solutions<br /> - will have most reliable removable read / write media available<br /> - will have highest bandwidth data transfer potential<br /> - will be direct replacement for hard disk drives<br /> - will NOT have storage media destroyed by Infrared, Visible, or Ultraviolet Light<br /> - will NOT be effected by extreme high energy EMF or Cosmic Rays<br /> i.e. Solar Flares and Solar Winds for Moon / Mars Exploration<br /> - will be nuclear/cosmic radiation hardened capable<br /> 3.5 in. disk using 5 nm particle with 100 u in. coating = ~ 1.5 EXABYTES of data storage<br /> <br /> 1.5 Exabytes equals 1536 Petabytes or 1,572,865 Terabytes per each 100 u in. of coating<br /> <br /> go to their website for further information.<br /> <br /> colossal storage<br /></p> Atomic Holographic Optical Nanostorage

I cannot believe a slow mechanical switch of low density and poor data bandwidth can compete with more reliable data storage below.

Atomic Holographic Optical Storage Nanotechnology will dramatically improve applications like 6,840 raw uncompressed high quality Video/TV hours, or 2,100,000 chest x-rays, or nearly 10,000,000 high-resolution images, or 30,000 four-drawer filing cabinets of documents, or 20,000 DVD'S Worm's , or 4,000 BLU-Ray Worm disk's on ONE 10 Terabyte 3.5 in. removable disc.

Why Rewritable Atomic Holographic Optical Storage Nanotechnology ?

- It will have highest NLO analog / digital / optical capacity available
- will have lowest cost per gigabyte
- will have lowest power requirement per gigabyte
- will have longest archive shelf life of any data storage media, 100 years
- will have widest environmental conditions and tolerances
- will be only technology that scales from nano to macro solutions
- will have most reliable removable read / write media available
- will have highest bandwidth data transfer potential
- will be direct replacement for hard disk drives
- will NOT have storage media destroyed by Infrared, Visible, or Ultraviolet Light
- will NOT be effected by extreme high energy EMF or Cosmic Rays
i.e. Solar Flares and Solar Winds for Moon / Mars Exploration
- will be nuclear/cosmic radiation hardened capable
3.5 in. disk using 5 nm particle with 100 u in. coating = ~ 1.5 EXABYTES of data storage

1.5 Exabytes equals 1536 Petabytes or 1,572,865 Terabytes per each 100 u in. of coating

go to their website for further information.

colossal storage

]]>