<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited, expensive nanofactories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3064</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accelerating Future &#187; Nanofactories and Microfactories</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3064#comment-854379</link>
		<dc:creator>Accelerating Future &#187; Nanofactories and Microfactories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3064#comment-854379</guid>
		<description>[...] Josh responded to me on the nanofactories thing again. Chris Phoenix has a few relevant things to say on a related item, the possibility of microfactories. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh responded to me on the nanofactories thing again. Chris Phoenix has a few relevant things to say on a related item, the possibility of microfactories. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesG</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3064#comment-854131</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3064#comment-854131</guid>
		<description>Very good and informative post.  It makes a lot of sense to say the world will be one big machine without discrete nanofabs eventually (and quite probably soon after the first atomically self-replicating machine is made.)  This is fantastic stuff, if only we could get a billionaire or large government to come around and see the logic, we could have this stuff in a couple/few years probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good and informative post.  It makes a lot of sense to say the world will be one big machine without discrete nanofabs eventually (and quite probably soon after the first atomically self-replicating machine is made.)  This is fantastic stuff, if only we could get a billionaire or large government to come around and see the logic, we could have this stuff in a couple/few years probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>