<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Antimatter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3038</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesG</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3038#comment-845335</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3038#comment-845335</guid>
		<description>Yes, but more relevent to the topic of this site, antimatter could be the fuel of the future, as atomically precise particle colliders should be able to make larger amounts, and utilize it safely and efficiently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but more relevent to the topic of this site, antimatter could be the fuel of the future, as atomically precise particle colliders should be able to make larger amounts, and utilize it safely and efficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>