<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top-down nanotechnology reaches downward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662#comment-501916</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662#comment-501916</guid>
		<description>Some people think that DNA nanotech is the best path for atomically-precise manufacturing; others prefer other pathways.  See the Technology Roadmap for Productive Nanosystems on our website for various pathways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people think that DNA nanotech is the best path for atomically-precise manufacturing; others prefer other pathways.  See the Technology Roadmap for Productive Nanosystems on our website for various pathways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanoman</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662#comment-501198</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662#comment-501198</guid>
		<description>Alright, thank you for the answer. As things are going, what area do you think appears to be the most promising for a true molecular assembler to come out of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, thank you for the answer. As things are going, what area do you think appears to be the most promising for a true molecular assembler to come out of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662#comment-500992</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662#comment-500992</guid>
		<description>Not as described, no.  It sounds like the molecular gate toolbit squirts out specific biomolecules in a pattern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not as described, no.  It sounds like the molecular gate toolbit squirts out specific biomolecules in a pattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanoman</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662#comment-500221</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2662#comment-500221</guid>
		<description>Is this a form of molecular assembler, from the way its described? Could it be used to make covalent carbon and other structures and build assemblers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a form of molecular assembler, from the way its described? Could it be used to make covalent carbon and other structures and build assemblers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>