<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strong, stable DNA tetrahedra made quickly with high yield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bradbury</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7382</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7382</guid>
		<description>This sounds like nano-hype.  Anyone with a knowledge of DNA hydrogen bonding and structure, or familiar with Nadrian Seemans work, would recognize that you can build self-assembling structures out of DNA.  The yields are a function of how carefully you control the DNA sequences to avoid mismatched pairing as the self-assembly takes place.  It is highly questionable as to whether you can use such structures as scaffolds for other work.  The easy locations to vary in the DNA chemical structure are the specific bases which are within the structure itself.  The DNA backbone is going to be on the outside of the structure and it is going to be much less easy to vary that and still build something.

I question whether many things you will see published regarding nanoscale self-assembly will be able to pass the &quot;non-obvious&quot; test at the patent level.  They might get by a patent examiner who is unfamiliar with the technology but I find it doubtful that they would stand up in court.  (But bear in mind I am not a patent expert.)

This gets a &quot;yawn&quot; from me, rather than a &quot;That is *really* cool!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like nano-hype.  Anyone with a knowledge of DNA hydrogen bonding and structure, or familiar with Nadrian Seemans work, would recognize that you can build self-assembling structures out of DNA.  The yields are a function of how carefully you control the DNA sequences to avoid mismatched pairing as the self-assembly takes place.  It is highly questionable as to whether you can use such structures as scaffolds for other work.  The easy locations to vary in the DNA chemical structure are the specific bases which are within the structure itself.  The DNA backbone is going to be on the outside of the structure and it is going to be much less easy to vary that and still build something.</p>
<p>I question whether many things you will see published regarding nanoscale self-assembly will be able to pass the &#8220;non-obvious&#8221; test at the patent level.  They might get by a patent examiner who is unfamiliar with the technology but I find it doubtful that they would stand up in court.  (But bear in mind I am not a patent expert.)</p>
<p>This gets a &#8220;yawn&#8221; from me, rather than a &#8220;That is *really* cool!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander M Zoltai</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7349</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander M Zoltai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7349</guid>
		<description>Is it to be assumed that these are primarily &quot;scaffolds&quot; to be used to build up other structures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it to be assumed that these are primarily &#8220;scaffolds&#8221; to be used to build up other structures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup Sheshadri</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7329</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup Sheshadri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7329</guid>
		<description>what are the benefits that we can get by synthesizing such &#039;complex DNA nanostructures&#039;?is this going to provide cheaper and effective medicines than today?
please provide me the knowledge of &#039;scope of these nanostructures&#039; for humans, and animals and plants in general</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are the benefits that we can get by synthesizing such &#8216;complex DNA nanostructures&#8217;?is this going to provide cheaper and effective medicines than today?<br />
please provide me the knowledge of &#8216;scope of these nanostructures&#8217; for humans, and animals and plants in general</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepankar Chatterjee</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7327</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepankar Chatterjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7327</guid>
		<description>Will this help in the creation of some rudimentary inert virus, that can be used to place some important  genetic modulational structure , produced by genetic engineers, into the body of any organism?. What is the level of stability of these structures?..... Any way... good job. I&#039;ll like to know more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this help in the creation of some rudimentary inert virus, that can be used to place some important  genetic modulational structure , produced by genetic engineers, into the body of any organism?. What is the level of stability of these structures?&#8230;.. Any way&#8230; good job. I&#8217;ll like to know more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin L. Burger</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7325</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin L. Burger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2116#comment-7325</guid>
		<description>This is incredible news and a major step forward.
I would like to learn more about what it takes to get the 95% to 99.99% and
thoughts, feel free to contact me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is incredible news and a major step forward.<br />
I would like to learn more about what it takes to get the 95% to 99.99% and<br />
thoughts, feel free to contact me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>