Comments on: LA Times features nanotechnology debate http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2671 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: kurt9 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2671#comment-510588 kurt9 Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:30:09 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2671#comment-510588 I just looked at the website of the organization that George Kimbrell represents. I don't know where they are coming from on nanotech, but I do see that they want to stop people from getting genetic tests without having to pay an MD to serve as a gate-keeper. This makes me think that George Kimbrell's organization is in the pay of the AMA, FDA, or some other player in the medical industry. The corruption of people like George Kimbrell does not surprise me. I just looked at the website of the organization that George Kimbrell represents. I don’t know where they are coming from on nanotech, but I do see that they want to stop people from getting genetic tests without having to pay an MD to serve as a gate-keeper. This makes me think that George Kimbrell’s organization is in the pay of the AMA, FDA, or some other player in the medical industry.

The corruption of people like George Kimbrell does not surprise me.

]]> By: gelana chibsa http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2671#comment-508108 gelana chibsa Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:29:02 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=2671#comment-508108 I want to learn more about nanophysics,keepon doing well I want to learn more about nanophysics,keepon doing well

]]>