<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK takes lead in the nanotechnology that matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2583</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanodot: Nanotechnology News and Discussion &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New strategic plan for US Nanotechnology Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2583#comment-453002</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanodot: Nanotechnology News and Discussion &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New strategic plan for US Nanotechnology Initiative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2583#comment-453002</guid>
		<description>[...] Maybe it&#8217;s a problem of time horizon. U.S. planners need to realize that some other countries look and plan farther ahead. The U.K., for instance. —Christine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Maybe it&#8217;s a problem of time horizon. U.S. planners need to realize that some other countries look and plan farther ahead. The U.K., for instance. —Christine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2583#comment-379977</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2583#comment-379977</guid>
		<description>Thank you for bringing this to the attention of your readers, Christine.  I know your headline is not entirely serious, but it is worth saying that there&#039;s lots of other nanotechnology that matters; the funding the UK announced over the summer for nanotechnology directed towards bringing ultra-cheap, large area solar cells closer to market, just to give one example, is very important too.  But it&#039;s important to balance the research portfolio to include both the closer to market areas and the more speculative, higher risk areas.  One thing sharp eyed readers might notice comparing this to your earlier coverage is that an extra million pounds has been found for the &quot;software control of matter&quot; projects.  Let me be the first to say, though, the UK will only take the lead in this, or any other area, when we get this stuff to work - funding projects is the easy bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for bringing this to the attention of your readers, Christine.  I know your headline is not entirely serious, but it is worth saying that there&#8217;s lots of other nanotechnology that matters; the funding the UK announced over the summer for nanotechnology directed towards bringing ultra-cheap, large area solar cells closer to market, just to give one example, is very important too.  But it&#8217;s important to balance the research portfolio to include both the closer to market areas and the more speculative, higher risk areas.  One thing sharp eyed readers might notice comparing this to your earlier coverage is that an extra million pounds has been found for the &#8220;software control of matter&#8221; projects.  Let me be the first to say, though, the UK will only take the lead in this, or any other area, when we get this stuff to work &#8211; funding projects is the easy bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>