<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small investors get another nanotech option&#8230;sort of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2264</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Witmer</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2264#comment-23019</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Witmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2264#comment-23019</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  You&#039;d be better off investing time and money in an intelligently organized libertarian movement in Alaska.

If you want nanotech proper to produce mass wealth (as opposed to mass death), you need a free (libertarian, objectivist) country first.  Read &quot;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress&quot; &quot;The Ominous Parallels&quot; &quot;No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority&quot; &quot;Atlas Shrugged&quot; &quot;Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal&quot; &quot;Freedom&#039;s Fall in Hong Kong&quot; etc...

What artilect (created by a nanotech singularity) would tolerate all the silly rules we&#039;ve made that violate individual rights?  Answer: none.  It might contrl us, it might ignore us.  If an ignorant government (and they all are) attacks it (initiates force), it WILL retaliate (as all super-fit organisms do).

It would be like a hornet&#039;s nest attacking a man with a flamethrower.  If however, an artilect is born into a free society, it might choose to compete voluntarily and eschew force.  This would be a better way to give a superior intellignece what it wants.  That way, we don&#039;t necessarily need to part with our lives.

Just a suggestion.

-Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  You&#8217;d be better off investing time and money in an intelligently organized libertarian movement in Alaska.</p>
<p>If you want nanotech proper to produce mass wealth (as opposed to mass death), you need a free (libertarian, objectivist) country first.  Read &#8220;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress&#8221; &#8220;The Ominous Parallels&#8221; &#8220;No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority&#8221; &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; &#8220;Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal&#8221; &#8220;Freedom&#8217;s Fall in Hong Kong&#8221; etc&#8230;</p>
<p>What artilect (created by a nanotech singularity) would tolerate all the silly rules we&#8217;ve made that violate individual rights?  Answer: none.  It might contrl us, it might ignore us.  If an ignorant government (and they all are) attacks it (initiates force), it WILL retaliate (as all super-fit organisms do).</p>
<p>It would be like a hornet&#8217;s nest attacking a man with a flamethrower.  If however, an artilect is born into a free society, it might choose to compete voluntarily and eschew force.  This would be a better way to give a superior intellignece what it wants.  That way, we don&#8217;t necessarily need to part with our lives.</p>
<p>Just a suggestion.</p>
<p>-Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric T.</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2264#comment-21316</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2264#comment-21316</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s kind of sad--I&#039;ve been intending to invest in nanotechnology for quite some time, but I keep procrastinating on the research.  I suppose that&#039;s in part due to my fascination with the notional/theoretical aspects thereof, especially 30 or more years down the road.  Nanopowders and nanocoatings just don&#039;t do it for me, I guess.  I&#039;m also very sensitive to the ethical aspects, so when I do get around to investing, I&#039;ll need to thoroughly research all aspects of the companies in which I&#039;ll invest.  As a result, I&#039;m less inclined to go for a blanket organization like the abovementioned.  But, as you (Christine) said, it may still be a great (financially profitable, I assume) investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kind of sad&#8211;I&#8217;ve been intending to invest in nanotechnology for quite some time, but I keep procrastinating on the research.  I suppose that&#8217;s in part due to my fascination with the notional/theoretical aspects thereof, especially 30 or more years down the road.  Nanopowders and nanocoatings just don&#8217;t do it for me, I guess.  I&#8217;m also very sensitive to the ethical aspects, so when I do get around to investing, I&#8217;ll need to thoroughly research all aspects of the companies in which I&#8217;ll invest.  As a result, I&#8217;m less inclined to go for a blanket organization like the abovementioned.  But, as you (Christine) said, it may still be a great (financially profitable, I assume) investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>