<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDA nanotechnology: new website, confusing NSF definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1786</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanodot: Nanotechnology News and Discussion &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A better nanotechnology definition: U.S. NNI gives up</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1786#comment-31350</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanodot: Nanotechnology News and Discussion &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A better nanotechnology definition: U.S. NNI gives up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1786#comment-31350</guid>
		<description>[...] Although the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative&#8217;s previous definition of nanotechnology was confusing, at least they were trying to make it more relevant than the usual &#8220;anything 1-100 nm&#8221; nanotech definition used by so many. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative&#8217;s previous definition of nanotechnology was confusing, at least they were trying to make it more relevant than the usual &#8220;anything 1-100 nm&#8221; nanotech definition used by so many. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>