<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moore&#8217;s Law and Robotics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3127</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3127#comment-859467</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3127#comment-859467</guid>
		<description>Moore&#039;s Law is a key, I agree. But, as you wisely point out, processing power isn&#039;t everything. You still need human programmers and sophisticated algorithms to approximate intelligence. After all, my pocket calculator has the same raw processing power as the Apollo spacecraft and yet it doesn&#039;t routinely go to the moon and back. To say that everything will be solved with more and faster processors is a relatively naive view; there are many other factors. 

Also, just wanted to say thanks for directing people to my site. I know you&#039;ve had the link up for a while now but I haven&#039;t had a chance to come over and say thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore&#8217;s Law is a key, I agree. But, as you wisely point out, processing power isn&#8217;t everything. You still need human programmers and sophisticated algorithms to approximate intelligence. After all, my pocket calculator has the same raw processing power as the Apollo spacecraft and yet it doesn&#8217;t routinely go to the moon and back. To say that everything will be solved with more and faster processors is a relatively naive view; there are many other factors. </p>
<p>Also, just wanted to say thanks for directing people to my site. I know you&#8217;ve had the link up for a while now but I haven&#8217;t had a chance to come over and say thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesG</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3127#comment-859462</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3127#comment-859462</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Moore&#039;s law is the key, even if roboticists don&#039;t know or understand it, the massive increases in computation that will be available as time goes on will cure all problems with AI and robotics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Moore&#8217;s law is the key, even if roboticists don&#8217;t know or understand it, the massive increases in computation that will be available as time goes on will cure all problems with AI and robotics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>