<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Molecular manufacturing means &#8220;no pollution&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1798</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnB</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1798#comment-4923</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1798#comment-4923</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Secondary materials&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the Drexlerian nanoassembler/nanofactory concept appears to be pollution-free (except perhaps for heat), I have to wonder what all those materials and all their itty-bitty parts break down into when exposed to the chaotic environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do the breakdown byproducts cause problems along the lines that&#039;re starting to be reported for buckytubes and buckyballs? Are there good, reliable methods available to prevent such breakdown and/or scavenge the byproducts out of the environment before damage is done?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or is nanotech going to be limited to clean-room conditions?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Secondary materials</strong></p>
<p>While the Drexlerian nanoassembler/nanofactory concept appears to be pollution-free (except perhaps for heat), I have to wonder what all those materials and all their itty-bitty parts break down into when exposed to the chaotic environment.</p>
<p>Do the breakdown byproducts cause problems along the lines that&#39;re starting to be reported for buckytubes and buckyballs? Are there good, reliable methods available to prevent such breakdown and/or scavenge the byproducts out of the environment before damage is done?</p>
<p>Or is nanotech going to be limited to clean-room conditions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayakar</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1798#comment-4922</link>
		<dc:creator>jayakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1798#comment-4922</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hazardous environmental-impact predictions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the material and procedural developments in Nanoscience is by, &#235;from-top-to-down&#237; approach (reference: Feynman&#237;s concepts), early-predictions on hazardous environmental-impacts may be unnecessary and misleading. That is, the regulations for the Environmental-friendliness of Nanoscience-developments; has to be a time to time proceeding only.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hazardous environmental-impact predictions</strong></p>
<p>Since the material and procedural developments in Nanoscience is by, &euml;from-top-to-down&iacute; approach (reference: Feynman&iacute;s concepts), early-predictions on hazardous environmental-impacts may be unnecessary and misleading. That is, the regulations for the Environmental-friendliness of Nanoscience-developments; has to be a time to time proceeding only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>