<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looong and thin carbon tubes via nanotechnology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2493</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvaro Cabal</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2493#comment-253780</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvaro Cabal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2493#comment-253780</guid>
		<description>Transmits electricity as efficiently as copper?  I thought it was 1000 times better (faster), due to the spiraling movement of the electrons traveling through the CNT...or maybe this number is refering to a &quot;Perfect&quot; CNT, which do not exist yet...Am I right?

AL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transmits electricity as efficiently as copper?  I thought it was 1000 times better (faster), due to the spiraling movement of the electrons traveling through the CNT&#8230;or maybe this number is refering to a &#8220;Perfect&#8221; CNT, which do not exist yet&#8230;Am I right?</p>
<p>AL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2493#comment-253188</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 13:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2493#comment-253188</guid>
		<description>A shame there are no hard numbers. And they avoid the words &quot;space elevator&quot; like the plague ;-)

Is this regarded as a good study on Elevator construction?

http://www.isr.us/Downloads/niac_pdf/chapter2.html

Their nanoyarn looks very clean and regular compared to the micrograph figure 2.2 on that page. But of course, with no scale on the diagram we can&#039;t know that the structures are equivalent. If you look closely you can see helical surface detail - but without scale we don&#039;t know if these are individual nanotubes or just higher-order threads that compose the yarn.

I found an article on Textile World that implies that the tubes are exceeding 2 mm in length (uses the word &quot;millimetres&quot;).
http://www.textileworld.com/News.htm?CD=5&amp;ID=12965

This isn&#039;t the first article I&#039;ve seen recently claiming scaled-up production of long nanotubes though. All good news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shame there are no hard numbers. And they avoid the words &#8220;space elevator&#8221; like the plague <img src='http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Is this regarded as a good study on Elevator construction?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.isr.us/Downloads/niac_pdf/chapter2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.isr.us/Downloads/niac_pdf/chapter2.html</a></p>
<p>Their nanoyarn looks very clean and regular compared to the micrograph figure 2.2 on that page. But of course, with no scale on the diagram we can&#8217;t know that the structures are equivalent. If you look closely you can see helical surface detail &#8211; but without scale we don&#8217;t know if these are individual nanotubes or just higher-order threads that compose the yarn.</p>
<p>I found an article on Textile World that implies that the tubes are exceeding 2 mm in length (uses the word &#8220;millimetres&#8221;).<br />
<a href="http://www.textileworld.com/News.htm?CD=5&#038;ID=12965" rel="nofollow">http://www.textileworld.com/News.htm?CD=5&#038;ID=12965</a></p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first article I&#8217;ve seen recently claiming scaled-up production of long nanotubes though. All good news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>