Comments on: Nanotechnology without Engines http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3006 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3006#comment-834724 Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:03:35 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3006#comment-834724 It is just first step into Mechano-Chemistry but a very long way to go and literally Foresight is highly appreciated to bring this to people S Najmul Haq Teaching Faculty Nanotechnology It is just first step into Mechano-Chemistry but a very long way to go and literally Foresight is highly appreciated to bring this to people
S Najmul Haq
Teaching Faculty Nanotechnology

]]> By: http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3006#comment-831832 Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:21:35 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3006#comment-831832 What is with these people, Josh and Christine and everyone? I mean don't they see the solid evidence of the possibility of mechanochemistry and molecular precision assembly in nature and in chemistry itself? Is it fear or ignorance or what? I want to thank you for your efforts to bring foresight to people! I appreciate it and I intend to renew my membership. What is with these people, Josh and Christine and everyone? I mean don’t they see the solid evidence of the possibility of mechanochemistry and molecular precision assembly in nature and in chemistry itself? Is it fear or ignorance or what?

I want to thank you for your efforts to bring foresight to people! I appreciate it and I intend to renew my membership.

]]> By: Christine Peterson http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3006#comment-831705 Christine Peterson Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:40:39 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3006#comment-831705 I was disappointed to see M&M refer to longer-term nanotech possibilities as "fantasies" and "futuristic (and perhaps even outlandish) visions". One might have expected historians to be able to reserve judgment and take a longer view. So many ambitious technological projections have come to pass, given time—historians of all people ought to be more cautious. I was disappointed to see M&M refer to longer-term nanotech possibilities as “fantasies” and “futuristic (and perhaps even outlandish) visions”. One might have expected historians to be able to reserve judgment and take a longer view. So many ambitious technological projections have come to pass, given time—historians of all people ought to be more cautious.

]]>