<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Superstrong nanotube sheets made, targeted at solar sails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5676</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5676</guid>
		<description>How thick would the material have to be to stop a high powered .308 round?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How thick would the material have to be to stop a high powered .308 round?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5628</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5628</guid>
		<description>The difference is ... they&#039;re making it. Sheets of pure CNT 5cm across, 50 nanometers thick, supporting structures thousands of times its own weight ... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8976160/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is &#8230; they&#8217;re making it. Sheets of pure CNT 5cm across, 50 nanometers thick, supporting structures thousands of times its own weight &#8230; <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8976160/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8976160/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanoman</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5620</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5620</guid>
		<description>This is very amazing but my question is this:  The articles claim the nanotube sheets are stronger than steel. Does this mean we can grow these sheets not only for solar cells, but, also as new structural materials to replace structural steel? What would the limits of using this PARTICULAR METHOD to make nanotube structural materials and walls, armor etc? 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very amazing but my question is this:  The articles claim the nanotube sheets are stronger than steel. Does this mean we can grow these sheets not only for solar cells, but, also as new structural materials to replace structural steel? What would the limits of using this PARTICULAR METHOD to make nanotube structural materials and walls, armor etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5617</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5617</guid>
		<description>Robert, it&#039;s no disrespect to Drexler&#039;s Masters thesis to point out that there&#039;s a substantial difference between suggesting something theoretically and finding out a way to implement it in practise.  If you can do it in a lab, it&#039;s new, no matter how long ago it was that someone said you can do it in principle.  My copy of Nanosystems isn&#039;t to hand, but doesn&#039;t it say in the dedication something like &quot;To the experimentalists - they do all the hard work&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, it&#8217;s no disrespect to Drexler&#8217;s Masters thesis to point out that there&#8217;s a substantial difference between suggesting something theoretically and finding out a way to implement it in practise.  If you can do it in a lab, it&#8217;s new, no matter how long ago it was that someone said you can do it in principle.  My copy of Nanosystems isn&#8217;t to hand, but doesn&#8217;t it say in the dedication something like &#8220;To the experimentalists &#8211; they do all the hard work&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5610</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5610</guid>
		<description>Is not the newness that this group is more successfully implementing and engineering the theories that Drexler had about solar sails than other groups. Being able to spin the sheets of trillions of pure carbon nanotubes of nearly any length and being able to easily work with them seems to be a good way to bring the properties of single carbon nanotubes to wide applications. Thus this seems important for all of the commercial applications in artificial muscles, protective clothing, thermal heat pipes, sensors, electron field emitters, ultra-high intensity lamps, displays, structural composites, supercapacitors, batteries, fuel cells and electronic textiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is not the newness that this group is more successfully implementing and engineering the theories that Drexler had about solar sails than other groups. Being able to spin the sheets of trillions of pure carbon nanotubes of nearly any length and being able to easily work with them seems to be a good way to bring the properties of single carbon nanotubes to wide applications. Thus this seems important for all of the commercial applications in artificial muscles, protective clothing, thermal heat pipes, sensors, electron field emitters, ultra-high intensity lamps, displays, structural composites, supercapacitors, batteries, fuel cells and electronic textiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5606</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5606</guid>
		<description>But here is my question regarding this nanotube sheet-making ability. Instead of solar cells, can the stuff be used to produce STRUCTURAL sheets of nanotube material that is stronger than steel? The articles claim that the stuff is stronger than steel for the same weight, so, if they thicken it up a bit, say they make a quarter inch thick sheet of it, will that be able to be formed into I Beams and car body shells and armor and so on and so forth, and be ultra tough and strong? 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But here is my question regarding this nanotube sheet-making ability. Instead of solar cells, can the stuff be used to produce STRUCTURAL sheets of nanotube material that is stronger than steel? The articles claim that the stuff is stronger than steel for the same weight, so, if they thicken it up a bit, say they make a quarter inch thick sheet of it, will that be able to be formed into I Beams and car body shells and armor and so on and so forth, and be ultra tough and strong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Novak</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>John Novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>Robert?

When you can show me one reference, anywhere, to Drexler producing materials like this-- not describing the materials, not describing how they might be produced, but actually producing materials like this, in macro quantities, no less-- then I will concede that this is neither new nor newsworthy.

The significance here is that these materials are now being produced nearly as quickly as commercially spun wool.  Do not turn your nose up at the leap from abstract theory to a commercially viable, macro-scalable process.  If it were trivial, it would have been &lt;i&gt;done&lt;/i&gt;twenty years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert?</p>
<p>When you can show me one reference, anywhere, to Drexler producing materials like this&#8211; not describing the materials, not describing how they might be produced, but actually producing materials like this, in macro quantities, no less&#8211; then I will concede that this is neither new nor newsworthy.</p>
<p>The significance here is that these materials are now being produced nearly as quickly as commercially spun wool.  Do not turn your nose up at the leap from abstract theory to a commercially viable, macro-scalable process.  If it were trivial, it would have been <i>done</i>twenty years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5593</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5593</guid>
		<description>There is also an article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8976160/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MSNBC&lt;/a&gt; reporting the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also an article on <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8976160/" rel="nofollow">MSNBC</a> reporting the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5592</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5592</guid>
		<description>Also see:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050815/full/050815-8.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nature&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8976160/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MSNBC&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also see:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050815/full/050815-8.html" rel="nofollow">Nature</a><br />
<a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8976160/" rel="nofollow">MSNBC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bradbury</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5589</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2010#comment-5589</guid>
		<description>As I have pointed out elsewhere these facts were explored in Drexler&#039;s Masters Thesis at MIT some 20+ years ago.  There isn&#039;t much that appears to be new here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have pointed out elsewhere these facts were explored in Drexler&#8217;s Masters Thesis at MIT some 20+ years ago.  There isn&#8217;t much that appears to be new here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>