Comments on: “Cold fusion” redux?

By:

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:10:10 +0000

Cold Fusion has its GOOD and its DANGER as well as Opportunity.

Falling into the wrong hands it could turn into a nuclear bomb which is undetectable. You MUST READ here:

http://tinyurl.com/ddfdvy

or click here:
http://tinyurl.com/ddfdvy

Write to CONGRESS about it!

By:

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:16:42 +0000

Well Josh and all, I am convinced from much evidence that there is an interesting overlap and coorelation between nanoscale materials and structures and the Casimir Force, zero point field, and this may be the source of low energy input nuclear reactions, or at least part of it. I attended a conference on these matters and in the hallway I spoke with some scientists and engineers who were telling me about experiments along these lines, in which the best materials for “cold fusion” experiments are nano characterized materials. Something interesting happens at that level. Also look into the antenna structure arrays of certain insects and the UV wavelength.

By the way, I gave a copy of your book “Nano Future” to an aspiring young student who is getting involved in molecular technologies, Josh. Do you plan on any more nanotech books in the near future?

By: J. Storrs Hall

J. Storrs Hall — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:21:57 +0000

BTW, the paper Ultra Low Momentum Neutron Catalyzed Nuclear Reactions on Metallic Hydride Surfaces by Widom & Larsen can be read in its entirety at http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0505026

It’s way beyond my level of expertise, but a physicist friend says it’s at least plausible.

By:

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:38:57 +0000

Cold fusion has been replicated thousands of times, and several hundred peer-reviewed papers about these replications have been published in mainstream journals. You can read hundreds of cold fusion papers here:

http://lenr-canr.org/