<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soon to be released &#8216;Exploring Nanotechnology&#8217; CD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1900</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chemisor</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1900#comment-5135</link>
		<dc:creator>Chemisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 18:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1900#comment-5135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:just what we need.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&gt; Why does everyone think that the key to getting&lt;br /&gt;
&gt; nanotechnology here is getting people &quot;excited&quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probably because all scientists have no money whatsoever and are struggling to make the ends meet just to run the experiments they are already working on. Really, it&#039;s just too much to expect people to think on their own free time. What&#039;s free time anyhow?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:just what we need.</strong></p>
<p>&gt; Why does everyone think that the key to getting<br />
&gt; nanotechnology here is getting people &quot;excited&quot;?</p>
<p>Probably because all scientists have no money whatsoever and are struggling to make the ends meet just to run the experiments they are already working on. Really, it&#39;s just too much to expect people to think on their own free time. What&#39;s free time anyhow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1900#comment-5134</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 17:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1900#comment-5134</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;just what we need.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Imagine what would happen if you could introduce your break-through technology to thousands of viewers comprised of venture capitalists, banks, investors, brokerage firms, industrial and research players?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probably nothing of any value whatsoever. You might succeed in getting more worthless hype, though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does everyone think that the key to getting nanotechnology here is getting people &quot;excited&quot;? The key is doing hard work in laboratories, not getting banking types who barely know what an atom is to throw money around at random.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>just what we need.</strong></p>
<p>&quot;Imagine what would happen if you could introduce your break-through technology to thousands of viewers comprised of venture capitalists, banks, investors, brokerage firms, industrial and research players?&quot;</p>
<p>Probably nothing of any value whatsoever. You might succeed in getting more worthless hype, though.</p>
<p>Why does everyone think that the key to getting nanotechnology here is getting people &quot;excited&quot;? The key is doing hard work in laboratories, not getting banking types who barely know what an atom is to throw money around at random.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>