<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista: potential negative impact on nanotechnology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin G. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-127244</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin G. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-127244</guid>
		<description>The ‘Little’ Computer Company from Redmond is being even more insidious than it would first appear, try downloading Mozilla Firefox on a machine running Vista. Be prepared to reinstall the system afterward. We are a Unix/Linux/OS operation and have no intention of ever changing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ‘Little’ Computer Company from Redmond is being even more insidious than it would first appear, try downloading Mozilla Firefox on a machine running Vista. Be prepared to reinstall the system afterward. We are a Unix/Linux/OS operation and have no intention of ever changing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex Spoon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-125702</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex Spoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-125702</guid>
		<description>Since Microsoft is a private company, nobody is forced to use their software.  You can already use OS/X, which costs more but which is correspondingly nicer.  Technical users, such as the people making new nanotech, can use Linux for free.

There is a related issue to worry about, however: what happens if the *government* starts putting Vista-like requirements on our machines?  The Inducing Infringement Act makes a step in this direction, because a non-complaint machine could be considered an inducement to infringe.  The open document initiative of Massachussetts is a step in the opposite direction, because it suggests that any software is usable so long as it interacts properly in public.  Overall, we must be vigilant to maintain the freedom we have over our personal and professional machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Microsoft is a private company, nobody is forced to use their software.  You can already use OS/X, which costs more but which is correspondingly nicer.  Technical users, such as the people making new nanotech, can use Linux for free.</p>
<p>There is a related issue to worry about, however: what happens if the *government* starts putting Vista-like requirements on our machines?  The Inducing Infringement Act makes a step in this direction, because a non-complaint machine could be considered an inducement to infringe.  The open document initiative of Massachussetts is a step in the opposite direction, because it suggests that any software is usable so long as it interacts properly in public.  Overall, we must be vigilant to maintain the freedom we have over our personal and professional machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-125460</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-125460</guid>
		<description>http://www.opencores.org/ contains a large assortment of designs for CPUs.  Some of these, such as the OpenRISC 1200, are capable of running Linux.  The site also contains designs for other devices, such as Ethernet controllers, VGA monitor drivers, and more.  Currently, these can be implemented in FPGAs (or HP&#039;s new FPNIs) or in ASICs if you can afford to mass-produce them.  With molecular manufacturing, these designs (along with a compiler that targets molecular circuits rather than FPGAs) will enable us to manufacture our own computers according to open-source designs instead of settling for whatever Microsoft forces on PC component and system manufacturers.  With open-source hardware will come the same explosion of reliable, innovative systems as has happened in software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.opencores.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opencores.org/</a> contains a large assortment of designs for CPUs.  Some of these, such as the OpenRISC 1200, are capable of running Linux.  The site also contains designs for other devices, such as Ethernet controllers, VGA monitor drivers, and more.  Currently, these can be implemented in FPGAs (or HP&#8217;s new FPNIs) or in ASICs if you can afford to mass-produce them.  With molecular manufacturing, these designs (along with a compiler that targets molecular circuits rather than FPGAs) will enable us to manufacture our own computers according to open-source designs instead of settling for whatever Microsoft forces on PC component and system manufacturers.  With open-source hardware will come the same explosion of reliable, innovative systems as has happened in software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-125212</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-125212</guid>
		<description>TinyOS is probably more relevant to nanotech.  

WinModems or high end graphics adapters probably illustrate the most likely effect:  a business induces other businesses to use its proprietary specification, based in large part on its predominance in the market, or based on particular tech advantages.  Other businesses must chose to follow their competitors or settle for niche markets--the point is most decided they&#039;d do better for themselves by collaborating with the scheme.  This limits availability of cheap hardware, or compatibility of high end hardware for other OSs, but life goes on.  By now, ethernet has almost eliminated WinModems.  Note that this situation arose on to of open standards like V90 and SVGA and that there were never any huge barriers to anyone wanting to manufacture devices implementing them.  Most likely, nanotech will make many things much cheaper, even if it makes a few companies obscenely rich.

