<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UNESCO on nanotechnology ethics &amp; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281#comment-25353</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281#comment-25353</guid>
		<description>To David -- Yes, this is definitely a dual-use set of technologies. --CP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To David &#8212; Yes, this is definitely a dual-use set of technologies. &#8211;CP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Billington</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281#comment-25334</link>
		<dc:creator>David Billington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281#comment-25334</guid>
		<description>Christine,

The microchip got through its early years in the 1960s with the help of military procurement.  The invention of the pocket calculator brought commercial viability later.  I believe that nano technology is of interest to the U.S. military and undoubtedly to the armed forces of other countries as well.  Could defense applications sustain the technology until it becomes economical to serve the civilian market?  Is there a crossover potential?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine,</p>
<p>The microchip got through its early years in the 1960s with the help of military procurement.  The invention of the pocket calculator brought commercial viability later.  I believe that nano technology is of interest to the U.S. military and undoubtedly to the armed forces of other countries as well.  Could defense applications sustain the technology until it becomes economical to serve the civilian market?  Is there a crossover potential?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281#comment-25212</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281#comment-25212</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew -- I think we have done this.  Keep those ideas coming!  --C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew &#8212; I think we have done this.  Keep those ideas coming!  &#8211;C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew W.</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281#comment-25189</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2281#comment-25189</guid>
		<description>Maybe Nanodot should apply to the UN as an advisory NGO on nanotech. The UN may end up being the best forum for international debate, cooperation, and the implementation of legal frameworks regarding nanotech. I daresay they would be ideal in this regard as nanotech not only promises fulfillment of Millenium goals, but is also the best hope for worldwide implementation of the UN Charter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Nanodot should apply to the UN as an advisory NGO on nanotech. The UN may end up being the best forum for international debate, cooperation, and the implementation of legal frameworks regarding nanotech. I daresay they would be ideal in this regard as nanotech not only promises fulfillment of Millenium goals, but is also the best hope for worldwide implementation of the UN Charter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>