http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2218 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2218#comment-10346 Matthe Mon, 08 May 2006 17:10:14 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2218#comment-10346 That's one way of looking at it, but then they might not be seeking 'profit'. The program requires funding. That’s one way of looking at it, but then they might not be seeking ‘profit’. The program requires funding.

]]> http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2218#comment-10248 What's Next In Science & Technology Sun, 07 May 2006 22:48:54 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2218#comment-10248 I agree. Our taxes already paid for the book. We shouldn't have to pay again. I agree. Our taxes already paid for the book. We shouldn’t have to pay again.

]]> http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2218#comment-9482 robert Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:46:48 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2218#comment-9482 " It’s silly to tie up federally-funded information in expensive paper formats. " I absolutely agree with this statement. Not quite silly perhaps; I'm not sure it can muster enough sense to be called silly: down right ridiculous I would rather call it. Foolish to choose profit over proliferation of information like that. ”
It’s silly to tie up federally-funded information in expensive paper formats.
”
I absolutely agree with this statement. Not quite silly perhaps; I’m not sure it can muster enough sense to be called silly: down right ridiculous I would rather call it. Foolish to choose profit over proliferation of information like that.

]]>