<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Reynolds&#8217; book covers nanotech &amp; power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Huggan</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161#comment-7888</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Huggan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161#comment-7888</guid>
		<description>Have you ever read the Bible?  Same thing.  Tehran has a very vital nanotech R+D program.  It is not world class but they certainly make contributions.  Don&#039;t confuse religion and extremism.  Remind me who trained and armed Muslim extremists in the 1980&#039;s?  Worse case scenario is that an extremist successfully smuggles a small nuke in a container ship.  The civilian casualties would still not exceed those being incurred right now by Iran&#039;s neighbour.  The American military-industrial complex&#039;s permanent war footing is much more dangerous than is brainwashed kids with weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever read the Bible?  Same thing.  Tehran has a very vital nanotech R+D program.  It is not world class but they certainly make contributions.  Don&#8217;t confuse religion and extremism.  Remind me who trained and armed Muslim extremists in the 1980&#8242;s?  Worse case scenario is that an extremist successfully smuggles a small nuke in a container ship.  The civilian casualties would still not exceed those being incurred right now by Iran&#8217;s neighbour.  The American military-industrial complex&#8217;s permanent war footing is much more dangerous than is brainwashed kids with weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161#comment-7873</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161#comment-7873</guid>
		<description>Has this dude ever heard of the moslems? The koran has an exortation to &quot;slay all unbelievers&quot; the thought of nanotech in the hands of the Iranian government scares the living hell out of me. Idealogy and technology are not always a good mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has this dude ever heard of the moslems? The koran has an exortation to &#8220;slay all unbelievers&#8221; the thought of nanotech in the hands of the Iranian government scares the living hell out of me. Idealogy and technology are not always a good mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Huggan</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161#comment-7869</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Huggan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161#comment-7869</guid>
		<description>Is the author suggesting ubiquitous nano consumer products is a good thing, or that ubiquitous nano weaponry is a good thing?  I can see how the former would apply as it would give people one less reason to be pissed off at other people.  The latter is silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the author suggesting ubiquitous nano consumer products is a good thing, or that ubiquitous nano weaponry is a good thing?  I can see how the former would apply as it would give people one less reason to be pissed off at other people.  The latter is silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161#comment-7853</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2161#comment-7853</guid>
		<description>The idea has been explored before, in science fiction. My proffered example would be the Diamond Age (Neal Stephenson), which explores a variety of cultural models enabled by nanotech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea has been explored before, in science fiction. My proffered example would be the Diamond Age (Neal Stephenson), which explores a variety of cultural models enabled by nanotech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>