<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Environmental Defense wants 10% of nanofunding for risk ID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1938</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1938#comment-5228</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 02:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1938#comment-5228</guid>
		<description>the fox loose amongst the in the henhouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fox loose amongst the in the henhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock Hinzmann</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1938#comment-5207</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock Hinzmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 23:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1938#comment-5207</guid>
		<description>Since we expect nanoparticles to have properties that are different from bulk chemicals, in order to perform new functions for us, it can be expected that the health impacts of such nanoparticles might also be different. However, we know very little about the health impacts of most chemicals, let alone nanoparticles, on the average consumer (as opposed to workplace exposures). We know these chemicals build up and are easily detected in the body, but there is little evidence, one way or the other, about how they impact our health. Some groups are trying to get funding to at least study the burden on the body of such chemicals. Maybe nanotech will finally provide the means for such a study. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we expect nanoparticles to have properties that are different from bulk chemicals, in order to perform new functions for us, it can be expected that the health impacts of such nanoparticles might also be different. However, we know very little about the health impacts of most chemicals, let alone nanoparticles, on the average consumer (as opposed to workplace exposures). We know these chemicals build up and are easily detected in the body, but there is little evidence, one way or the other, about how they impact our health. Some groups are trying to get funding to at least study the burden on the body of such chemicals. Maybe nanotech will finally provide the means for such a study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1938#comment-5204</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 17:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1938#comment-5204</guid>
		<description>Sounds almost as bad as Real ID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds almost as bad as Real ID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>