<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mindsteading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3012</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Storrs Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3012#comment-834238</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Storrs Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3012#comment-834238</guid>
		<description>Good point about halfsigma. Consider that link deprecated!

However, for readers of this blog, please note that referencing one post on a blog does not in any way constitute an endorsement of other things found on such blog.

I should go a bit further here and make it clear that the point of this post is not to advance any political agenda -- I agree with the Thiel essay I&#039;m quoting that that wouldn&#039;t be likely to have any great effect. The bottom line is in fact almost the opposite: many of the good effects to be desired from libertarian reform can also be had, and are in fact more likely to occur, by the alternate route of introducing AIs to make us, on average, smarter and richer.  Another way would be biological ways to make people smarter.

None of these options is exclusive.  We should be trying all of them simultaneously. I happen to know the most about AI.

You can see a video of me making the points about AI making a better world &lt;a href=&quot;http://vimeo.com/4017569&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in a debate at AGI-09.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about halfsigma. Consider that link deprecated!</p>
<p>However, for readers of this blog, please note that referencing one post on a blog does not in any way constitute an endorsement of other things found on such blog.</p>
<p>I should go a bit further here and make it clear that the point of this post is not to advance any political agenda &#8212; I agree with the Thiel essay I&#8217;m quoting that that wouldn&#8217;t be likely to have any great effect. The bottom line is in fact almost the opposite: many of the good effects to be desired from libertarian reform can also be had, and are in fact more likely to occur, by the alternate route of introducing AIs to make us, on average, smarter and richer.  Another way would be biological ways to make people smarter.</p>
<p>None of these options is exclusive.  We should be trying all of them simultaneously. I happen to know the most about AI.</p>
<p>You can see a video of me making the points about AI making a better world <a href="http://vimeo.com/4017569" rel="nofollow">in a debate at AGI-09.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3012#comment-834218</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3012#comment-834218</guid>
		<description>I don’t think you should be referencing halfsigma on this blog (which I’ve always viewed as being reasonably academic) when HalfSigma sports paragraphs such as this one: 

But who fathered Bill Clinton? Probably not William Jefferson Blythe, Jr, the guy his mother was married to when he was born, because that guy was stationed in Italy nine months before the birth! (According to unsourced internet rumors.) Whoever really fathered Bill Clinton, he passed on superior upper-middle-class genes. Bill Clinton went to Ivy League schools, married another Ivy League graduate, and raised a respectable daughter (unlike Sarah Palin whose children are all losers and sluts).

Ah, yes. The good old unsourced internet rumor and calling someone’s children losers and sluts. Fine entertainment, but hardly a high standard of excellence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think you should be referencing halfsigma on this blog (which I’ve always viewed as being reasonably academic) when HalfSigma sports paragraphs such as this one: </p>
<p>But who fathered Bill Clinton? Probably not William Jefferson Blythe, Jr, the guy his mother was married to when he was born, because that guy was stationed in Italy nine months before the birth! (According to unsourced internet rumors.) Whoever really fathered Bill Clinton, he passed on superior upper-middle-class genes. Bill Clinton went to Ivy League schools, married another Ivy League graduate, and raised a respectable daughter (unlike Sarah Palin whose children are all losers and sluts).</p>
<p>Ah, yes. The good old unsourced internet rumor and calling someone’s children losers and sluts. Fine entertainment, but hardly a high standard of excellence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3012#comment-834215</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3012#comment-834215</guid>
		<description>There’s a strong correlation between the wealth of the parents and the intelligence of the offspring. There’s a strong correlation between the wealth of the individual and the confidence that the market doesn’t need any attention or oversight. This is unsurprising, but I’d be careful with pushing this line of reasoning too far. Being a straight, white, college educated male also correlates with being libertarian, but only one of those things correlates with being intelligent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s a strong correlation between the wealth of the parents and the intelligence of the offspring. There’s a strong correlation between the wealth of the individual and the confidence that the market doesn’t need any attention or oversight. This is unsurprising, but I’d be careful with pushing this line of reasoning too far. Being a straight, white, college educated male also correlates with being libertarian, but only one of those things correlates with being intelligent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>