Comments on: Nanotechnology for health: 10-year EU-US perspective http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Technut News » Our Technological Future - Mixed Bag #18 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438#comment-466540 Technut News » Our Technological Future - Mixed Bag #18 Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:17:41 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438#comment-466540 [...] Nanotechnology for health: 10-year EU-US perspective [...] [...] Nanotechnology for health: 10-year EU-US perspective [...]

]]> By: ali http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438#comment-174334 ali Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:49:35 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438#comment-174334 These new products are the true new nanotechnology that the investment community is looking for These new products are the true new nanotechnology that the investment community is looking for

]]> By: Charles H. Tankersley http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438#comment-163203 Charles H. Tankersley Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:44:44 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438#comment-163203 "The paper version I have doesn’t appear to be copyrighted, so perhaps someone will put it up. —Christine" I am interested in publishing any worthwhile educational material for continued adult education via distance learning in this field. The website I have posted in this reply, http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~chtank/starships.html, is where I would publish it but within the format presented on thsi webpage. If you present me with an electonic copy wiht copyright release included, I will at least give a link (URL) to the article(s) selected. It may be e-mailed to me at chtank@tke-haaai.org, however, I must reserve my editorial right for myself and will have the final say as to what is publish on my website. In addtion, we must not only see that "nanomedical technologies delivered affordably to developing nations" but to all peoples, regardless of nations or wealth. Near 50% of the world is either diabled or partcially so, many due to aging. This, then, points to the need of providing the information and tools to the medical care givers at the earlist possible time as it is developed, tested, and approved. “The paper version I have doesn’t appear to be copyrighted, so perhaps someone will put it up. —Christine” I am interested in publishing any worthwhile educational material for continued adult education via distance learning in this field. The website I have posted in this reply, http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~chtank/starships.html, is where I would publish it but within the format presented on thsi webpage. If you present me with an electonic copy wiht copyright release included, I will at least give a link (URL) to the article(s) selected. It may be e-mailed to me at chtank@tke-haaai.org, however, I must reserve my editorial right for myself and will have the final say as to what is publish on my website.

In addtion, we must not only see that “nanomedical technologies delivered affordably to developing nations” but to all peoples, regardless of nations or wealth. Near 50% of the world is either diabled or partcially so, many due to aging. This, then, points to the need of providing the information and tools to the medical care givers at the earlist possible time as it is developed, tested, and approved.

]]> By: LARRY http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438#comment-162722 LARRY Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:05:46 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2438#comment-162722 Hi, as an outsider interested in learning about and eventually investing in Nanotechnology I have a real problem with the terminology being used by the manufacturers today. When I look at products and anticipated products all I see are existing materials blended, mixed, or pounded into smaller portions of that existing material. I don't see new chemical or mechanical products being produced. These new products are the true new nanotechnology that the investment community is looking for. Can't you compell those who are using the terms nano to find another term, or to use the term miniturized technology to describe their products which are not new materials. Thank you for giving me a forum. Hi, as an outsider interested in learning about and eventually investing in Nanotechnology I have a real problem with the terminology being used by the manufacturers today. When I look at products and anticipated products all I see are existing materials blended, mixed, or pounded into smaller portions of that existing material. I don’t see new chemical or mechanical products being produced. These new products are the true new nanotechnology that the investment community is looking for. Can’t you compell those who are using the terms nano to find another term, or to use the term miniturized technology to describe their products which are not new materials.
Thank you for giving me a forum.

]]>