<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanotechnology to reduce testing on animals&#063;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2596</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blahblah</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2596#comment-421188</link>
		<dc:creator>blahblah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2596#comment-421188</guid>
		<description>i think there might be some improvement needed to be done on the treatment of animals for animal testing, like  decreasing the number of uneccessary tests so we can decrease the number of animals becoming ill or dying.  But i dont think animal testing should be completely banned just because some people feel bad for the cute little monkies and critters.  Animal testing is too important to be banned, but it can be improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think there might be some improvement needed to be done on the treatment of animals for animal testing, like  decreasing the number of uneccessary tests so we can decrease the number of animals becoming ill or dying.  But i dont think animal testing should be completely banned just because some people feel bad for the cute little monkies and critters.  Animal testing is too important to be banned, but it can be improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>