<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lux Research warns of nanotech risks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1967</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bradbury</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1967#comment-5297</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=1967#comment-5297</guid>
		<description>I wonder if anyone at Lux or LockMart or Kraft has read &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMIIA.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nanomedicine, Volume IIA: Biocompatibility&lt;/a&gt;.  If they haven&#039;t then all of the &quot;sound and fury&quot; is coming from people who haven&#039;t done their homework.

Since &quot;nanomolecules&quot; are nothing more than somewhat more complex molecules that the chemical industry has been building for decades and which are well regulated from health and safety standpoints the entire discussion sounds like people who don&#039;t know what they are talking about.

We have been dealing with these issues for a very long time -- I have yet to see anything which suggests that we should deal with &quot;nanomolecules&quot; in any way differently from the way we would deal other new molecules given the lessons that DDT, PCBs, CFCs, MTBE, lead, asbestos, etc. have taught us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if anyone at Lux or LockMart or Kraft has read <a HREF="http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMIIA.htm" rel="nofollow">Nanomedicine, Volume IIA: Biocompatibility</a>.  If they haven&#8217;t then all of the &#8220;sound and fury&#8221; is coming from people who haven&#8217;t done their homework.</p>
<p>Since &#8220;nanomolecules&#8221; are nothing more than somewhat more complex molecules that the chemical industry has been building for decades and which are well regulated from health and safety standpoints the entire discussion sounds like people who don&#8217;t know what they are talking about.</p>
<p>We have been dealing with these issues for a very long time &#8212; I have yet to see anything which suggests that we should deal with &#8220;nanomolecules&#8221; in any way differently from the way we would deal other new molecules given the lessons that DDT, PCBs, CFCs, MTBE, lead, asbestos, etc. have taught us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>