<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Productive Nanosystems Roadmap gets underway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2084</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2084#comment-7175</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 02:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2084#comment-7175</guid>
		<description>My understanding is that this is an iterative process, with the stages something like: Working Group, Steering Committee, corporate sponsors (in Dec 2006?), public review.  There is a stage (multiple months) when the corporate sponsors see it in advance of public review, to compensate them for their financial support.  Then, hopefully, people both find it useful and see ways to improve it, and we repeat the process and update the Roadmap, continuing until we reach the longer-term goals. 

One can also imagine a more open-source-style Roadmap process.  Would be interesting to see which worked better. Thanks for writing! —Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that this is an iterative process, with the stages something like: Working Group, Steering Committee, corporate sponsors (in Dec 2006?), public review.  There is a stage (multiple months) when the corporate sponsors see it in advance of public review, to compensate them for their financial support.  Then, hopefully, people both find it useful and see ways to improve it, and we repeat the process and update the Roadmap, continuing until we reach the longer-term goals. </p>
<p>One can also imagine a more open-source-style Roadmap process.  Would be interesting to see which worked better. Thanks for writing! —Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2084#comment-7165</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2084#comment-7165</guid>
		<description>So does this community get to see working drafts of the roadmap and comment on them? Or is the final product going to be presented to the world as a fait accompli?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this community get to see working drafts of the roadmap and comment on them? Or is the final product going to be presented to the world as a fait accompli?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>