<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanotechnology competition: India vs. Singapore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harikrishnan.J</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57469</link>
		<dc:creator>Harikrishnan.J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57469</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t really blame with the kind of Nanotech support system India has, esp. technical know-how &amp; institutions to support Nanotech start-ups. But over a longer time-frame I am confident that India will pick-up (due to it&#039;s huge technical brainpower which i feel is better than the other Asian giant China) in Nanotechnology R&amp;D and really Nanotech being &quot;Bangalored&quot; will be the norm than it being &quot;Singapored&quot; or &quot;Shanghaied&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t really blame with the kind of Nanotech support system India has, esp. technical know-how &amp; institutions to support Nanotech start-ups. But over a longer time-frame I am confident that India will pick-up (due to it&#8217;s huge technical brainpower which i feel is better than the other Asian giant China) in Nanotechnology R&amp;D and really Nanotech being &#8220;Bangalored&#8221; will be the norm than it being &#8220;Singapored&#8221; or &#8220;Shanghaied&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57371</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 06:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57371</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that countries compete to attract firms.  It&#039;s a shame that India is not succeeding at this as well as it might.  On the bright side, it&#039;s visible losses such as this that will encourage India to continue to improve its business climate.  --Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that countries compete to attract firms.  It&#8217;s a shame that India is not succeeding at this as well as it might.  On the bright side, it&#8217;s visible losses such as this that will encourage India to continue to improve its business climate.  &#8211;Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57236</guid>
		<description>Is &#039;poaching&#039; somehow wrong? Should countries not try to attract foreign firms? This is strange ethics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8216;poaching&#8217; somehow wrong? Should countries not try to attract foreign firms? This is strange ethics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERabani</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57087</link>
		<dc:creator>ERabani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57087</guid>
		<description>IMHO the shame is that we&#039;ve yet to outgrow nationalism.  

As a vaguely related tangent, I just heard something on the BBC...an IDF artillery commander describing the procedure for firing cluster bomb armed rockets at Lebanon.  Although there were human soldiers in the firing loop, their involvement was transfering a coordinate file from a message to a control computer and clicking execute.  The coordinates derived from detections of Kyatusha launches.  In other words, if this account is accurate, there was no human judgement in the firing loop.  Frankly, this is much more alarming than the fact that cluster-bombs were used. Although this shows (what we knew) that mnt is unnecessary to the full automation of warfare, it also shows that we are late in dealing with this issue, which will likely become more widespread as automation technology in general and mnt in particular find uses in the conduct of warfare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO the shame is that we&#8217;ve yet to outgrow nationalism.  </p>
<p>As a vaguely related tangent, I just heard something on the BBC&#8230;an IDF artillery commander describing the procedure for firing cluster bomb armed rockets at Lebanon.  Although there were human soldiers in the firing loop, their involvement was transfering a coordinate file from a message to a control computer and clicking execute.  The coordinates derived from detections of Kyatusha launches.  In other words, if this account is accurate, there was no human judgement in the firing loop.  Frankly, this is much more alarming than the fact that cluster-bombs were used. Although this shows (what we knew) that mnt is unnecessary to the full automation of warfare, it also shows that we are late in dealing with this issue, which will likely become more widespread as automation technology in general and mnt in particular find uses in the conduct of warfare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57005</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-57005</guid>
		<description>Certainly we want the U.S. to continue its strong position in nanotech, but I&#039;m not sure that we need to poach home-grown Indian companies...  —Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly we want the U.S. to continue its strong position in nanotech, but I&#8217;m not sure that we need to poach home-grown Indian companies&#8230;  —Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-56346</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2357#comment-56346</guid>
		<description>Why is it a shame india should lose out compared to Singapore? shouldn&#039;t it be a shame that companies are not relocating to the US?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it a shame india should lose out compared to Singapore? shouldn&#8217;t it be a shame that companies are not relocating to the US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>