Secrecy is one way of protecting technology or content, but there are others.  If this really got implemented, professional pirates will likely get around this content protection in no time, but it might impede Joe Consumer for a while--i.e. recreational shoplifting will be curbed but organized crime will likely profit all the more for that very reason. The point is it won&#039;t accomplish what it&#039;s promising for content creators very well for very long.    As for actual security, all of the stuff that a user wants secured is unprotected by HDCP; malware might not be any more able to pirate your music than you are but it will still be able to do everything you can with your machine.

In all likelihood, the market will balk at hardware that won&#039;t run anything but Vista; machines might have a some Vista-only features, but considering that servers represent a major market and neither need nor would tolerate HDCP but do like cheap, flexible hardware and open source software, these aren&#039;t going to disappear anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TinyOS is probably more relevant to nanotech.  </p>
<p>WinModems or high end graphics adapters probably illustrate the most likely effect:  a business induces other businesses to use its proprietary specification, based in large part on its predominance in the market, or based on particular tech advantages.  Other businesses must chose to follow their competitors or settle for niche markets&#8211;the point is most decided they&#8217;d do better for themselves by collaborating with the scheme.  This limits availability of cheap hardware, or compatibility of high end hardware for other OSs, but life goes on.  By now, ethernet has almost eliminated WinModems.  Note that this situation arose on to of open standards like V90 and SVGA and that there were never any huge barriers to anyone wanting to manufacture devices implementing them.  Most likely, nanotech will make many things much cheaper, even if it makes a few companies obscenely rich.</p>
<p>Secrecy is one way of protecting technology or content, but there are others.  If this really got implemented, professional pirates will likely get around this content protection in no time, but it might impede Joe Consumer for a while&#8211;i.e. recreational shoplifting will be curbed but organized crime will likely profit all the more for that very reason. The point is it won&#8217;t accomplish what it&#8217;s promising for content creators very well for very long.    As for actual security, all of the stuff that a user wants secured is unprotected by HDCP; malware might not be any more able to pirate your music than you are but it will still be able to do everything you can with your machine.</p>
<p>In all likelihood, the market will balk at hardware that won&#8217;t run anything but Vista; machines might have a some Vista-only features, but considering that servers represent a major market and neither need nor would tolerate HDCP but do like cheap, flexible hardware and open source software, these aren&#8217;t going to disappear anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-125184</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-125184</guid>
		<description>Simple support open-source projects only such as linux and provide no and i mean no support for windows no drivers or anything... Intel and all of you working at nanotechnology would be setting an example for companies everywhere... It would certainly shake things up and other comapnies would follow Intel they are looking for those who would take a shot in the dark on Linux... Thus after 25 years making the pc completely open as it should be... I would buy a Linux only chipset and I know thousands of other opensource enthusiasts who would... Yes you would screw Aunt Tilly out of the utter speed but she wouldnt want it anyhow... I say take a chance and jump in faith on Jesus above... You wont be sorry... My two cents for what they are worth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple support open-source projects only such as linux and provide no and i mean no support for windows no drivers or anything&#8230; Intel and all of you working at nanotechnology would be setting an example for companies everywhere&#8230; It would certainly shake things up and other comapnies would follow Intel they are looking for those who would take a shot in the dark on Linux&#8230; Thus after 25 years making the pc completely open as it should be&#8230; I would buy a Linux only chipset and I know thousands of other opensource enthusiasts who would&#8230; Yes you would screw Aunt Tilly out of the utter speed but she wouldnt want it anyhow&#8230; I say take a chance and jump in faith on Jesus above&#8230; You wont be sorry&#8230; My two cents for what they are worth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Mortensen</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-124986</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Mortensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2421#comment-124986</guid>
		<description>one word: &quot;nanobuntu&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one word: &#8220;nanobuntu&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>