Citation needed.

I don’t think full-tilt industrial consumption of plant and animal natural resources with the intent to bury the product in a landfill is an efficient way to sequester carbon.

Manufacturing “carbon-bearing materials such as paper” probably emits more carbon than the final product contains. And most carbon laden materials are organic thus biodegradable – certainly paper is.

So we’d emit CO2 and stuff making the products, then bury it where it will decay into methane, which is a worse greenhouse gas than CO2. Doesn’t really sound like much of a carbon-sequestration strategy to me.

But I do hope that new tech like nanotech will help us stabilize our life-support system.